Abstract
Recently, Tuta absoluta became one of the major pests that attack commercial tomato globally. Field test was done to evaluate the effect of different concentrations of nanosilica (NS) and jasmonic acid (JA), and compared them with indoxacrb (recommended insecticide) on reduction of damage rate caused by T. absoluta larvae under field conditions. Nanosilica (600 ppm) and indoxacrb (0.25 cm3/L) had the highest efficiency to reduce the rate of mines in the leaves. Jasmonic acid at rate 1.141 μM/plant showed a good reduction of number of fruits damaged. Nanosilica with 600 ppm concentration and Jasmonic acid at rate 1.141 μM/plant is used to control T. absoluta in the field.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Nanosilica at 600 ppm had the highest efficiency in reducing the rate of leaf mines caused by Tuta absoluta in field tomato, compared with indoxacrb.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Nanosilica (600 ppm)e1
- Interactor
- Tuta absoluta
.jpg?width=60)
Tuta absolutat0pest - Outcome
- rate of mines in the leavese1
- Direction
- highest efficiencye1
- Comparator
- indoxacrb (recommended insecticide)e2
- Setting
- field conditionst0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“control Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) in tomato crop under field conditions”
e1“Nanosilica (600 ppm) and indoxacrb (0.25 cm3/L) had the highest efficiency to reduce the rate of mines in the leaves”
e2“compared them with indoxacrb (recommended insecticide)”
Claim · model-written summary
Indoxacrb at 0.25 cm3/L had the highest efficiency in reducing the rate of leaf mines caused by Tuta absoluta in field tomato.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- indoxacrb (0.25 cm3/L)e1
- Interactor
- Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- rate of mines in the leavese1
- Direction
- highest efficiencye1
- Setting
- field conditionst0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“control Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) in tomato crop under field conditions”
e1“Nanosilica (600 ppm) and indoxacrb (0.25 cm3/L) had the highest efficiency to reduce the rate of mines in the leaves”
Claim · model-written summary
Jasmonic acid at 1.141 μM/plant gave a good reduction in the number of tomato fruits damaged by Tuta absoluta.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Jasmonic acid at rate 1.141 μM/plante3
- Interactor
- Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- number of fruits damagede3
- Direction
- good reductione3
- Setting
- field conditionst0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“control Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) in tomato crop under field conditions”
e3“Jasmonic acid at rate 1.141 μM/plant showed a good reduction of number of fruits damaged”
Claim · model-written summary
Nanosilica at 600 ppm combined with jasmonic acid at 1.141 μM/plant is recommended to control Tuta absoluta in the field.
- Taxon
- tomatoSolanum lycopersicumt0
- Treatment
- Nanosilica with 600 ppm concentration and Jasmonic acid at rate 1.141 μM/plante4
- Interactor
- Tuta absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
- Outcome
- control T. absolutae4
- Setting
- the fielde4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“control Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) in tomato crop under field conditions”
e4“Nanosilica with 600 ppm concentration and Jasmonic acid at rate 1.141 μM/plant is used to control T. absoluta in the field”
The same questions in other papers
nanoparticle · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.