Paper · 2004 · Horticultural Science & Technology

Effect of Cooling Method on Growth and Yield of Tomato and Pepper Grown in Summer Season Greenhouse Culture

Younghah Choi; Joon-Kook Kwon; Jae-Han Lee; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to investigate the efficiency of cooling according to the cooling methods and test the growth and yield of tomatoes and peppers grown in the greenhouses during summer. The cooling methods were composed of the non-cooling, daytime cooling, nighttime cooling and all-day cooling. The daytime cooling induced by evaporation system utilizing an air cooler, the nighttime cooling induced by air flow using a fan with radiator. The highest room temperature was 4C lower in cooling than non-cooling and was 2C higher in cooling than out door temperature. The relative humidity was 10 to 20% and 5% higher in daytime and nighttime cooling than non-cooling, respectively. The room temperature and the relative humidity of the daytime were affected greatly by outside environment. The growth and yield of tomatoes made little differences from the cooling methods because of the other factors such as flower organ demage by high temperature and fruiting chemicals. The growth of peppers were not significantly differences between cooling methods, while the yield was highest in all-day and nighttime cooling, followed by daytime cooling and non-cooling. Results showed that the cooling had a great effect on the fruiting and yield of peppers, because of complex factors such as nutrition accumulated by cooling and pollination accelerated by air flow.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest greenhouse room temperature was 4C lower with cooling than without cooling.

Treatment
coolinge0
Outcome
highest room temperaturee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
4Ce0
Comparator
non-coolinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest room temperature was 4C lower in cooling than non-cooling and was 2C higher in cooling than out door temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest greenhouse room temperature was 2C higher with cooling than the outdoor temperature.

Treatment
coolinge0
Outcome
highest room temperaturee0
Direction
highere0
Value
2Ce0
Comparator
out door temperaturee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The highest room temperature was 4C lower in cooling than non-cooling and was 2C higher in cooling than out door temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative humidity was 10 to 20% higher with daytime cooling than without cooling.

Treatment
daytime and nighttime coolinge0
Outcome
relative humiditye0
Direction
highere0
Value
10 to 20%e0
Qualifier
daytimee0
Comparator
non-coolinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The relative humidity was 10 to 20% and 5% higher in daytime and nighttime cooling than non-cooling, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative humidity was 5% higher with nighttime cooling than without cooling.

Treatment
daytime and nighttime coolinge0
Outcome
relative humiditye0
Direction
highere0
Value
5%e0
Qualifier
nighttimee0
Comparator
non-coolinge0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The relative humidity was 10 to 20% and 5% higher in daytime and nighttime cooling than non-cooling, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth and yield of tomatoes differed little among cooling methods.

Treatment
cooling methodse0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
little differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“The growth and yield of tomatoes made little differences from the cooling methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–882 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth of peppers did not differ significantly between cooling methods.

Taxon
Peppert0
Treatment
cooling methodse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“The growth of peppers were not significantly differences between cooling methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pepper yield was highest with all-day and nighttime cooling, followed by daytime cooling and non-cooling.

Taxon
Peppert0
Treatment
all-day and nighttime coolinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
daytime cooling and non-coolinge0

Verbatim

t0

“Pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–65 · show in text ↑
e0

“the yield was highest in all-day and nighttime cooling, followed by daytime cooling and non-cooling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1171 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cooling is attributed a great effect on fruiting and yield of peppers through nutrition accumulated by cooling and pollination accelerated by air flow.

Taxon
peppersCapsicume0
Treatment
coolinge0
Outcome
fruiting and yielde0
Qualifier
nutrition accumulated by cooling and pollination accelerated by air flowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum
Capsicum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cooling had a great effect on the fruiting and yield of peppers, because of complex factors such as nutrition accumulated by cooling and pollination accelerated by air flow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1369 · show in text ↑

processing · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 36 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.