Abstract
Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) is considered the major pest that attacks tomato in many countries. Some insecticides (indoxacarb, imidacloprid) and non-traditional methods (culture filtrate of Bacillus thuringiensis, Artemisia cina extract, clove oil and nanosilica) were evaluated against T. absoluta in tomato under greenhouse conditions. Furthermore, GC-MS analysis was carried out to identify the chemical components of B. thuringiensis culture filtrate as well as A. cina and clove oil extracts. Nanosilica was the most effective treatment against T. absoluta followed by A. cina, imidacloprid A. cina, indoxacarb, filtrate of B. thuringiensis, imidacloprid, indoxacarb A. cina and clove oil treatments, respectively. The mixing of the tested insecticides with A. cina improved the efficiency against the tested insect relative to using insecticides alone. The results suggest possible use of the tested natural products and nanosilica as alternatives for T. absoluta control. Also, this study suggests the possible mixing of the A. cina extract with the tested insecticides to minimize health risk and environmental pollution.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Nanosilica was the most effective treatment against T. absoluta.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Nanosilicae0
- Interactor
- T. absoluta
Tuta absolutae0pest - Outcome
- most effective treatment against T. absolutae0
- Direction
- most effectivee0
- Comparator
- A. cinae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Nanosilica was the most effective treatment against T. absoluta followed by A. cina, imidacloprid A. cina, indoxacarb, filtrate of B. thuringiensis, imidacloprid, indoxacarb A. cina and clove oil treatments, respectively”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
A. cina treatment ranked second against T. absoluta.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- A. cinae0
- Interactor
- T. absoluta
Tuta absolutae0pest - Outcome
- followed by A. cinae0
- Direction
- followed bye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Nanosilica was the most effective treatment against T. absoluta followed by A. cina”
t0“Tomato”
Claim · model-written summary
Mixing insecticides with A. cina improved efficiency against T. absoluta relative to insecticides alone.
- Taxon
- tomato
Solanum lycopersicume1 - Treatment
- mixing of the tested insecticides with A. cinae0
- Interactor
- Tuta absoluta
Tuta absolutae1pest - Outcome
- efficiency against the tested insecte0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- using insecticides alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The mixing of the tested insecticides with A. cina improved the efficiency against the tested insect relative to using insecticides alone”
e1“Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) is considered the major pest that attacks tomato”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →nanoparticle · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.