Claim · model-written summary
Growth and yield of tomatoes differed little among cooling methods.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- cooling methodse0
- Outcome
- growth and yielde0
- Direction
- little differencese0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Tomato”
e0“The growth and yield of tomatoes made little differences from the cooling methods”
Title
Younghah Choi; Joon-Kook Kwon; Jae-Han Lee; et al. Horticultural Science & Technology 2004
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect The highest greenhouse room temperature was 4C lower with cooling than without cooling.
- Intervention effect The highest greenhouse room temperature was 2C higher with cooling than the outdoor temperature.
- Intervention effect Relative humidity was 10 to 20% higher with daytime cooling than without cooling.
- Intervention effect Relative humidity was 5% higher with nighttime cooling than without cooling.
- Intervention effect Growth of peppers did not differ significantly between cooling methods.
- Intervention effect Pepper yield was highest with all-day and nighttime cooling, followed by daytime cooling and non-cooling.
- Mechanism Cooling is attributed a great effect on fruiting and yield of peppers through nutrition accumulated by cooling and pollination accelerated by air flow.