Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Glyphosate/glufosinate-resistant cotton showed no more than 2% visible injury under glyphosate, glufosinate, or both.

A claim from WEED SCIENCE Evaluation of GlyTol ™ and GlyTol ™ + LibertyLink ® Cotton in the Mid-South · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate/glufosinate-resistant cotton showed no more than 2% visible injury under glyphosate, glufosinate, or both.

Material
Glyphosate/glufosinate-resistant cottone0
Treatment
glyphosate, glufosinate, or glyphosate plus glufosinatee0
Outcome
visual injurye0
Value
2% or lesse0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glyphosate/glufosinate-resistant cotton visual injury was 2% or less when treated with glyphosate, glufosinate, or glyphosate plus glufosinate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1431

Title

WEED SCIENCE Evaluation of GlyTol ™ and GlyTol ™ + LibertyLink ® Cotton in the Mid-South

J. Trenton Irby; Darrin M. Dodds; Daniel B. Reynolds; et al. 2013

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-f4860508d8c46e7633ec219ca4104ca28f001937a821a8c798133ce082f564b8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

glufosinate · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

16 papers: 2 positive, 14 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Glyphosate mixed with glufosinate did not increase cotton injury relative to glufosinate alone.

    Weed Control and Crop Response to Glufosinate Applied to ‘PHY 485 WRF’ Cotton · 2009 · compared with glufosinate applied alone

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  2. negative
    Glufosinate caused minor transient cotton injury.

    Weed Management with Glyphosate- and Glufosinate-Based Systems in PHY 485 WRF Cotton · 2011

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Glufosinate caused no visible injury to tolerant cotton.

    Tolerance of transformed cotton to glufosinate · 2001

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Glufosinate applications caused 3 to 11% crop injury.

    Evaluation of WideStrike Cotton Response to Repeated Applications of Glufosinate at Various Application Timings · 2015

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Glufosinate application rate did not affect visual injury or growth parameters in LibertyLink cotton.

    Response of LibertyLink and WideStrike Cotton to Varying Rates of Glufosinate · 2015

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Glufosinate increased leaf injury in both cultivar groups.

    Glufosinate Tolerance of Multiple WideStrike and Liberty‐Link Cotton (Gosspyium hirsutum L.) Cultivars · 2014

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Early postemergence dimethenamid-P plus glufosinate caused 3% to 5% injury in 2019.

    HPPD-resistant cotton response to isoxaflutole applied preemergence and postemergence · 2022

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    Glufosinate plus S -metolachlor produced 36% to 41% cotton injury at three days.

    Injury potential of herbicide combinations on XtendFlex® cotton · 2021

    Opposite direction

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

glyphosate · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 4 positive, 14 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Glyphosate after the four-leaf stage caused no observed cotton injury or yield loss.

    WEED SCIENCE Weed Response and Tolerance of Enhanced Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton to Glyphosate · 2007

    Opposite directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Glyphosate mixed with glufosinate did not increase cotton injury relative to glufosinate alone.

    Weed Control and Crop Response to Glufosinate Applied to ‘PHY 485 WRF’ Cotton · 2009 · compared with glufosinate applied alone

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  3. negative
    Glyphosate at 70 g/ha or more produced visible injury in cotton.

    Yield and Physiological Response of Nontransgenic Cotton to Simulated Glyphosate Drift1 · 2005

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Glyphosate alone caused 3 to 11% cotton injury at 7 DAT.

    Mixtures of Glyphosate with CGA 362622 for Weed Control in Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)1 · 2004

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Both glyphosate formulations caused at most 2% cotton injury.

    Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Response and Weed Management with Trifloxysulfuron, Glyphosate, Prometryn, and MSMA · 2006

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Glyphosate with each diluent caused unacceptable cotton injury.

    Purple Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) Control in Reduced-Tillage Cotton (Gossypium hirsutumL.) with Low-Volume Technology · 1994

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Glyphosate salts showed no difference in cotton injury, cotton lint yield or micronaire.

    Responses of Selected Weeds and Glyphosate-Resistant Cotton and Soybean to Two Glyphosate Salts1 · 2003 · compared with diammonium (Dia)

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    At 10 and 15 m, glyphosate added to dicamba enhanced cotton injury.

    POTENTIAL DRIFT AND INJURY OF HERBICIDES SPRAYED IN A WIND TUNNEL · 2019 · compared with dicamba

    Opposite direction

9 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.