Paper · 1984 · Annals of Botany

Influence of Photoperiod on Culm Elongation and Apical Development in Semi-dwarf and Standard-height Wheats

A. HAMA RASHID; G. M. HALLORAN

11
claims
11
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Flower initiation (FI) coincided with the commencement of culm elongation under both long (18 h) and normal (10·4–14·4 h) photoperiod in eight spring wheats, including both gibberellic acid-sensitive and -insensitive types, which differed widely in photoperiod sensitivity At FI the apex was significantly (P = 0·05) higher (above ground) in three of the wheats under long, compared with normal photoperiod; with no difference between the remaining five. Differences in response were not related to photoperiod response or gibberellic acid-sensitivity/insensitivity differences between the wheats. Long photoperiod prolonged the phase from terminal spikelet initiation (TSI) to anthesis (A) in all the wheats, except Sunset (with the greatest photoperiod insensitivity), with no clear differences in response between semi-dwarf and standard-height wheats. Respective rates of culm elongation from FI to TSI were lower under normal, compared with long, photoperiod in all varieties. That from TSI to A was unaffected by photoperiod, except in Sunset when it was significantly (P = 0·01) slower under long, compared with normal photoperiod. Rate of culm elongation from FI to TSI across cultivars and photoperiods was inversely related to spikelet number per head (r = −0·53, P = 0·05) but not to rate of spikelet initiation (r = −0·14 n.s.).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower initiation coincided with the start of culm elongation under both long and normal photoperiod in eight spring wheats.

Taxon
spring wheatsTriticume0
Outcome
Flower initiation (FI) coincided with the commencement of culm elongatione0
Qualifier
under both long (18 h) and normal (10·4–14·4 h) photoperiode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower initiation (FI) coincided with the commencement of culm elongation under both long (18 h) and normal (10·4–14·4 h) photoperiod in eight spring wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At flower initiation, apices were higher under long than normal photoperiod in three wheats.

Taxon
wheatsTriticume0
Treatment
longe0
Outcome
the apexe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in three of the wheatse0
Comparator
normal photoperiode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At FI the apex was significantly (P = 0·05) higher (above ground) in three of the wheats under long, compared with normal photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–406 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At flower initiation, apex height did not differ by photoperiod in the other five wheats.

Taxon
wheatsTriticume0
Treatment
longe0
Outcome
the apexe0
Direction
no differencee0
Qualifier
the remaining fivee0
Comparator
normal photoperiode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At FI the apex was significantly (P = 0·05) higher (above ground) in three of the wheats under long, compared with normal photoperiod; with no difference between the remaining five.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 273–454 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in apex response were unrelated to photoperiod response or gibberellic acid sensitivity among wheats.

Taxon
wheatsTriticume0
Material
gibberellic acid-sensitivity/insensitivity differencese0
Outcome
Differences in responsee0
Direction
not relatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences in response were not related to photoperiod response or gibberellic acid-sensitivity/insensitivity differences between the wheats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long photoperiod prolonged the terminal spikelet initiation to anthesis phase in all wheats except Sunset.

Taxon
wheatsTriticume0
Treatment
Long photoperiode0
Outcome
the phase from terminal spikelet initiation (TSI) to anthesis (A)e0
Direction
prolongede0
Qualifier
except Sunsete0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Long photoperiod prolonged the phase from terminal spikelet initiation (TSI) to anthesis (A) in all the wheats, except Sunset (with the greatest photoperiod insensitivity)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–769 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The phase response to long photoperiod did not clearly differ between semi dwarf and standard height wheats.

Taxon
wheatsTriticume0
Material
semi-dwarf and standard-height wheatse0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
no clear differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum
Triticum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMottaW · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with no clear differences in response between semi-dwarf and standard-height wheats.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–855 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Culm elongation from flower initiation to terminal spikelet initiation was slower under normal than long photoperiod in all varieties.

Taxon
varietiese0
Treatment
normale0
Outcome
rates of culm elongation from FI to TSIe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
longe0

Verbatim

e0

“Respective rates of culm elongation from FI to TSI were lower under normal, compared with long, photoperiod in all varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Culm elongation from terminal spikelet initiation to anthesis was unaffected by photoperiod except in Sunset.

Taxon
Sunsete0
Treatment
photoperiode0
Outcome
That from TSI to Ae0
Direction
unaffectede0
Qualifier
except in Sunsete0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“That from TSI to A was unaffected by photoperiod, except in Sunset when it was significantly (P = 0·01) slower under long, compared with normal photoperiod.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1138 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In Sunset, culm elongation from terminal spikelet initiation to anthesis was slower under long than normal photoperiod.

Taxon
Sunsete0
Treatment
longe0
Outcome
That from TSI to Ae0
Direction
slowere0
Comparator
normal photoperiode0

Verbatim

e0

“That from TSI to A was unaffected by photoperiod, except in Sunset when it was significantly (P = 0·01) slower under long, compared with normal photoperiod.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1138 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Across cultivars and photoperiods, culm elongation rate from flower initiation to terminal spikelet initiation was inversely related to spikelet number per head.

Taxon
cultivarse0
Organ / stage
spikelet number per heade0
Outcome
Rate of culm elongation from FI to TSIe0
Direction
inversely relatede0
Value
r = −0·53e0

Verbatim

e0

“Rate of culm elongation from FI to TSI across cultivars and photoperiods was inversely related to spikelet number per head (r = −0·53, P = 0·05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1283 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Across cultivars and photoperiods, culm elongation rate from flower initiation to terminal spikelet initiation was not associated with spikelet initiation rate.

Taxon
cultivarse0
Organ / stage
spikelet initiatione0
Outcome
rate of spikelet initiatione0
Direction
note0
Value
r = −0·14e0

Verbatim

e0

“Rate of culm elongation from FI to TSI across cultivars and photoperiods was inversely related to spikelet number per head (r = −0·53, P = 0·05) but not to rate of spikelet initiation (r = −0·14 n.s.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1340 · show in text ↑