Abstract
This research was designed to determine if sethoxydim-resistant corn hybrids exhibited levels of cross-resistance to other acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase)-inhibiting herbicides. Three sethoxydim-resistant hybrids were tested in 1995 and four in 1996. The hybrids were treated with the 1 × (labeled use rate for annual grass control) and 4 × rate of clethodim, fenoxaprop-P plus fluazifop-P, fluazifop-P, quizalofop-P, and sethoxydim. At the 1 × rate, similar levels of corn safety were observed in both years with sethoxydim, quizalofop-P (except Asgrow RX620SR in 1995), and in 1996, fenoxaprop-P plus fluazifop-P. Corn treated with the 4 × rate of sethoxydim did not exhibit injury, while all other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides cause > 50% corn injury. Sethoxydim-resistant com hybrids used in this study did not consistently exhibit acceptable levels of cross-resistance to other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides. The use of clethodim will control volunteer sethoxydim-resistant corn in rotational crops.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
At the labeled rate, sethoxydim gave similar corn safety in both years.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- sethoxydime0
- Outcome
- corn safetye0
- Direction
- similare0
Not reportedComparatorValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At the 1 × rate, similar levels of corn safety were observed in both years with sethoxydim, quizalofop-P (except Asgrow RX620SR in 1995), and in 1996, fenoxaprop-P plus fluazifop-P.”
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
Claim · model-written summary
At the labeled rate, quizalofop-P gave similar corn safety in both years except for Asgrow RX620SR in 1995.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- quizalofop-Pe0
- Outcome
- corn safetye0
- Direction
- similare0
- Qualifier
- except Asgrow RX620SR in 1995e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At the 1 × rate, similar levels of corn safety were observed in both years with sethoxydim, quizalofop-P (except Asgrow RX620SR in 1995), and in 1996, fenoxaprop-P plus fluazifop-P.”
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
Claim · model-written summary
At the labeled rate in 1996, fenoxaprop-P plus fluazifop-P gave similar corn safety.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Treatment
- fenoxaprop-P plus fluazifop-Pe0
- Outcome
- corn safetye0
- Direction
- similare0
- Qualifier
- in 1996e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At the 1 × rate, similar levels of corn safety were observed in both years with sethoxydim, quizalofop-P (except Asgrow RX620SR in 1995), and in 1996, fenoxaprop-P plus fluazifop-P.”
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
Claim · model-written summary
Fourfold-rate sethoxydim did not injure corn.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- 4 × rate of sethoxydime0
- Outcome
- corn injurye0
- Direction
- did not exhibite0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Corn treated with the 4 × rate of sethoxydim did not exhibit injury, while all other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides cause > 50% corn injury.”
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
Claim · model-written summary
Other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides at fourfold rate caused more than 50% corn injury.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- all other ACCase-inhibiting herbicidese0
- Outcome
- corn injurye0
- Direction
- causee0
- Value
- > 50%e0
- Comparator
- sethoxydime0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Corn treated with the 4 × rate of sethoxydim did not exhibit injury, while all other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides cause > 50% corn injury.”
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
Claim · model-written summary
Sethoxydim-resistant corn hybrids did not consistently show acceptable cross-resistance to other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides.
- Taxon
- Corn
Zea mays subsp. mayst0
- Material
- Sethoxydim-resistant com hybridse0
- Outcome
- cross-resistance to other ACCase-inhibiting herbicidese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sethoxydim-resistant com hybrids used in this study did not consistently exhibit acceptable levels of cross-resistance to other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides.”
t0“Corn (Zea mays)”
Claim · model-written summary
Clethodim is proposed to control volunteer sethoxydim-resistant corn in rotational crops.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse0
- Treatment
- clethodime0
- Outcome
- control volunteer sethoxydim-resistant corne0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The use of clethodim will control volunteer sethoxydim-resistant corn in rotational crops.”
The same questions in other papers
Sethoxydim · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
Sethoxydim · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →herbicide · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.