Paper · 2016 · SAARC Journal of Agriculture

Performance study of some T. aman varieties under normal transplanting and double transplanting system

R Yasmeen; S Akter; T Halder; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to study the performance of three T. Aman varieties (BR22, BRRI dhan46 and BRRI dhan49) under normal transplanting with 30, 45 and 60 days old seedlings and double transplanting ( 30 days + 30 days) system at Plant Physiology Division of Bangladesh Rice Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur during T. Aman season, 2013. Interaction effect was significant only for days to maximum flowering and sterility percentage. BR22 required longer duration to complete flowering when transplanted with 60 days old seedlings, while sterility percentage was higher in BRRIdhan 49 when transplanted with same aged seedlings. Photosynthetic rate, LAI, total dry matter production, yield contributing characters and harvest index of tested varieties were insignificant under different transplanting methods; these parameters contributed to produce similar grain yield. The results revealed that rice varieties BR22, BRRI dhan46 and BRRI dhan49 showed similar performance under normal transplanting with different aged seedlings and double transplanting in respect of photosynthetic rate, tillering pattern, LAI, total dry matter production and grain yield during T. Aman season.SAARC J. Agri., 14(1): 37-45 (2016)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of variety and transplanting system was significant only for days to maximum flowering and sterility percentage.

Outcome
days to maximum flowering and sterility percentagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction effect was significant only for days to maximum flowering and sterility percentage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–445 · show in text ↑
e7

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BR22 needed longer to complete flowering when transplanted with 60-day-old seedlings.

Material
BR22e0
Treatment
transplanted with 60 days old seedlingse0
Outcome
duration to complete floweringe0
Direction
longere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BR22 required longer duration to complete flowering when transplanted with 60 days old seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 447–543 · show in text ↑
e7

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sterility percentage was higher in BRRIdhan 49 when transplanted with same-aged (60-day-old) seedlings.

Material
BRRIdhan 49e0
Treatment
transplanted with same aged seedlingse0
Outcome
sterility percentagee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sterility percentage was higher in BRRIdhan 49 when transplanted with same aged seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–640 · show in text ↑
e7

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic rate, LAI and total dry matter production did not differ significantly among transplanting methods.

Treatment
different transplanting methodse0
Outcome
Photosynthetic rate, LAI, total dry matter productione0
Direction
insignificante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rate, LAI, total dry matter production, yield contributing characters and harvest index of tested varieties were insignificant under different transplanting methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–821 · show in text ↑
e7

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield contributing characters and harvest index did not differ significantly among transplanting methods.

Treatment
different transplanting methodse0
Outcome
yield contributing characters and harvest indexe0
Direction
insignificante0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Photosynthetic rate, LAI, total dry matter production, yield contributing characters and harvest index of tested varieties were insignificant under different transplanting methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 642–821 · show in text ↑
e7

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested parameters produced similar grain yield across transplanting methods.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
similare0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these parameters contributed to produce similar grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–882 · show in text ↑
e7

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillering pattern was similar under normal transplanting with different aged seedlings and double transplanting.

Treatment
double transplantinge0
Outcome
tillering patterne0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
normal transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“showed similar performance under normal transplanting with different aged seedlings and double transplanting in respect of photosynthetic rate, tillering pattern”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1120 · show in text ↑
e7

“rice varieties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 910–924 · show in text ↑

transplanting · physiology: photosynthesis · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

transplanting · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

227 papers: 190 positive, 37 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 190 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

223 papers more in this group

See all 227 papers →

transplanting · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,078 papers: 922 positive, 156 negative or no effect

155 papers in the same direction as this paper · 922 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,074 papers more in this group

See all 1,078 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.