Intervention effectmodel-written summary

WP at 2-leaf stage caused greater injury than at 6–8 leaf stage.

A claim from Evaluation of Oxyfluorfen Formulations for Cabbage Weed Control · 1984

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WP at 2-leaf stage caused greater injury than at 6–8 leaf stage.

Treatment
0.56 kg ai/ha of the WP formulation at the 2-leaf growth stagee0
Outcome
injurye0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
plants treated at the 6–8 leaf stagee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants treated with 0.56 kg ai/ha of the WP formulation at the 2-leaf growth stage showed greater injury than plants treated at the 6–8 leaf stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–500
e1

“among cabbage ( Brassica oleracea L. var capitata) cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 57–117

Title

Evaluation of Oxyfluorfen Formulations for Cabbage Weed Control

J. M. Grabowski; H. J. Hopen Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1984. doi:10.21273/jashs.109.4.539

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-8142bc0f87f0326320f95e51efdcada780cb885b7fc7b49119e15a17f2c77abe · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

botanical · crop injury · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.