Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Glufosinate applications caused 3 to 11% crop injury.

A claim from Evaluation of WideStrike Cotton Response to Repeated Applications of Glufosinate at Various Application Timings · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glufosinate applications caused 3 to 11% crop injury.

Treatment
glufosinate applicatione0
Outcome
Crop injurye0
Direction
highere0
Value
3 to 11%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop injury after each glufosinate application typically ranged from 3 to 11%, with higher injury observed where multiple glufosinate applications were made.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–880
t0

“WideStrike Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–31

Title

Evaluation of WideStrike Cotton Response to Repeated Applications of Glufosinate at Various Application Timings

Kelly A. Barnett; A. Stanley Culpepper; Alan C. York; et al. Weed Technology 2015. doi:10.1614/wt-d-14-00021.1

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-efb338cc1592965893fe397def9cdd705ae1455b89b2b38e6ef24be81cf19069 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

glufosinate · crop injury · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

16 papers: 2 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.