Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Interactions

Antioxidant status and physiological responses of wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) to cycocel application and bio fertilizers under water limitation condition

Razieh Khalilzadeh; Raouf Seyed Sharifi; Jalal Jalilian

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
66
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In order to study antioxidant status and physiological responses of wheat to cycocel (CCC) and bio fertilizers application under water limitation condition, a factorial experiment was conducted based on randomized complete block design with three replications in 2015. Treatments included water limitation in three levels [normal irrigation (I1) as control; moderate water limitation (I2) or irrigation withholding at 50% of heading stage; severe water limitation (I3) or irrigation withholding at 50% of booting stage]; four bio fertilizer levels [(no bio fertilizer (F0), seed inoculation by Azotobacter chrocoocum strain 5 (F1), Pseudomonas putida strain 186 (F2), Azotobacter + Pseudomonas (F3))] and four CCC levels [(without CCC as control (C0), application of 400 (C1), 800 (C2) and 1200 (C3) mg/l)]. The results showed that water limitation decreased the chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, total chlorophyll, carotenoid, stomata conductance, leaf area index (LAI) and relative water content of wheat, but activity of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzymes and proline content were increased. Similar results were observed in CAT, POD and PPO activities due to bio fertilizers and CCC application. Besides the water limitation effects, CCC-treated plants displayed a significant decrease in stomata conductance and LAI. Generally, it was concluded that the application of bio fertilizers and CCC can be a proper tool for increasing wheat yield under water limitation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water limitation reduced wheat chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, total chlorophyll and carotenoid.

Treatment
water limitatione0
Outcome
chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, total chlorophyll, carotenoide0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water limitation decreased the chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, total chlorophyll, carotenoid, stomata conductance, leaf area index (LAI) and relative water content of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water limitation reduced wheat stomatal conductance, leaf area index and relative water content.

Treatment
water limitatione0
Outcome
stomata conductance, leaf area index (LAI) and relative water contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water limitation decreased the chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, total chlorophyll, carotenoid, stomata conductance, leaf area index (LAI) and relative water content of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–1002 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water limitation increased catalase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase activities in wheat.

Treatment
water limitatione1
Outcome
activity of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzymese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“activity of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzymes and proline content were increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1122 · show in text ↑
e1

“water limitation decreased the chlorophyll-a”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water limitation increased wheat proline content.

Treatment
water limitatione1
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“activity of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzymes and proline content were increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1122 · show in text ↑
e1

“water limitation decreased the chlorophyll-a”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–876 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer application increased CAT, POD and PPO activities similarly to water limitation.

Treatment
bio fertilizerse0
Outcome
CAT, POD and PPO activitiese0
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar results were observed in CAT, POD and PPO activities due to bio fertilizers and CCC application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“activity of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzymes and proline content were increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC application increased CAT, POD and PPO activities similarly to water limitation.

Treatment
CCC applicatione0
Outcome
CAT, POD and PPO activitiese0
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Similar results were observed in CAT, POD and PPO activities due to bio fertilizers and CCC application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1227 · show in text ↑
e1

“activity of catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), polyphenol oxidase (PPO) enzymes and proline content were increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC-treated wheat showed significantly lower stomatal conductance and leaf area index.

Treatment
CCC-treatede0
Outcome
stomata conductance and LAIe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CCC-treated plants displayed a significant decrease in stomata conductance and LAI.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1349 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend biofertilizer and CCC application for increasing wheat yield under water limitation.

Treatment
bio fertilizers and CCCe0
Outcome
increasing wheat yielde0
Qualifier
under water limitatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of bio fertilizers and CCC can be a proper tool for increasing wheat yield under water limitation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1497 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–55 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

131 papers: 16 positive, 115 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

127 papers more in this group

See all 131 papers →

drought · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

431 papers: 86 positive, 345 negative or no effect

344 papers in the same direction as this paper · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

427 papers more in this group

See all 431 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.