Abstract
Abstract Oxyfluorfen exhibited intraspecific selectivity among cabbage ( Brassica oleracea L. var capitata) cultivars. The wettable powder (WP) and granular (G) formulations were less toxic to cabbage plants than the emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation when applied at 0.56 kg ai/ha. Susceptibility to oxyfluorfen injury decreased with plant age. Plants treated with 0.56 kg ai/ha of the WP formulation at the 2-leaf growth stage showed greater injury than plants treated at the 6–8 leaf stage. Oxyfluorfen injury symptoms from an application of 0.28 kg ai/ha EC formulation were increased when plants were treated previously with 1.12 kg ai/ha EPTC. Selectivity may be provided by cuticular wax on the cabbage leaves which prevents spray retention and penetration. Cultivars with increased cuticular wax showed reduced injury from oxyfluorfen application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Oxyfluorfen selectivity varied among cabbage cultivars.
- Taxon
- cabbage
Brassica oleracea var. capitatae0 - Treatment
- Oxyfluorfene0
- Outcome
- intraspecific selectivitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Oxyfluorfen exhibited intraspecific selectivity among cabbage ( Brassica oleracea L. var capitata) cultivars.”
Claim · model-written summary
WP formulation was less toxic than EC at 0.56 kg ai/ha.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Treatment
- wettable powder (WP)e0
- Outcome
- toxic to cabbage plantse0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Qualifier
- 0.56 kg ai/hae0
- Comparator
- emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The wettable powder (WP) and granular (G) formulations were less toxic to cabbage plants than the emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation when applied at 0.56 kg ai/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Granular formulation was less toxic than EC at 0.56 kg ai/ha.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Treatment
- granular (G) formulationse0
- Outcome
- toxic to cabbage plantse0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Qualifier
- 0.56 kg ai/hae0
- Comparator
- emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The wettable powder (WP) and granular (G) formulations were less toxic to cabbage plants than the emulsifiable concentrate (EC) formulation when applied at 0.56 kg ai/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Susceptibility to oxyfluorfen injury decreased as plants aged.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae1
- Organ / stage
- plant agee0
- Outcome
- Susceptibility to oxyfluorfen injurye0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Susceptibility to oxyfluorfen injury decreased with plant age.”
e1“among cabbage ( Brassica oleracea L. var capitata) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
WP at 2-leaf stage caused greater injury than at 6–8 leaf stage.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae1
- Treatment
- 0.56 kg ai/ha of the WP formulation at the 2-leaf growth stagee0
- Outcome
- injurye0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Comparator
- plants treated at the 6–8 leaf stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plants treated with 0.56 kg ai/ha of the WP formulation at the 2-leaf growth stage showed greater injury than plants treated at the 6–8 leaf stage.”
e1“among cabbage ( Brassica oleracea L. var capitata) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Prior EPTC increased oxyfluorfen injury.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae1
- Treatment
- 1.12 kg ai/ha EPTCe0
- Outcome
- Oxyfluorfen injury symptomse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- 0.28 kg ai/ha EC formulatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Oxyfluorfen injury symptoms from an application of 0.28 kg ai/ha EC formulation were increased when plants were treated previously with 1.12 kg ai/ha EPTC.”
e1“among cabbage ( Brassica oleracea L. var capitata) cultivars”
Claim · model-written summary
Cuticular wax may prevent retention and penetration of oxyfluorfen spray.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae0
- Outcome
- Selectivitye0
- Qualifier
- cuticular wax on the cabbage leaves which prevents spray retention and penetratione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Selectivity may be provided by cuticular wax on the cabbage leaves which prevents spray retention and penetration.”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivars with more cuticular wax had reduced oxyfluorfen injury.
- Taxon
- cabbageBrassica oleracea var. capitatae1
- Material
- Cultivarse0
- Outcome
- injury from oxyfluorfen applicatione0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- increased cuticular waxe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cultivars with increased cuticular wax showed reduced injury from oxyfluorfen application.”
e1“among cabbage ( Brassica oleracea L. var capitata) cultivars”
The same questions in other papers
botanical · crop injury · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →botanical · organism · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.