Paper · 2025 · Insects

Formulation of Entomopathogenic Nematodes for Above-Ground Use Against Tomato Leaf Miner, Phthorimaea absoluta

Bancy W. Waweru; Joelle N. Kajuga; Athanase Hategekimana; et al.

5
claims
15
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The tomato leaf miner Phthorimaea (syn. Tuta) absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) is invasive in many agricultural regions. Its larvae feed inside leaf mines or tomato fruits and are difficult to reach with plant protection products. In contrast, entomopathogenic nematodes (EPNs) are highly virulent and can search for larvae. The challenge is to formulate EPNs to remain protected on a sprayed leaf surface until they enter the mines. We tested 11 formulations, including 2 oils, 4 gels or thickeners, 2 surfactants, 2 UV protectants, water, and combinations with and without the EPN Steinernema carpocapsae (Weiser) RW14-G-R3a-2 (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae), under non-closed low-humidity conditions. Six tomato leaf experiments with 1000 EPNs sprayed per leaf showed that EPNs in 0.25 to 0.5% canola oil or in 5% alkyl polyglycoside surfactant were the most effective (26 to 37%). Other formulations and an insecticide had less or no effect. Seven other bioassays showed that most formulations did not adversely affect EPN survival or pathogenicity. We assume that formulations of EPNs can be further improved, such as with other flowable gels or combinations, and encourage investment in the development of practical and economic protective sprayable formulations of EPNs against leaf miners to reduce reliance on chemical insecticides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Steinernema carpocapsae in 0.25 to 0.5% canola oil was among the most effective formulations against tomato leaf miner, at 26 to 37%.

Treatment
0.25 to 0.5% canola oile0
Interactor
Phthorimaea absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Second interactor
Steinernema carpocapsaeSteinernema carpocapsaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Tomato Leaf Minert0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
26 to 37%e0
Comparator
Other formulationse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Steinernema carpocapsae
Steinernema carpocapsae · Second interactorMirayana M. Barros, Dennis Chang, Dihong Lu, and Adler R. Dillman · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EPNs in 0.25 to 0.5% canola oil or in 5% alkyl polyglycoside surfactant were the most effective (26 to 37%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–893 · show in text ↑
e1

“Steinernema carpocapsae (Weiser) RW14-G-R3a-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Leaf Miner, Phthorimaea absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“Other formulations and an insecticide had less or no effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Steinernema carpocapsae in 5% alkyl polyglycoside surfactant was among the most effective formulations against tomato leaf miner, at 26 to 37%.

Treatment
5% alkyl polyglycoside surfactante0
Interactor
Phthorimaea absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Second interactor
Steinernema carpocapsaeSteinernema carpocapsaee1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
Tomato Leaf Minert0
Direction
most effectivee0
Value
26 to 37%e0
Comparator
Other formulationse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Steinernema carpocapsae
Steinernema carpocapsae · Second interactorMirayana M. Barros, Dennis Chang, Dihong Lu, and Adler R. Dillman · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EPNs in 0.25 to 0.5% canola oil or in 5% alkyl polyglycoside surfactant were the most effective (26 to 37%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 786–893 · show in text ↑
e1

“Steinernema carpocapsae (Weiser) RW14-G-R3a-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–639 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Leaf Miner, Phthorimaea absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“Other formulations and an insecticide had less or no effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–954 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other formulations and an insecticide had less or no effect against the tomato leaf miner.

Treatment
Other formulations and an insecticidee0
Interactor
Phthorimaea absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
Tomato Leaf Minert0
Direction
less or no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Other formulations and an insecticide had less or no effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Leaf Miner, Phthorimaea absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
e2

“Other formulations and an insecticide had less or no effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–954 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most formulations did not adversely affect entomopathogenic nematode survival or pathogenicity.

Interactor
Phthorimaea absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
EPN survival or pathogenicitye0
Direction
did not adversely affecte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most formulations did not adversely affect EPN survival or pathogenicity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1062 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Leaf Miner, Phthorimaea absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors encourage development of practical protective sprayable nematode formulations against leaf miners to reduce chemical insecticide reliance.

Interactor
Phthorimaea absolutaTuta absolutat0pest
Outcome
development of practical and economic protective sprayable formulations of EPNs against leaf minerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“encourage investment in the development of practical and economic protective sprayable formulations of EPNs against leaf miners to reduce reliance on chemical insecticides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1350 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Leaf Miner, Phthorimaea absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–110 · show in text ↑

Brassica napus var. napus · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

surfactant · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

insecticide · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.