Paper · 2016 · Australian Journal of Crop Science

Agriculture and forest: A sustainable strategy in the Brazilian Amazon

Embrapa Eastern Amazon, Belém, Pará, Brazil; Lucieta Guerreiro Martorano; Marco Antonio Siviero; et al.

10
claims
13
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Large-scale agriculture is increasing in anthropogenically modified areas in the Amazon Basin. Crops such as soybean, maize, oil palm, and others are being introduced to supply the world demand for food and energy. However, the current challenge is to enhance the sustainability of these areas by increasing efficiency of production chains and to improve environmental services. The Amazon Basin has experienced a paradigm shift away from the traditional slash-and-burn agricultural practices, which offers decision makers the opportunity to make innovative interventions to enhance the productivity in previously degraded areas by using trees to ecological advantage. This study describes a successful experiment integrating the production of soybean and paric (Glycine max L. and Schizolobium amazonicum) based on previous research that indicated potential topoclimatic zones for planting paric in the Brazilian state of Par. This paper shows that a no-tillage system reduces the effects of drought compared to conventional tillage still used by many farmers in the region. The integrated system was implemented during the 2014/2015 season in 234.6 ha in the high-potential zone in the municipality of Ulianpolis, Par. Both soybean and paric were planted simultaneously. Paric was planted in 5 m x 2 m inter-tree spacing totaling 228x10 3 trees per hectare and soybean, in 4 m x 100 m spacing, distributed in nine rows with a 0.45 m inter-row distance, occupying 80% of the area. The harvested soybean production was 3.4 t ha -1 , higher than other soybean monocultures in eastern Par. Paric benefited from soybean fertilization in the first year: It exhibited rapid development in height (3.26 m) and average diameter (3.85 cm). Trees and crop rotation over the following years is six years for forest species and one year for each crop. Our results confirm there are alternatives to the current production systems able to diminish negative impacts resulting from monoculture. In addition, the system provided environmental services such as reduced soil erosion and increased carbon stock by soil cover with no-tillage soybean cultivation. The soybean cover contributes to increased paric thermal regulation and lower forestry costs. We concluded that innovative interventions are important to show local farmers that it is possible to adapt an agroforest system to large-scale production, thus changing the Amazon.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage reduced drought effects relative to conventional tillage.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Treatment
no-tillage systeme0
Outcome
effects of droughte0
Direction
reducese0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a no-tillage system reduces the effects of drought compared to conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1033 · show in text ↑
t0

“production of soybean and paric”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–761 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated soybean yielded 3.4 t ha -1, higher than monocultures in eastern Par.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
soybean productione0
Direction
highere0
Value
3.4 t ha -1e0
Comparator
other soybean monoculturese0
Setting
eastern Pare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The harvested soybean production was 3.4 t ha -1 , higher than other soybean monocultures in eastern Par.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1587 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paric reached 3.26 m in height in the first year, benefiting from soybean fertilization.

Taxon
Parice0
Organ / stage
first yeare0
Treatment
soybean fertilizatione0
Outcome
heighte0
Direction
rapid developmente0
Value
3.26 me0

Verbatim

e0

“Paric benefited from soybean fertilization in the first year: It exhibited rapid development in height (3.26 m) and average diameter (3.85 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1731 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paric reached 3.85 cm average diameter in the first year.

Taxon
Parice0
Organ / stage
first yeare0
Treatment
soybean fertilizatione0
Outcome
average diametere0
Direction
rapid developmente0
Value
3.85 cme0

Verbatim

e0

“Paric benefited from soybean fertilization in the first year: It exhibited rapid development in height (3.26 m) and average diameter (3.85 cm).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1731 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated system reduced adverse monoculture impacts.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
negative impacts resulting from monoculturee0
Direction
diminishe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alternatives to the current production systems able to diminish negative impacts resulting from monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1871–1978 · show in text ↑
t0

“production of soybean and paric”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage soybean cover reduced soil erosion.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
soil cover with no-tillage soybean cultivatione0
Outcome
soil erosione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced soil erosion and increased carbon stock by soil cover with no-tillage soybean cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tillage soybean cover increased soil carbon stock.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
soil cover with no-tillage soybean cultivatione0
Outcome
carbon stocke0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced soil erosion and increased carbon stock by soil cover with no-tillage soybean cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2044–2141 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean cover increased thermal regulation for paric.

Taxon
parice0
Treatment
soybean covere0
Outcome
paric thermal regulatione0
Direction
increasede0

Verbatim

e0

“The soybean cover contributes to increased paric thermal regulation and lower forestry costs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2143–2236 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soybean cover lowered forestry costs.

Taxon
parice0
Treatment
soybean covere0
Outcome
forestry costse0
Direction
lowere0

Verbatim

e0

“The soybean cover contributes to increased paric thermal regulation and lower forestry costs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2143–2236 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded agroforestry could adapt to large scale production.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Outcome
adapt an agroforest system to large-scale productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it is possible to adapt an agroforest system to large-scale production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2321–2391 · show in text ↑
t0

“production of soybean and paric”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–761 · show in text ↑

tillage · soil: chemistry · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 24 positive, 12 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.