Paper · 1997 · Weed Technology

Response of Sethoxydim-Resistant Corn (Zea mays) Hybrids to Postemergence Graminicides

Mark J. Vangessel; Quintin Johnson; Mark Isaacs

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This research was designed to determine if sethoxydim-resistant corn hybrids exhibited levels of cross-resistance to other acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase)-inhibiting herbicides. Three sethoxydim-resistant hybrids were tested in 1995 and four in 1996. The hybrids were treated with the 1 × (labeled use rate for annual grass control) and 4 × rate of clethodim, fenoxaprop-P plus fluazifop-P, fluazifop-P, quizalofop-P, and sethoxydim. At the 1 × rate, similar levels of corn safety were observed in both years with sethoxydim, quizalofop-P (except Asgrow RX620SR in 1995), and in 1996, fenoxaprop-P plus fluazifop-P. Corn treated with the 4 × rate of sethoxydim did not exhibit injury, while all other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides cause > 50% corn injury. Sethoxydim-resistant com hybrids used in this study did not consistently exhibit acceptable levels of cross-resistance to other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides. The use of clethodim will control volunteer sethoxydim-resistant corn in rotational crops.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the labeled rate, sethoxydim gave similar corn safety in both years.

Treatment
sethoxydime0
Outcome
corn safetye0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the 1 × rate, similar levels of corn safety were observed in both years with sethoxydim, quizalofop-P (except Asgrow RX620SR in 1995), and in 1996, fenoxaprop-P plus fluazifop-P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the labeled rate, quizalofop-P gave similar corn safety in both years except for Asgrow RX620SR in 1995.

Treatment
quizalofop-Pe0
Outcome
corn safetye0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
except Asgrow RX620SR in 1995e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the 1 × rate, similar levels of corn safety were observed in both years with sethoxydim, quizalofop-P (except Asgrow RX620SR in 1995), and in 1996, fenoxaprop-P plus fluazifop-P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the labeled rate in 1996, fenoxaprop-P plus fluazifop-P gave similar corn safety.

Treatment
fenoxaprop-P plus fluazifop-Pe0
Outcome
corn safetye0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
in 1996e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the 1 × rate, similar levels of corn safety were observed in both years with sethoxydim, quizalofop-P (except Asgrow RX620SR in 1995), and in 1996, fenoxaprop-P plus fluazifop-P.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fourfold-rate sethoxydim did not injure corn.

Treatment
4 × rate of sethoxydime0
Outcome
corn injurye0
Direction
did not exhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn treated with the 4 × rate of sethoxydim did not exhibit injury, while all other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides cause > 50% corn injury.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–48 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides at fourfold rate caused more than 50% corn injury.

Treatment
all other ACCase-inhibiting herbicidese0
Outcome
corn injurye0
Direction
causee0
Value
> 50%e0
Comparator
sethoxydime0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Corn treated with the 4 × rate of sethoxydim did not exhibit injury, while all other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides cause > 50% corn injury.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–761 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–48 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sethoxydim-resistant corn hybrids did not consistently show acceptable cross-resistance to other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides.

Material
Sethoxydim-resistant com hybridse0
Outcome
cross-resistance to other ACCase-inhibiting herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sethoxydim-resistant com hybrids used in this study did not consistently exhibit acceptable levels of cross-resistance to other ACCase-inhibiting herbicides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–919 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn (Zea mays)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–48 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Clethodim is proposed to control volunteer sethoxydim-resistant corn in rotational crops.

Treatment
clethodime0
Outcome
control volunteer sethoxydim-resistant corne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The use of clethodim will control volunteer sethoxydim-resistant corn in rotational crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1010 · show in text ↑

Sethoxydim · organism · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Sethoxydim · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 26 positive, 35 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.