Paper · 2016 · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORESTRY AND CROP IMPROVEMENT

Influence of organic manures, micronutrients and arbuscular mycoriza on quality parameters of (maize and sunflower) under residual effect of maize- sunflower cropping system

G. MARIAPPAN; M. MOHAMED AMANULLAH; T. ANANTHI; et al.

6
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to study the influence of organic manures, micronutrients and arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) on the productivity of maize-sunflower cropping system at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during 2011-12 and 2012-13. The experiment was laid out in Split Plot Design and replicated thrice for maize during winter 2011-12 and 2012-13 and the same experiment after dividing each plot into two was laid out in Split-split Plot Design with three replications for sunflower during summer 2012 and 2013 to estimate the residual effects of organic manures in maize, the results revealed that among the organic manures, poultry manure @ 5 t ha -1 with RDF recorded significantly enhanced quality parameter like crude protein and starch content in maize followed by application of sericulture waste @ 5 t ha -1 with RDF. Among the micronutrients and AM, ZnSO 4 @ 37.5 kg ha -1 recorded significantly crude protein and starch content followed by application of followed by TNAU MN mixture. In sunflower, better oil yield and oil quality were recorded with application poultry manure @ 5 t ha -1 with RDF to preceding maize followed by sericulture waste @ 5 t ha -1 with RDF to preceding maize. The same trend was also noticed in the second year crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure at 5 t/ha with RDF significantly enhanced crude protein and starch content in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
poultry manure @ 5 t ha -1 with RDFe2
Outcome
crude protein and starch contente2
Direction
enhancede2
Setting
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoree3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to estimate the residual effects of organic manures in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–594 · show in text ↑
e2

“poultry manure @ 5 t ha -1 with RDF recorded significantly enhanced quality parameter like crude protein and starch content in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–781 · show in text ↑
e3

“at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during 2011-12 and 2012-13”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–253 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sericulture waste at 5 t/ha with RDF ranked second to poultry manure in enhancing crude protein and starch content of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
sericulture waste @ 5 t ha -1 with RDFe4
Outcome
crude protein and starch contente2
Direction
followed bye4
Comparator
poultry manure @ 5 t ha -1 with RDFe2
Setting
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoree3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to estimate the residual effects of organic manures in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–594 · show in text ↑
e2

“poultry manure @ 5 t ha -1 with RDF recorded significantly enhanced quality parameter like crude protein and starch content in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–781 · show in text ↑
e3

“at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during 2011-12 and 2012-13”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–253 · show in text ↑
e4

“followed by application of sericulture waste @ 5 t ha -1 with RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ZnSO4 at 37.5 kg/ha significantly increased crude protein and starch content in maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
ZnSO 4 @ 37.5 kg ha -1e5
Outcome
crude protein and starch contente5
Direction
increaseinferrede5
Setting
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoree3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to estimate the residual effects of organic manures in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–594 · show in text ↑
e3

“at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during 2011-12 and 2012-13”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–253 · show in text ↑
e5

“ZnSO 4 @ 37.5 kg ha -1 recorded significantly crude protein and starch content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–960 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TNAU MN mixture ranked second to ZnSO4 at 37.5 kg/ha in crude protein and starch content of maize.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
TNAU MN mixturee6
Outcome
crude protein and starch contente5
Direction
followed bye6
Comparator
ZnSO 4 @ 37.5 kg ha -1e5
Setting
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoree3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“to estimate the residual effects of organic manures in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 534–594 · show in text ↑
e3

“at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during 2011-12 and 2012-13”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–253 · show in text ↑
e5

“ZnSO 4 @ 37.5 kg ha -1 recorded significantly crude protein and starch content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–960 · show in text ↑
e6

“followed by application of followed by TNAU MN mixture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1015 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Poultry manure at 5 t/ha with RDF applied to the preceding maize gave better oil yield and oil quality in sunflower; the trend also held in the second year.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse7
Treatment
poultry manure @ 5 t ha -1 with RDF to preceding maizee7
Outcome
oil yield and oil qualitye7
Direction
bettere7
Qualifier
The same trend was also noticed in the second year crope0
Setting
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoree3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during 2011-12 and 2012-13”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–253 · show in text ↑
e7

“In sunflower, better oil yield and oil quality were recorded with application poultry manure @ 5 t ha -1 with RDF to preceding maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1149 · show in text ↑
e0

“The same trend was also noticed in the second year crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sericulture waste at 5 t/ha with RDF applied to the preceding maize ranked second to poultry manure for oil yield and oil quality in sunflower.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse7
Treatment
sericulture waste @ 5 t ha -1 with RDF to preceding maizee0
Outcome
oil yield and oil qualitye7
Direction
followed bye0
Comparator
poultry manure @ 5 t ha -1 with RDF to preceding maizee7
Setting
Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatoree3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore during 2011-12 and 2012-13”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–253 · show in text ↑
e7

“In sunflower, better oil yield and oil quality were recorded with application poultry manure @ 5 t ha -1 with RDF to preceding maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1149 · show in text ↑
e0

“followed by sericulture waste @ 5 t ha -1 with RDF to preceding maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1219 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · quality: oil · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results differ

89 papers: 76 positive, 13 negative or no effect

75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 236 positive, 26 negative or no effect

235 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.