Paper · 2016 · Pure and Applied Biology

Effect of irrigation levels and seed rates on wheat production

Wajid Ali Shah

16
claims
33
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was carried out at Agricultural Research Station, Serai Nourang (District Bannu), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa-Pakistan to study the effect of irrigation levels and seed rates on wheat production. Experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with split plot arrangement having four replications. Five irrigation levels (IL1 = 120, IL2 = 230, IL3 = 360, IL4 = 470 and IL5 = 600 mm) were allotted to main plots. While seed rates (SR1 = 60, SR2 = 80, SR3 = 100, SR4 = 120 and SR5 = 140 kg ha -1 ) were allocated to sub plots. The sub plot size was 4 x 1.8 m 2 consisted six rows 30 cm apart. The fertilizer dose of 120 kg N ha -1 and 90 kg N ha -1 was applied in the form of Urea and DAP. Data recorded from the irrigation treatments revealed that maximum tillers m -2 (362), grains spike -1 (64), leaf area index (4.24), 1000-grains weight (43.19 g), grain yield (3130 kg ha -1 ), biological yield (13167 kg ha -1 ), net income (Rs. 44283), BCR (3.71%) and MRR (370.82%) was noted in plots irrigated with 470 mm water. Regarding seed rates, maximum tillers m -2 (346), grains spike -1 (62), leaf area index (4.08), 1000-grains weight (43.15 g), grain yield (3160 kg ha -1 ), biological yield (10403 kg ha -1 ), net income (Rs. 39967), BCR (3.46 %) and MRR (345.95%) was recorded in plots seeded with 120 kg ha -1 . In case of interaction between irrigation and seed rates, an increase was observed in tillers m -2 , grains spike - 1 , leaf area index, 1000-grains weight, grain yield, biological yield, net income, BCR and MRR up to 120 kg ha -1 as seed rate and 470 mm water as irrigation. It was concluded that irrigation up to 470 mm and 120 kg ha -1 seed rate gave better results and therefore recommended for better production of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 470 mm irrigation, wheat plots had maximum tillers, grains per spike, and leaf area index.

Treatment
470 mm watere0
Outcome
tillers m -2 , grains spike - 1 , leaf area indexe1
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum tillers m -2 (362), grains spike -1 (64), leaf area index (4.24), 1000-grains weight (43.19 g), grain yield (3130 kg ha -1 ), biological yield (13167 kg ha -1 ), net income (Rs. 44283), BCR (3.71%) and MRR (370.82%) was noted in plots irrigated with 470 mm water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–1036 · show in text ↑
e1

“tillers m -2 , grains spike - 1 , leaf area index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 470 mm irrigation, wheat plots had maximum 1000 grain weight of 43.19 g.

Treatment
470 mm watere0
Outcome
1000-grains weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
43.19 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum tillers m -2 (362), grains spike -1 (64), leaf area index (4.24), 1000-grains weight (43.19 g), grain yield (3130 kg ha -1 ), biological yield (13167 kg ha -1 ), net income (Rs. 44283), BCR (3.71%) and MRR (370.82%) was noted in plots irrigated with 470 mm water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 470 mm irrigation, grain yield reached a maximum of 3130 kg ha -1.

Treatment
470 mm watere0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3130 kg ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum tillers m -2 (362), grains spike -1 (64), leaf area index (4.24), 1000-grains weight (43.19 g), grain yield (3130 kg ha -1 ), biological yield (13167 kg ha -1 ), net income (Rs. 44283), BCR (3.71%) and MRR (370.82%) was noted in plots irrigated with 470 mm water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 470 mm irrigation, biological yield reached a maximum of 13167 kg ha -1.

Treatment
470 mm watere0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
13167 kg ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum tillers m -2 (362), grains spike -1 (64), leaf area index (4.24), 1000-grains weight (43.19 g), grain yield (3130 kg ha -1 ), biological yield (13167 kg ha -1 ), net income (Rs. 44283), BCR (3.71%) and MRR (370.82%) was noted in plots irrigated with 470 mm water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–1036 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 470 mm irrigation, net income reached a maximum of Rs. 44283.

Treatment
470 mm watere0
Outcome
net incomee0
Value
Rs. 44283e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“net income (Rs. 44283), BCR (3.71%) and MRR (370.82%) was noted in plots irrigated with 470 mm water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1036 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 470 mm irrigation, BCR was 3.71%.

Treatment
470 mm watere0
Outcome
BCRe0
Value
3.71%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“BCR (3.71%) and MRR (370.82%) was noted in plots irrigated with 470 mm water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1036 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 470 mm irrigation, MRR was 370.82%.

Treatment
470 mm watere0
Outcome
MRRe0
Value
370.82%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“MRR (370.82%) was noted in plots irrigated with 470 mm water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 kg ha -1 seed rate, wheat plots had maximum tillers, grains per spike, and leaf area index.

Treatment
120 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
tillers m -2 , grains spike - 1 , leaf area indexe1
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum tillers m -2 (346), grains spike -1 (62), leaf area index (4.08), 1000-grains weight (43.15 g), grain yield (3160 kg ha -1 ), biological yield (10403 kg ha -1 ), net income (Rs. 39967), BCR (3.46 %) and MRR (345.95%) was recorded in plots seeded with 120 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1331 · show in text ↑
e1

“tillers m -2 , grains spike - 1 , leaf area index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1420–1469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 kg ha -1 seed rate, 1000 grain weight reached a maximum of 43.15 g.

Treatment
120 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
1000-grains weighte0
Direction
maximume0
Value
43.15 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum tillers m -2 (346), grains spike -1 (62), leaf area index (4.08), 1000-grains weight (43.15 g), grain yield (3160 kg ha -1 ), biological yield (10403 kg ha -1 ), net income (Rs. 39967), BCR (3.46 %) and MRR (345.95%) was recorded in plots seeded with 120 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 kg ha -1 seed rate, grain yield reached a maximum of 3160 kg ha -1.

Treatment
120 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
3160 kg ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum tillers m -2 (346), grains spike -1 (62), leaf area index (4.08), 1000-grains weight (43.15 g), grain yield (3160 kg ha -1 ), biological yield (10403 kg ha -1 ), net income (Rs. 39967), BCR (3.46 %) and MRR (345.95%) was recorded in plots seeded with 120 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 kg ha -1 seed rate, biological yield reached a maximum of 10403 kg ha -1.

Treatment
120 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
10403 kg ha -1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“maximum tillers m -2 (346), grains spike -1 (62), leaf area index (4.08), 1000-grains weight (43.15 g), grain yield (3160 kg ha -1 ), biological yield (10403 kg ha -1 ), net income (Rs. 39967), BCR (3.46 %) and MRR (345.95%) was recorded in plots seeded with 120 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1331 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 kg ha -1 seed rate, net income was Rs. 39967.

Treatment
120 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
net incomee0
Value
Rs. 39967e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“net income (Rs. 39967), BCR (3.46 %) and MRR (345.95%) was recorded in plots seeded with 120 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1230–1331 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 kg ha -1 seed rate, BCR was 3.46 %.

Treatment
120 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
BCRe0
Value
3.46 %e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“BCR (3.46 %) and MRR (345.95%) was recorded in plots seeded with 120 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1254–1331 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 120 kg ha -1 seed rate, MRR was 345.95%.

Treatment
120 kg ha -1e0
Outcome
MRRe0
Value
345.95%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“MRR (345.95%) was recorded in plots seeded with 120 kg ha -1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of irrigation and seed rates increased the listed wheat production and economic variables up to 120 kg ha -1 and 470 mm.

Treatment
120 kg ha -1 as seed rate and 470 mm water as irrigatione0
Outcome
tillers m -2 , grains spike - 1 , leaf area indexe0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 46–51 · show in text ↑
e0

“an increase was observed in tillers m -2 , grains spike - 1 , leaf area index, 1000-grains weight, grain yield, biological yield, net income, BCR and MRR up to 120 kg ha -1 as seed rate and 470 mm water as irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1608 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend irrigation to 470 mm and a 120 kg ha -1 seed rate for wheat production.

Outcome
irrigation up to 470 mm and 120 kg ha -1 seed ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation up to 470 mm and 120 kg ha -1 seed rate gave better results and therefore recommended for better production of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1632–1759 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.