Paper · 2018 · Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports

Seeding Rate for Dryland Wheat

A. Schlegel; J. D. Holman; L. Haag

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Four winter wheat varieties (PlainsGold Byrd, Limagrain T158, Syngenta TAM 111, and WestBred Winterhawk) were planted at five seeding rates (30, 45, 60, 75, and 90 lb/a) in the fall of 2014, 2015, and 2016 at Colby, Garden City, and Tribune, KS. The objective of the study is to identify appropriate seeding rates for dryland winter wheat in western Kansas. Averaged across varieties, a seeding rate of 60 lb/a seemed to be adequate at all locations in 2015. However, with higher yields in 2016, a higher seed­ing rate (75 lb/a) was beneficial. Although yields were less in 2017 than 2016, a seeding rate of 75 lb/a generally produced the highest yields. The wheat variety T158 was the highest yielding (or in the highest group) at all locations in 2015. Other varieties may have been affected by differential response to stripe rust and winter injury resulting in lower yields. In 2016, the highest yielding variety varied by location. TAM 114 was in the highest yielding variety at each location in 2017. Variety selection and growing season appears to have more effect on wheat yields than seeding rate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Averaged across varieties, a seeding rate of 60 lb/a seemed adequate for dryland winter wheat at all locations in 2015.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
seeding rate of 60 lb/a seemed to be adequatee1
Setting
western Kansase0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dryland winter wheat in western Kansas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–356 · show in text ↑
e1

“a seeding rate of 60 lb/a seemed to be adequate at all locations in 2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 385–457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With higher yields in 2016, a higher seeding rate of 75 lb/a was beneficial for winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
75 lb/ae1
Outcome
beneficiale1
Direction
beneficiale1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four winter wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“(75 lb/a) was beneficial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A seeding rate of 75 lb/a generally produced the highest yields in 2017 winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
seeding rate of 75 lb/ae1
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
higheste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four winter wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“a seeding rate of 75 lb/a generally produced the highest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–653 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat variety T158 was the highest yielding (or in the highest group) at all locations in 2015.

Material
T158e0
Outcome
highest yieldinge0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat variety T158 was the highest yielding (or in the highest group) at all locations in 2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–753 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2016 the highest yielding winter wheat variety varied by location.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
highest yielding variety varied by locatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four winter wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 2016, the highest yielding variety varied by location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–935 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TAM 114 was the highest yielding winter wheat variety at each location in 2017.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Material
TAM 114e1
Outcome
highest yielding varietye1
Direction
higheste1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four winter wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“TAM 114 was in the highest yielding variety at each location in 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 937–1005 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other varieties may have been affected by differential response to stripe rust and winter injury, resulting in lower yields.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Interactor
stripe ruste1pathogen
Outcome
lower yieldse1
Qualifier
winter injurye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four winter wheat varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–27 · show in text ↑
e1

“Other varieties may have been affected by differential response to stripe rust and winter injury resulting in lower yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–877 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety selection and growing season appear to have more effect on wheat yields than seeding rate.

Treatment
Variety selection and growing seasone0
Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Direction
more effecte0
Comparator
seeding ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Variety selection and growing season appears to have more effect on wheat yields than seeding rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1105 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.