Paper · 1992 · Australian Journal of Botany

Influence of Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentrations on Plant Nutrition

JP Conroy

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
196
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The rising levels of atmospheric CO2 are likely to increase biomass production of C3 species in both natural and managed ecosystems because photosynthetic rates will be higher. The greatest absolute increase in productivity will occur when nitrogen and phosphorus availability in the soil is high. Low nitrogen does not preclude a growth response to high CO2, whereas some C3 species fail to respond to high CO2 when phosphorus is low, possibly because insufficient phosphorus is available to maintain maximum photosynthetic activity at high CO2. C3 plants response to high CO2 because the flux of carbon through the photoreductive cycle is increased and photorespiration is suppressed. This change in metabolism appears to alter the foliar nutrient concentration required to promote maximum productivity (critical concentration). Higher phosphorus concentrations are needed at elevated CO2, whereas the nitrogen requirement is reduced by CO2 enrichment. Since critical concentrations are used to evaluate nutrient status of crop and forest species and to manage fertiliser programs, they will need reassessing as the atmospheric CO2 concentration rises. Another consequence of the altered nutrient requirement at high CO2 is that the nitrogen concentrations of foliage, roots and grain are consistently lower in plants grown at elevated CO2, irrespective of availability of nitrogen in the soil. In natural ecosystems, the lower nitrogen to carbon ratio of the litter may alter rates of nutrient cycling. For farmers, the rising CO2 concentrations could cause reductions in grain nitrogen, and therefore protein content. This could have important implications for baking quality of hard wheats as well as affecting the nutrient value of grain such as rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Mechanismauthor interpretationreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 is expected to increase biomass production of C3 species through higher photosynthesis.

Taxon
C3 speciese0
Treatment
rising levels of atmospheric CO2e0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
photosynthetic rates will be highere0

Verbatim

e0

“rising levels of atmospheric CO2 are likely to increase biomass production of C3 species in both natural and managed ecosystems because photosynthetic rates will be higher”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 4–175 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest productivity increase is expected at high soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability.

Taxon
C3 speciese2
Compound
nitrogen and phosphoruse0
Outcome
productivitye0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
availability in the soil is highe0

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest absolute increase in productivity will occur when nitrogen and phosphorus availability in the soil is high.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–297 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“biomass production of C3 species in both natural and managed ecosystems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrogen does not prevent a growth response to high CO2.

Taxon
C3 speciese2
Compound
nitrogene0
Outcome
growth responsee0
Direction
growth responsee0

Verbatim

e0

“Low nitrogen does not preclude a growth response to high CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 298–358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“biomass production of C3 species in both natural and managed ecosystems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 60–131 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedreview summaryno effectbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Some C3 species fail to respond to high CO2 when phosphorus is low.

Taxon
C3 speciese0
Compound
phosphoruse0
Outcome
respond to high CO2e0
Direction
fail to responde0

Verbatim

e0

“some C3 species fail to respond to high CO2 when phosphorus is low”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–434 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Higher phosphorus concentrations are required at elevated CO2.

Taxon
Plantt0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
phosphorus concentrationse0
Direction
Highere0

Verbatim

e0

“Higher phosphorus concentrations are needed at elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 enrichment reduces nitrogen requirement.

Taxon
Plantt0
Treatment
CO2 enrichmente0
Outcome
nitrogen requiremente0
Direction
reducede0

Verbatim

e0

“the nitrogen requirement is reduced by CO2 enrichment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–953 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedreview summarynegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar, root and grain nitrogen concentrations are lower under elevated CO2 regardless of soil nitrogen availability.

Taxon
plantsViridiplantaee0
Treatment
elevated CO2e0
Outcome
nitrogen concentrations of foliage, roots and graine0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the nitrogen concentrations of foliage, roots and grain are consistently lower in plants grown at elevated CO2, irrespective of availability of nitrogen in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1395 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationreview summarybasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Critical nutrient concentrations should be reassessed as atmospheric CO2 rises.

Taxon
crop and forest speciese2
Outcome
reassessinge0

Verbatim

e0

“they will need reassessing as the atmospheric CO2 concentration rises”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1153 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 · show in text ↑
e2

“critical concentrations are used to evaluate nutrient status of crop and forest species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1048 · show in text ↑