Paper · 2016 · Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research and Development

Production Potential and Economics of Fingermillet based Intercropping under Organic production System inAlfisolsof Karnataka

N. Jagadeesha; V.C. Reddy; M.R. Umesh; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiment was conducted at University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore with an objective to enhance productivity of fingermillet intercropping in organic systems of production during Kharif 2006 and 2007. Different organic manures at 50 kg N equivalent used in the experiment is farm yard manure (FYM), sewage sludge, poultry manure compost (PMC), urban garbage composts, enriched urban garbage compost and vermi compost (VC) compared to fertilizers alone. Irrigation water was provided during dry spells throughout the crop growth period. Application of sewage sludge (2498 kg/ha) or PMC (2475 kg/ha) produced significantly higher fingermillet grain yield and intercrop pigeonpea yield. Higher benefit cost ratio was recorded with the application of sewage sludge (2.27) and poultry manure compost (2.19) over the rest of the organic sources. The results inferred that application of a cheaper source organic manures like sewage sludge or poultry manure are substitutes for huge quantity of fertilizers applied with the fingermillet production system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge at 2498 kg/ha significantly increased fingermillet grain yield.

Taxon
fingermilletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
Application of sewage sludge (2498 kg/ha)e1
Outcome
fingermillet grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Setting
University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangaloree2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity of fingermillet intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–152 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of sewage sludge (2498 kg/ha) or PMC (2475 kg/ha) produced significantly higher fingermillet grain yield and intercrop pigeonpea yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–696 · show in text ↑
e2

“Field experiment was conducted at University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure compost at 2475 kg/ha significantly increased fingermillet grain yield.

Taxon
fingermilletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
PMC (2475 kg/ha)e1
Outcome
fingermillet grain yielde1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity of fingermillet intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–152 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of sewage sludge (2498 kg/ha) or PMC (2475 kg/ha) produced significantly higher fingermillet grain yield and intercrop pigeonpea yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge at 2498 kg/ha significantly increased intercrop pigeonpea yield.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
Application of sewage sludge (2498 kg/ha)e1
Outcome
intercrop pigeonpea yielde1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of sewage sludge (2498 kg/ha) or PMC (2475 kg/ha) produced significantly higher fingermillet grain yield and intercrop pigeonpea yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure compost at 2475 kg/ha significantly increased intercrop pigeonpea yield.

Taxon
pigeonpeaCajanus cajane1
Treatment
PMC (2475 kg/ha)e1
Outcome
intercrop pigeonpea yielde1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Application of sewage sludge (2498 kg/ha) or PMC (2475 kg/ha) produced significantly higher fingermillet grain yield and intercrop pigeonpea yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–696 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge gave a higher benefit cost ratio (2.27) than the other organic sources in fingermillet intercropping.

Taxon
fingermilletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
application of sewage sludgee2
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe2
Direction
Highere2
Value
2.27e2
Comparator
the rest of the organic sourcese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity of fingermillet intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–152 · show in text ↑
e2

“Higher benefit cost ratio was recorded with the application of sewage sludge (2.27) and poultry manure compost (2.19) over the rest of the organic sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure compost gave a higher benefit cost ratio (2.19) than the other organic sources in fingermillet intercropping.

Taxon
fingermilletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
poultry manure composte2
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe2
Direction
Highere2
Value
2.19e2
Comparator
the rest of the organic sourcese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity of fingermillet intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–152 · show in text ↑
e2

“Higher benefit cost ratio was recorded with the application of sewage sludge (2.27) and poultry manure compost (2.19) over the rest of the organic sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 698–852 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge or poultry manure can substitute for large quantities of fertilizers in fingermillet production.

Taxon
fingermilletEleusine coracanae3
Treatment
application of a cheaper source organic manures like sewage sludge or poultry manuree3
Outcome
substitutes for huge quantity of fertilizerse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“productivity of fingermillet intercropping”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–152 · show in text ↑
e3

“application of a cheaper source organic manures like sewage sludge or poultry manure are substitutes for huge quantity of fertilizers applied with the fingermillet production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–1061 · show in text ↑

organic · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results

166 papers: 159 positive, 7 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

fertilization · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

174 papers: 171 positive, 3 negative or no effect

170 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

170 papers more in this group

See all 174 papers →

organic · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.