Paper · 2014 · Agrotechnology

Photosynthetic Efficiency Promotion of Sugar Beet by Formulation of Trichoderma and Control of Some Sugar Beet Disease Seedling

Heidi I.G Abo-Elnaga

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Four isolates of Fusarium sambucinum (Fuckel ) (isolates 1,2,3,4)and four isolates of Fusarium solani ( Mart.) Sacc . (isolates5, 6, 7, 8)were isolated from different localities of sugar beet in Assiut Government .The tested isolated were pathogenic to sugar beet oskarpoly variety causing damping off and root rot. Isolates 2 and5 had the highest pathogen city to sugar beet isolates 3 and 8 had the lowest pathogen city pathogen city. Trichoderma viride have been used for their potential antagonism for controlling Fusarium sp damping off and root rot disease of sugar beet. In vitro studies showed that the culture filtrate of Trichoderma viride significantly decreased the growth of the tested isolates of both Fusarium sambucinum and Fusarium solani Treating the soil with formulation of Trichoderma viride before planting decreased damping off and root rot of sugar beet compared with untreated and untreated soil with formulation of Trichoderma viride under greenhouse conditions during growing seasons 2010and 2011.Chlorophyll a chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll carotenoids decreased when treatment the infested soil with either Fusarium sambucinum or Fusarium solani compared with untreated and untreated soil with formulation of Trichoderma viride.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fusarium isolates caused damping off and root rot in sugar beet oskarpoly.

Material
oskarpoly varietye0
Interactor
Fusarium sambucinumFusarium sambucinume0pathogen
Outcome
damping off and root rote0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four isolates of Fusarium sambucinum (Fuckel ) (isolates 1,2,3,4)and four isolates of Fusarium solani ( Mart.) Sacc . (isolates5, 6, 7, 8)were isolated from different localities of sugar beet in Assiut Government .The tested isolated were pathogenic to sugar beet oskarpoly variety causing damping off and root rot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Promotion of Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolates 2 and 5 had the highest pathogenicity to sugar beet.

Material
Isolates 2 and5e0
Outcome
highest pathogen citye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolates 2 and5 had the highest pathogen city to sugar beet isolates 3 and 8 had the lowest pathogen city pathogen city.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–436 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Isolates 3 and 8 had the lowest pathogenicity to sugar beet.

Material
isolates 3 and 8e0
Outcome
lowest pathogen citye0
Direction
loweste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Isolates 2 and5 had the highest pathogen city to sugar beet isolates 3 and 8 had the lowest pathogen city pathogen city.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–436 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride culture filtrate significantly reduced Fusarium sambucinum growth in vitro.

Treatment
culture filtrate of Trichoderma viridee0
Interactor
Fusarium sambucinumFusarium sambucinume0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of the tested isolates of both Fusarium sambucinum and Fusarium solanie0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · Second interactorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro studies showed that the culture filtrate of Trichoderma viride significantly decreased the growth of the tested isolates of both Fusarium sambucinum and Fusarium solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“Promotion of Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Trichoderma viride culture filtrate significantly reduced Fusarium solani growth in vitro.

Treatment
culture filtrate of Trichoderma viridee0
Interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
Second interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth of the tested isolates of both Fusarium sambucinum and Fusarium solanie0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · Second interactorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In vitro studies showed that the culture filtrate of Trichoderma viride significantly decreased the growth of the tested isolates of both Fusarium sambucinum and Fusarium solani”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“Promotion of Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preplant Trichoderma viride soil treatment reduced sugar beet damping off and root rot in greenhouse trials.

Treatment
formulation of Trichoderma viride before plantinge0
Interactor
Trichoderma virideTrichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
damping off and root rot of sugar beete0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
untreatede0
Setting
greenhouse conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viride · InteractorKatja Schulz · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treating the soil with formulation of Trichoderma viride before planting decreased damping off and root rot of sugar beet compared with untreated and untreated soil with formulation of Trichoderma viride under greenhouse conditions during growing seasons 2010and 2011.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–1024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation with Fusarium sambucinum decreased sugar beet chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll relative to untreated soil.

Treatment
infested soil with either Fusarium sambucinum or Fusarium solanie0
Interactor
Fusarium sambucinumFusarium sambucinume0pathogen
Outcome
Chlorophyll a chlorophyll b and total chlorophylle0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
untreatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll a chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll carotenoids decreased when treatment the infested soil with either Fusarium sambucinum or Fusarium solani compared with untreated and untreated soil with formulation of Trichoderma viride.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Promotion of Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation with Fusarium sambucinum decreased sugar beet carotenoids relative to untreated soil.

Treatment
infested soil with either Fusarium sambucinum or Fusarium solanie0
Interactor
Fusarium sambucinumFusarium sambucinume0pathogen
Outcome
carotenoidse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
untreatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll a chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll carotenoids decreased when treatment the infested soil with either Fusarium sambucinum or Fusarium solani compared with untreated and untreated soil with formulation of Trichoderma viride.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Promotion of Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation with Fusarium solani decreased sugar beet chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll relative to untreated soil.

Treatment
infested soil with either Fusarium sambucinum or Fusarium solanie0
Interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
Outcome
Chlorophyll a chlorophyll b and total chlorophylle0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
untreatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll a chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll carotenoids decreased when treatment the infested soil with either Fusarium sambucinum or Fusarium solani compared with untreated and untreated soil with formulation of Trichoderma viride.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Promotion of Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation with Fusarium solani decreased sugar beet carotenoids relative to untreated soil.

Treatment
infested soil with either Fusarium sambucinum or Fusarium solanie0
Interactor
Fusarium solaniFusarium solanie0pathogen
Outcome
carotenoidse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
untreatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium solani
Fusarium solani · InteractorFred Brooks from United States University of Hawaii at Manoa · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chlorophyll a chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll carotenoids decreased when treatment the infested soil with either Fusarium sambucinum or Fusarium solani compared with untreated and untreated soil with formulation of Trichoderma viride.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1262 · show in text ↑
t0

“Promotion of Sugar Beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–49 · show in text ↑

Trichoderma viride · Fusarium solani · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

infection · physiology: pigments · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.