Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Glyphosate with each diluent caused unacceptable cotton injury.

A claim from Purple Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) Control in Reduced-Tillage Cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.) with Low-Volume Technology · 1994

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate with each diluent caused unacceptable cotton injury.

Treatment
glyphosate with each diluente0
Outcome
cotton injurye0
Direction
causede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“glyphosate with each diluent caused unacceptable cotton injury and seed cotton yield reduction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–945
t0

“Cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–91

Title

Purple Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) Control in Reduced-Tillage Cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.) with Low-Volume Technology

Charles T. Bryson; James E. Hanks; Gene D. Wills Weed Technology 1994. doi:10.1017/s0890037x00039154

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-4e0f9914e3d110ef1a38e941b68d8197f4117771561359636713e0c0ca9ad213 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

glyphosate · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 4 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Glyphosate caused no visible cotton injury.

    Glyphosate/MSMA mixtures in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) · 2004

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Directed post-emergence glyphosate produced no significant injury symptoms.

    Tolerance of Cotton to the Herbicide Glyphosate1 · 1979

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    The listed single and two-herbicide applications caused the least necrosis and total injury at 7 DAA, below 13%.

    Injury Potential from Herbicide Combinations in Enlist® Cotton · 2021

    Opposite direction

  4. positive
    Glyphosate/glufosinate-resistant cotton showed no more than 2% visible injury under glyphosate, glufosinate, or both.

    WEED SCIENCE Evaluation of GlyTol ™ and GlyTol ™ + LibertyLink ® Cotton in the Mid-South · 2013

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Glyphosate mixed with glufosinate did not increase cotton injury relative to glufosinate alone.

    Weed Control and Crop Response to Glufosinate Applied to ‘PHY 485 WRF’ Cotton · 2009 · compared with glufosinate applied alone

    Same direction

  6. negative
    Glyphosate at 70 g/ha or more produced visible injury in cotton.

    Yield and Physiological Response of Nontransgenic Cotton to Simulated Glyphosate Drift1 · 2005

    Same direction

  7. negative
    Glyphosate alone caused 3 to 11% cotton injury at 7 DAT.

    Mixtures of Glyphosate with CGA 362622 for Weed Control in Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)1 · 2004

    Same direction

  8. negative
    Both glyphosate formulations caused at most 2% cotton injury.

    Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Response and Weed Management with Trifloxysulfuron, Glyphosate, Prometryn, and MSMA · 2006

    Same direction

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.