Paper · 2019 · Engenharia Agrícola

POTENTIAL DRIFT AND INJURY OF HERBICIDES SPRAYED IN A WIND TUNNEL

Guilherme M. P. de Oliveira; Marco A. Gandolfo; Rone B. de Oliveira; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The possibility of synthetic auxin applications in crops increases the risk of injury to sensitive plants. The aim of this study was to quantify the drift of herbicides sprayed in a wind tunnel and the injury in cotton plants. The experimental design was a completely randomized design with five treatments and four replications. The tested spray solutions were dicamba (0.250 L c.p. ha−1), glyphosate (0.625 L c.p. ha−1), 2,4-D (0.250 L c.p. ha−1), glyphosate + 2,4-D (0.625 L c.p. ha−1 + 0.250 L c.p. ha−1), and glyphosate + dicamba (0.625 L c.p. ha−1 + 0.250 L c.p. ha−1). Drift was quantified in a wind tunnel, collected at distances of 5, 10, and 15 m in relation to the spray tip. Cotton plants were placed in the same wind tunnel and the injury was visually evaluated for at 3, 7, and 15 days after application (DAA). The addition of glyphosate to dicamba and 2,4-D potentiated the drift from 5 m. At 10 and 15 m, dicamba and 2,4-D in isolation had the lowest drift potential. At 5 m, the injury is higher than at other distances regardless of the spray solution. At 10 m, 2,4-D in isolation presented the highest injury when compared to dicamba in isolation at 7 and 15 DAA. At 10 and 15 m, the addition of glyphosate to dicamba enhances the injury in cotton plants and herbicide mixtures do not differ from each other in relation to injury.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding glyphosate to dicamba increased drift from 5 m.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
drifte0
Direction
potentiatede0
Comparator
dicambae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of glyphosate to dicamba and 2,4-D potentiated the drift from 5 m.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–904 · show in text ↑
e1

“injury in cotton plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding glyphosate to 2,4-D increased drift from 5 m.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
glyphosatee0
Outcome
drifte0
Direction
potentiatede0
Comparator
2,4-De0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of glyphosate to dicamba and 2,4-D potentiated the drift from 5 m.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–904 · show in text ↑
e1

“injury in cotton plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–226 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicamba alone had among the lowest drift at 10 and 15 m.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
dicambae0
Outcome
drift potentiale0
Direction
loweste0
Setting
10 and 15 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 10 and 15 m, dicamba and 2,4-D in isolation had the lowest drift potential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–983 · show in text ↑
e1

“injury in cotton plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–226 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2,4-D alone had among the lowest drift at 10 and 15 m.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
2,4-De0
Outcome
drift potentiale0
Direction
loweste0
Setting
10 and 15 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 10 and 15 m, dicamba and 2,4-D in isolation had the lowest drift potential.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–983 · show in text ↑
e1

“injury in cotton plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–226 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton injury was higher at 5 m than at other distances.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other distancese0
Setting
5 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 5 m, the injury is higher than at other distances regardless of the spray solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1070 · show in text ↑
e1

“injury in cotton plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 m, 2,4-D alone caused more injury than dicamba alone at 7 and 15 DAA.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume1
Treatment
2,4-De0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
7 and 15 DAAe0
Comparator
dicambae0
Setting
10 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 10 m, 2,4-D in isolation presented the highest injury when compared to dicamba in isolation at 7 and 15 DAA.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1071–1182 · show in text ↑
e1

“injury in cotton plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 202–226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 10 and 15 m, glyphosate added to dicamba enhanced cotton injury.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
addition of glyphosate to dicambae0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
enhancese0
Comparator
dicambae0
Setting
10 and 15 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 10 and 15 m, the addition of glyphosate to dicamba enhances the injury in cotton plants and herbicide mixtures do not differ from each other in relation to injury.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide mixtures did not differ in cotton injury.

Taxon
cotton plantsGossypium hirsutume0
Treatment
herbicide mixturese0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
do not differe0
Comparator
each othere0
Setting
10 and 15 me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 10 and 15 m, the addition of glyphosate to dicamba enhances the injury in cotton plants and herbicide mixtures do not differ from each other in relation to injury.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1349 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 2 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

dicamba · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

glyphosate · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 4 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 7 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.