Paper · 2023 · Industrial Crops and Products

Glucosinolate-extracts from residues of conventional and organic cultivated broccoli leaves (Brassica oleracea var. italica) as potential industrially-scalable efficient biopesticides against fungi, oomycetes and plant parasitic nematodes

Daniel Eugui; Pablo Velasco; Patricia Abril-Urías; et al.

13
claims
19
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

This study aimed to standarize a protocol for obtaining a bioactive extract from broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) crop residues, that is suitable for application on an industrial scale and effective in reducing plant disease incidence. For this purpose, the influence of several extraction factors in the glucosinolate (GSL) content was studied with leaves collected from two conventional broccoli fields and two organic broccoli fields. The analysis showed that lyophilization had no influence on the GSL content. Storage of plant material under two different temperatures (− 20ºC and − 80ºC) had no influence on the GSLs content of the extracts. Phytotoxicity of the extracts was studied with six different plant seeds, and also cytotoxicity was determined with human liver cells in vitro. The extracts were phytotoxic at dilutions above 10%, while cell toxicity was low. Extracts concentrations of 0.1%, 1% and 2% were tested in vitro against eight plant pathogenic fungi and two oomycetes in solid and in liquid media. The extracts reduced the growth of several plant pathogenic fungi at 2% dilution by up to 38.37% against Alternaria alternata and up to 46.55% against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. When combined with myrosinase enzyme the effect of the extracts was enhanced, reaching inhibition values of 67.06% against A. alternata in solid medium and 68.52% against Rhizoctonia solani in liquid medium. In contrast, the same extracts increased the growth of the plant pathogenic oomycetes Pythium ultimum and Phytophthora cactorum. The effect of the same extracts in the free leaving larvae, J2s, of the plant-parasitic nematode (PPN) Meloidogyne javanica was not obvious. Minor significant differences were obtained but with no clear dose-response in nematode mortality, and no inhibition of eggs hatching was observed. These results show the industrial potential of using broccoli residues to obtain extracts with biopesticide activity against plant pathogenic fungi.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lyophilization did not influence broccoli extract glucosinolate content.

Treatment
lyophilizatione0
Outcome
GSL contente0
Direction
no influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lyophilization had no influence on the GSL content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–522 · show in text ↑
e1

“broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) crop residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Storage at −20ºC versus −80ºC did not influence extract glucosinolate content.

Treatment
− 20ºCe0
Outcome
GSLs contente0
Direction
no influencee0
Comparator
− 80ºCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Storage of plant material under two different temperatures (− 20ºC and − 80ºC) had no influence on the GSLs content of the extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–655 · show in text ↑
e1

“broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) crop residues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 81–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts were phytotoxic above 10% dilution in the tested plant seeds.

Taxon
plante0
Organ / stage
seedse0
Treatment
extractse1
Outcome
phytotoxice1
Value
above 10%e1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Phytotoxicity of the extracts was studied with six different plant seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–729 · show in text ↑
e1

“The extracts were phytotoxic at dilutions above 10%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–852 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extract cytotoxicity to human liver cells was low.

Taxon
humanHomo sapiense0
Organ / stage
liver cellse0
Outcome
cell toxicitye1
Direction
lowe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Homo sapiens
Homo sapiens · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryIanactually · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cytotoxicity was determined with human liver cells in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–799 · show in text ↑
e1

“while cell toxicity was low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 854–881 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 2% dilution extracts reduced Alternaria alternata growth by up to 38.37%.

Taxon
Alternaria alternataAlternaria alternatae0
Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
up to 38.37%e0
Qualifier
at 2% dilutione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extracts reduced the growth of several plant pathogenic fungi at 2% dilution by up to 38.37% against Alternaria alternata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 2% dilution extracts reduced Sclerotinia sclerotiorum growth by up to 46.55%.

Taxon
Sclerotinia sclerotiorumSclerotinia sclerotiorume0
Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
up to 46.55%e0
Qualifier
at 2% dilutione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum
Sclerotinia sclerotiorum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The extracts reduced the growth of several plant pathogenic fungi at 2% dilution by up to 38.37% against Alternaria alternata and up to 46.55% against Sclerotinia sclerotiorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding myrosinase enhanced extract inhibition of A. alternata to 67.06% in solid medium.

Taxon
A. alternataAlternaria alternatae0
Treatment
combined with myrosinase enzymee0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
67.06%e0
Comparator
extractse0
Setting
solid mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Alternaria alternata
Alternaria alternata · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMarta Hiromi Taniwaki, Secretaria de Agricultura e Abastecimento · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When combined with myrosinase enzyme the effect of the extracts was enhanced, reaching inhibition values of 67.06% against A. alternata in solid medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding myrosinase enhanced extract inhibition of Rhizoctonia solani to 68.52% in liquid medium.

Taxon
Rhizoctonia solaniRhizoctonia solanie0
Treatment
combined with myrosinase enzymee0
Outcome
inhibitione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
68.52%e0
Comparator
extractse0
Setting
liquid mediume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Taxonanonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When combined with myrosinase enzyme the effect of the extracts was enhanced, reaching inhibition values of 67.06% against A. alternata in solid medium and 68.52% against Rhizoctonia solani in liquid medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts increased Pythium ultimum growth.

Taxon
Pythium ultimumGlobisporangium ultimume0
Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the same extracts increased the growth of the plant pathogenic oomycetes Pythium ultimum and Phytophthora cactorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts increased Phytophthora cactorum growth.

Taxon
Phytophthora cactorumPhytophthora cactorume0
Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phytophthora cactorum
Phytophthora cactorum · TaxonMary Ann Hansen · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the same extracts increased the growth of the plant pathogenic oomycetes Pythium ultimum and Phytophthora cactorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1430–1544 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Meloidogyne javanica mortality showed minor significant differences with no clear dose response.

Taxon
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0
Organ / stage
larvae, J2se0
Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
nematode mortalitye1
Qualifier
no clear dose-responsee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of the same extracts in the free leaving larvae, J2s, of the plant-parasitic nematode (PPN) Meloidogyne javanica was not obvious.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1686 · show in text ↑
e1

“Minor significant differences were obtained but with no clear dose-response in nematode mortality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1687–1784 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Extracts did not inhibit Meloidogyne javanica egg hatching.

Taxon
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0
Treatment
extractse0
Outcome
eggs hatchinge1
Direction
no inhibitione1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of the same extracts in the free leaving larvae, J2s, of the plant-parasitic nematode (PPN) Meloidogyne javanica was not obvious.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1686 · show in text ↑
e1

“no inhibition of eggs hatching was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1790–1833 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli residues have industrial potential for producing antifungal biopesticide extracts.

Outcome
using broccoli residues to obtain extracts with biopesticide activity against plant pathogenic fungie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. italica
Brassica oleracea var. italica · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These results show the industrial potential of using broccoli residues to obtain extracts with biopesticide activity against plant pathogenic fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1835–1982 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Phytophthora cactorumPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · pest · Meloidogyne javanica (root-knot nematode)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

botanical · crop injury · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 6 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

processing · quality: phytochemicals · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 12 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

botanical · growth · Sclerotinia sclerotiorumResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

botanical · growth · Alternaria alternataResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.