Claim · model-written summary
Selenium treatment did not significantly affect grain yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- See0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- not significantly affectede0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield was not significantly affected by either Se or S treatments”
t0“common wheat”
Title
Yidenekachew Berhanu Beshah; Antonio Pescatore; Lorenzo Guerrini; et al. Field Crops Research 2025. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110229
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Sulphur treatment did not significantly affect grain yield.
- Association Variety explained 86.05% of total protein concentration variation.
- Association Selenium rate moderately influenced protein concentration.
- Intervention effect Sulphur had no significant effect on total protein.
- Intervention effect Sulphur decreased gliadin content.
- Intervention effect Sulphur increased glutenin content.
- Intervention effect Sulphur shifted the gliadin-to-glutenin ratio.
- Association Dough strength and tenacity to extensibility ratio depended primarily on genotype.
- Intervention effect Sulphur caused variety-specific responses in dough properties.
- Intervention effect Increasing selenium significantly reduced phytic acid.
- Intervention effect Selenium reduced Phy:Se, Phy:Fe and Phy:Zn molar ratios.
- Association Sulphur treatment explained 82.5% of free asparagine variation.
- Intervention effect Sulphur fertilization reduced free asparagine in wheat grain.
- Intervention effect Selenium further reduced free asparagine, especially with adequate sulphur.
- Recommendation The authors recommend combined targeted selenium and sulphur foliar fertilization to improve wheat quality.