Abstract
A field experiment was conducted for 2 yr near Scottsbluff, NE, to evaluate the growth and yield response of nine commercial sugarbeet cultivars to five postemergence herbicide mixtures applied two times. Sugarbeet cultivars varied in their response to herbicides. Three of the five postemergence herbicide mixtures reduced sugarbeet leaf area at 9 wk after planting (WAP), while two treatments had no significant effect. Root yield reductions from herbicide treatments ranged from 3 to 11% averaged over the nine cultivars. Two applications of desmedipham plus phenmedipham at 180 plus 180 g/ha reduced root yield 3% compared to untreated plots. Two applications of clopyralid at 100 g/ha, triflusulfuron at 18 g/ha, or ethofumesate at 160 g/ha plus desmedipham plus phenmedipham resulted in a 17, 29, and 22% reduction in leaf area at 9 WAR respectively, and a 6, 8, and 6% reduction in root yield, respectively, compared to untreated plots. Sethoxydim at 280 g/ha plus desmedipham plus phenmedipham did not cause additional sugarbeet injury.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Sugarbeet cultivars varied in herbicide response.
- Taxon
- Sugarbeet
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0 - Outcome
- response to herbicidese0
- Direction
- variede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sugarbeet cultivars varied in their response to herbicides.”
Claim · model-written summary
Three herbicide mixtures reduced sugarbeet leaf area at nine weeks.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- Three of the five postemergence herbicide mixturese0
- Outcome
- sugarbeet leaf areae0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Qualifier
- 9 wk after planting (WAP)e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three of the five postemergence herbicide mixtures reduced sugarbeet leaf area at 9 wk after planting (WAP), while two treatments had no significant effect.”
Claim · model-written summary
Two herbicide treatments had no significant leaf-area effect.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- two treatmentse0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- no significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Three of the five postemergence herbicide mixtures reduced sugarbeet leaf area at 9 wk after planting (WAP), while two treatments had no significant effect.”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide treatments reduced root yield by 3 to 11% across cultivars.
- Taxon
- SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- herbicide treatmentse0
- Outcome
- Root yielde0
- Direction
- reductionse0
- Value
- 3 to 11%e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugarbeet”
e0“Root yield reductions from herbicide treatments ranged from 3 to 11% averaged over the nine cultivars.”
Claim · model-written summary
Desmedipham plus phenmedipham reduced root yield by 3%.
- Taxon
- SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Two applications of desmedipham plus phenmedipham at 180 plus 180 g/hae0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 3%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugarbeet”
e0“Two applications of desmedipham plus phenmedipham at 180 plus 180 g/ha reduced root yield 3% compared to untreated plots.”
Claim · model-written summary
Clopyralid mixture reduced leaf area by 17%.
- Taxon
- SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- clopyralid at 100 g/hae0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 17, 29, and 22%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugarbeet”
e0“Two applications of clopyralid at 100 g/ha, triflusulfuron at 18 g/ha, or ethofumesate at 160 g/ha plus desmedipham plus phenmedipham resulted in a 17, 29, and 22% reduction in leaf area at 9 WAR respectively, and a 6, 8, and 6% reduction in root yield, respectively, compared to untreated plots.”
Claim · model-written summary
Triflusulfuron mixture reduced leaf area by 29%.
- Taxon
- SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- triflusulfuron at 18 g/hae0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 17, 29, and 22%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugarbeet”
e0“Two applications of clopyralid at 100 g/ha, triflusulfuron at 18 g/ha, or ethofumesate at 160 g/ha plus desmedipham plus phenmedipham resulted in a 17, 29, and 22% reduction in leaf area at 9 WAR respectively, and a 6, 8, and 6% reduction in root yield, respectively, compared to untreated plots.”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethofumesate mixture reduced leaf area by 22%.
- Taxon
- SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- ethofumesate at 160 g/ha plus desmedipham plus phenmediphame0
- Outcome
- leaf areae0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 22%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugarbeet”
e0“Two applications of clopyralid at 100 g/ha, triflusulfuron at 18 g/ha, or ethofumesate at 160 g/ha plus desmedipham plus phenmedipham resulted in a 17, 29, and 22% reduction in leaf area at 9 WAR respectively, and a 6, 8, and 6% reduction in root yield, respectively, compared to untreated plots.”
Claim · model-written summary
Clopyralid mixture reduced root yield by 6%.
- Taxon
- SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- clopyralid at 100 g/hae0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 6%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugarbeet”
e0“Two applications of clopyralid at 100 g/ha, triflusulfuron at 18 g/ha, or ethofumesate at 160 g/ha plus desmedipham plus phenmedipham resulted in a 17, 29, and 22% reduction in leaf area at 9 WAR respectively, and a 6, 8, and 6% reduction in root yield, respectively, compared to untreated plots.”
Claim · model-written summary
Triflusulfuron mixture reduced root yield by 8%.
- Taxon
- SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- triflusulfuron at 18 g/hae0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 6, 8, and 6%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugarbeet”
e0“Two applications of clopyralid at 100 g/ha, triflusulfuron at 18 g/ha, or ethofumesate at 160 g/ha plus desmedipham plus phenmedipham resulted in a 17, 29, and 22% reduction in leaf area at 9 WAR respectively, and a 6, 8, and 6% reduction in root yield, respectively, compared to untreated plots.”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethofumesate mixture reduced root yield by 6%.
- Taxon
- SugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarist0
- Treatment
- ethofumesate at 160 g/ha plus desmedipham plus phenmediphame0
- Outcome
- root yielde0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Value
- 6%e0
- Comparator
- untreated plotse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Sugarbeet”
e0“Two applications of clopyralid at 100 g/ha, triflusulfuron at 18 g/ha, or ethofumesate at 160 g/ha plus desmedipham plus phenmedipham resulted in a 17, 29, and 22% reduction in leaf area at 9 WAR respectively, and a 6, 8, and 6% reduction in root yield, respectively, compared to untreated plots.”
Claim · model-written summary
Sethoxydim addition caused no additional sugarbeet injury.
- Taxon
- sugarbeetBeta vulgaris subsp. vulgarise0
- Treatment
- Sethoxydim at 280 g/ha plus desmedipham plus phenmediphame0
- Outcome
- sugarbeet injurye0
- Direction
- did not cause additionale0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sethoxydim at 280 g/ha plus desmedipham plus phenmedipham did not cause additional sugarbeet injury.”
The same questions in other papers
ethofumesate · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →clopyralid · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
desmedipham · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
triflusulfuron · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
ethofumesate · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
triflusulfuron · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →phenmedipham · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →desmedipham · crop injury · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.