Paper · 2016 · Plant Soil and Environment

Possibility of selenium biofortification of winter wheat grain

L. Ducsay; O. Ložek; M. Marček; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
75
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The effect of foliar application of selenium (Se) fertilizers (sodium selenite and selenate) in two different Se doses (10 and 20 g/ha) on grain yield, Se content and mechanical and technological parameters of winter wheat grain was investigated in the field fertilization experiment. Foliar spray application of Se was applied at the growth stage of the 2nd node on the main stem (32 BBCH). Selenate foliar applications in dose 10 g Se per ha showed a significant increase of grain yield in comparison to control treatment without Se application. The mechanical and technological parameters of wheat grain were not significantly affected by both selenite and selenate foliar application. The average Se concentration was significantly lower in 2007/2008 (grain yield 8.72 t/ha) than 2006/2007 (yield 6.35 t/ha) growing season (0.133 versus 0.189 mg Se/kg dry matter). The grain Se absorption efficiency at foliar application of 10 and 20 g Se/ha of selenite and selenate were 1.35-1.45% and 13.24-15.14%, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenate at 10 g Se per ha significantly increased grain yield relative to the untreated control.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Selenate foliar applications in dose 10 g Se per hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
control treatment without Se applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Selenate foliar applications in dose 10 g Se per ha showed a significant increase of grain yield in comparison to control treatment without Se application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 392–547 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Selenite and selenate foliar applications did not significantly affect mechanical and technological parameters of wheat grain.

Treatment
selenite and selenate foliar applicatione0
Outcome
mechanical and technological parameters of wheat graine0
Direction
not significantly affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mechanical and technological parameters of wheat grain were not significantly affected by both selenite and selenate foliar application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–688 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Average grain selenium concentration was significantly lower in 2007/2008 than in 2006/2007.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
average Se concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Value
0.133 versus 0.189 mg Se/kg dry mattere0
Comparator
2006/2007e0
Setting
2007/2008e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average Se concentration was significantly lower in 2007/2008 (grain yield 8.72 t/ha) than 2006/2007 (yield 6.35 t/ha) growing season (0.133 versus 0.189 mg Se/kg dry matter).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain selenium absorption efficiency for selenite foliar application was 1.35-1.45%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
selenitee0
Outcome
grain Se absorption efficiencye0
Value
1.35-1.45%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain Se absorption efficiency at foliar application of 10 and 20 g Se/ha of selenite and selenate were 1.35-1.45% and 13.24-15.14%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain selenium absorption efficiency for selenate foliar application was 13.24-15.14%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
selenatee0
Outcome
grain Se absorption efficiencye0
Value
13.24-15.14%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain Se absorption efficiency at foliar application of 10 and 20 g Se/ha of selenite and selenate were 1.35-1.45% and 13.24-15.14%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1019 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–62 · show in text ↑

selenium atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

37 papers: 25 positive, 12 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

application · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 24 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.