Paper · 2007 · JURNAL HAMA DAN PENYAKIT TUMBUHAN TROPIKA

KETAHANAN DAN PENGARUH FITOTOKSIK CAMPURAN EKSTRAK PIPER RETROFRACTUM DAN ANNONA SQUAMOSA PADA PENGUJIAN SEMI LAPANGAN

Dadang Dadang; Nur Isnaeni; Kanju Ohsawa

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Persistence and Phytotoxic Effect of Extract Mixtures of Piper retrofractum (Piperaceae) and Annona squamosa (Annonaceae) in Semi Field Test. Novel strategy in vegetable pest control program is necessary to be conducted to reduce high rate of synthetic insecticide use. Botanical insecticides offer one of alternatives. Prior to be applied in the field, it has to be evaluated the extract persistence and phytotoxic effect to crops. So, the objective of this research was to study the persistence and phytotoxic effect of extract mixtures of Piper retrofractum (Piperaceae) and Annona squamosa (Annonaceae) in semi field test. Extract mixtures were sprayed on broccoli plants, then at 0,1,2,3,5,7, and 10 days after exposure under sunlight, leaves of broccoli were served to Crocidolomia pavonana (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) to evaluate the insecticidal activity. The mortality activity of extract mixtures at 0.1% were still high until 10 days exposure. Moreover, no phytotoxic effect was occurred on broccoli plants treated with extract mixtures as high as at 0.1% of extract mixture concentration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mortality activity against Crocidolomia pavonana from the extract mixture at 0.1% remained high through 10 days of sunlight exposure.

Treatment
extract mixtures at 0.1%e0e1
Interactor
Crocidolomia pavonanaCrocidolomia pavonanae0e1pest
Outcome
mortality activitye0e1
Direction
highe0e1
Value
10 dayse0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Crocidolomia pavonana
Crocidolomia pavonana · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryKomal et al. (2021) · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mortality activity of extract mixtures at 0.1% were still high until 10 days exposure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–950 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaves of broccoli were served to Crocidolomia pavonana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–796 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli treated with 0.1% extract mixtures showed no phytotoxic effect.

Treatment
extract mixtures as high as at 0.1%e0e1
Outcome
phytotoxic effecte0e1
Direction
no phytotoxic effecte0e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no phytotoxic effect was occurred on broccoli plants treated with extract mixtures as high as at 0.1% of extract mixture concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1096 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaves of broccoli were served to Crocidolomia pavonana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–796 · show in text ↑

botanical · crop injury · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

botanical · Crocidolomia pavonana · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.