Paper · 1998 · HortScience

Evaluation of Tomato Transplant Production Methods for Improving Establishment Rates

Joseph A. Ciardi; Charles S. Vavrina; Michael D. Orzolek

10
claims
24
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Eight different tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) transplant production methods were tested during two growing seasons (1993-94) to determine their effectiveness in increasing both establishment rate and yield. Seven-week-old greenhouse grown transplants of `Hypeel 696' were shipped from Florida to Pennsylvania and planted at the Pennsylvania State Univ. Horticulture Research Farm. Transplants were also grown at the Pennsylvania State University to compare their growth with that of southern-grown plants. In 1993, increased nutrient levels during the last 10 days of transplant production significantly increased transplant size, establishment rate, and early yields, while the addition of Hydretain®, an aid to water retention and uptake, significantly increased total yield. In 1994, plants from Florida that were chilled for 7 days before transplanting and the Pennsylvania-grown plants had faster establishment rates than did nonchilled plants from Florida, but differences in yield were nonsignificant. Chilled and Pennsylvania-grown plants had significantly higher soluble carbohydrate levels in leaves, stems, and roots than did nonchilled and Florida-grown plants, while nutrient-conditioned plants had higher levels in leaves and stems. Establishment rate was not correlated with carbohydrate level. Chemical name used: (2-chloroethyl) phosphonic acid (ethephon).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1993, increased nutrient levels during the last 10 days of transplant production significantly increased transplant size, establishment rate and early yields of tomato.

Material
Hypeel 696e4
Organ / stage
Seven-week-old greenhouse grown transplantse4
Treatment
increased nutrient levels during the last 10 days of transplant productione2
Outcome
transplant size, establishment rate, and early yieldse2
Direction
increasede2
Setting
Pennsylvania State Univ. Horticulture Research Farme4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eight different tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) transplant production methods were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 1993, increased nutrient levels during the last 10 days of transplant production significantly increased transplant size, establishment rate, and early yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–677 · show in text ↑
e4

“Seven-week-old greenhouse grown transplants of `Hypeel 696' were shipped from Florida to Pennsylvania and planted at the Pennsylvania State Univ. Horticulture Research Farm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1993, the addition of Hydretain significantly increased total yield of tomato.

Treatment
the addition of Hydretain®e3
Outcome
total yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Setting
Pennsylvania State Univ. Horticulture Research Farme4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eight different tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) transplant production methods were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“the addition of Hydretain®, an aid to water retention and uptake, significantly increased total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–786 · show in text ↑
e4

“Seven-week-old greenhouse grown transplants of `Hypeel 696' were shipped from Florida to Pennsylvania and planted at the Pennsylvania State Univ. Horticulture Research Farm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–389 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilled Florida-grown tomato plants (7 days before transplanting) had faster establishment rates in 1994 than nonchilled plants from Florida.

Material
plants from Floridae5
Treatment
chilled for 7 days before transplantinge5
Outcome
establishment ratese5
Direction
fastere5
Comparator
nonchilled plants from Floridae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eight different tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) transplant production methods were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 1994, plants from Florida that were chilled for 7 days before transplanting and the Pennsylvania-grown plants had faster establishment rates than did nonchilled plants from Florida, but differences in yield were nonsignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1994, Pennsylvania-grown tomato plants had faster establishment rates than nonchilled plants from Florida.

Treatment
Pennsylvania-grown plantse5
Outcome
establishment ratese5
Direction
fastere5
Comparator
nonchilled plants from Floridae5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eight different tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) transplant production methods were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 1994, plants from Florida that were chilled for 7 days before transplanting and the Pennsylvania-grown plants had faster establishment rates than did nonchilled plants from Florida, but differences in yield were nonsignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1994, chilling for 7 days before transplanting did not significantly change tomato yield relative to nonchilled Florida plants.

Treatment
chilled for 7 days before transplantinge5
Outcome
yielde5
Comparator
nonchilled plants from Floridae5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eight different tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) transplant production methods were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 1994, plants from Florida that were chilled for 7 days before transplanting and the Pennsylvania-grown plants had faster establishment rates than did nonchilled plants from Florida, but differences in yield were nonsignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1994, Pennsylvania-grown tomato plants did not differ significantly in yield from nonchilled Florida plants.

Treatment
Pennsylvania-grown plantse5
Outcome
yielde5
Comparator
nonchilled plants from Floridae5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eight different tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) transplant production methods were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 1994, plants from Florida that were chilled for 7 days before transplanting and the Pennsylvania-grown plants had faster establishment rates than did nonchilled plants from Florida, but differences in yield were nonsignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilled plants had significantly higher soluble carbohydrate levels in leaves, stems and roots than nonchilled plants.

Organ / stage
leaves, stems, and rootse6
Treatment
chilled for 7 days before transplantinge5
Outcome
soluble carbohydrate levelse6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
nonchilled and Florida-grown plantse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eight different tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) transplant production methods were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 1994, plants from Florida that were chilled for 7 days before transplanting and the Pennsylvania-grown plants had faster establishment rates than did nonchilled plants from Florida, but differences in yield were nonsignificant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–1017 · show in text ↑
e6

“Chilled and Pennsylvania-grown plants had significantly higher soluble carbohydrate levels in leaves, stems, and roots than did nonchilled and Florida-grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pennsylvania-grown tomato plants had significantly higher soluble carbohydrate levels in leaves, stems and roots than nonchilled and Florida-grown plants.

Organ / stage
leaves, stems, and rootse6
Treatment
Pennsylvania-grown plantse6
Outcome
soluble carbohydrate levelse6
Direction
highere6
Comparator
nonchilled and Florida-grown plantse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eight different tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) transplant production methods were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e6

“Chilled and Pennsylvania-grown plants had significantly higher soluble carbohydrate levels in leaves, stems, and roots than did nonchilled and Florida-grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1182 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient-conditioned tomato plants had higher soluble carbohydrate levels in leaves and stems.

Organ / stage
leaves and stemse7
Treatment
nutrient-conditioned plantse7
Outcome
soluble carbohydrate levelse6
Direction
highere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eight different tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) transplant production methods were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e6

“Chilled and Pennsylvania-grown plants had significantly higher soluble carbohydrate levels in leaves, stems, and roots than did nonchilled and Florida-grown plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1182 · show in text ↑
e7

“while nutrient-conditioned plants had higher levels in leaves and stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1255 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Establishment rate of tomato transplants was not correlated with carbohydrate level.

Compound
carbohydrate levele7
Outcome
establishment ratee7
Direction
not correlatede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Eight different tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) transplant production methods were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e7

“Establishment rate was not correlated with carbohydrate level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1318 · show in text ↑

transplanting · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 23 positive, 9 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

transplanting · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 55 positive, 21 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.