Abstract
Field studies were conducted at Tifton, GA to quantify phytotoxicity of flumetsulam on peanut as influenced by application rate and timing in a weed free experiment. Flumetsulam PPI at rates up to 0.14 kg ai/ha visibly injured peanut and reduced canopy width, but injury from PPI flumetsulam at 0.07 kg/ha or less was no worse than a standard early postemergence (EPOST) treatment of bentazon (0.6 kg ai/ha) plus paraquat (0.14 kg ai/ha). Flumetsulam EPOST at rates up to 0.07 kg/ha visibly injured peanut and reduced peanut canopy width. Flumetsulam injury at rates of 0.035 kg/ha EPOST was similar to that caused by bentazon plus paraquat. Interactive effects of PPI and EPOST flumetsulam reduced early and mid-season pod and foliage biomass more than either application alone. However, peanut recovered with final yields not affected by flumetsulam, regardless of rate or time of application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
PPI flumetsulam up to 0.14 kg ai/ha reduced peanut canopy width.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- Flumetsulam PPI at rates up to 0.14 kg ai/hae1
- Outcome
- canopy widthe1
- Direction
- reducede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field studies were conducted at Tifton, GA to quantify phytotoxicity of flumetsulam on peanut as influenced by application rate and timing in a weed free experiment”
e1“Flumetsulam PPI at rates up to 0.14 kg ai/ha visibly injured peanut and reduced canopy width”
Claim · model-written summary
Injury from PPI flumetsulam at 0.07 kg/ha or less was no worse than the standard bentazon plus paraquat treatment.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- PPI flumetsulam at 0.07 kg/ha or lesse2
- Outcome
- injurye2
- Direction
- no worsee2
- Comparator
- bentazon (0.6 kg ai/ha) plus paraquat (0.14 kg ai/ha)e2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field studies were conducted at Tifton, GA to quantify phytotoxicity of flumetsulam on peanut as influenced by application rate and timing in a weed free experiment”
e2“injury from PPI flumetsulam at 0.07 kg/ha or less was no worse than a standard early postemergence (EPOST) treatment of bentazon (0.6 kg ai/ha) plus paraquat (0.14 kg ai/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
EPOST flumetsulam up to 0.07 kg/ha reduced peanut canopy width.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Flumetsulam EPOST at rates up to 0.07 kg/hae3
- Outcome
- canopy widthe3
- Direction
- reducede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field studies were conducted at Tifton, GA to quantify phytotoxicity of flumetsulam on peanut as influenced by application rate and timing in a weed free experiment”
e3“Flumetsulam EPOST at rates up to 0.07 kg/ha visibly injured peanut and reduced peanut canopy width”
Claim · model-written summary
EPOST flumetsulam at 0.035 kg/ha caused injury similar to bentazon plus paraquat.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- rates of 0.035 kg/ha EPOSTe4
- Outcome
- injurye4
- Direction
- similare4
- Comparator
- bentazon plus paraquate4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field studies were conducted at Tifton, GA to quantify phytotoxicity of flumetsulam on peanut as influenced by application rate and timing in a weed free experiment”
e4“Flumetsulam injury at rates of 0.035 kg/ha EPOST was similar to that caused by bentazon plus paraquat”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined PPI and EPOST flumetsulam reduced early and mid-season pod and foliage biomass more than either application alone.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- Interactive effects of PPI and EPOST flumetsulame5
- Outcome
- early and mid-season pod and foliage biomasse5
- Direction
- reducede5
- Qualifier
- more than either application alonee5
- Comparator
- either application alonee5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field studies were conducted at Tifton, GA to quantify phytotoxicity of flumetsulam on peanut as influenced by application rate and timing in a weed free experiment”
e5“Interactive effects of PPI and EPOST flumetsulam reduced early and mid-season pod and foliage biomass more than either application alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Final peanut yields were not affected by flumetsulam, regardless of rate or timing.
- Taxon
- peanutArachis hypogaeae6
- Treatment
- flumetsulame6
- Outcome
- final yieldse6
- Direction
- not affectede6
- Qualifier
- regardless of rate or time of applicatione6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Field studies were conducted at Tifton, GA to quantify phytotoxicity of flumetsulam on peanut as influenced by application rate and timing in a weed free experiment”
e6“However, peanut recovered with final yields not affected by flumetsulam, regardless of rate or time of application”
The same questions in other papers
herbicide · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →herbicide · crop injury · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
23 papers more in this group
See all 27 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.