Paper · 2016 · Journal of Life Sciences

Techniques of Domestication and Carbon Sequestration of Jatropha curcas Associated with Vigna unguiculata in Marginal Soil of Garoua Region, Cameroon

Tchobsala; Megueni Clautilde; Souare Konsala; et al.

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
11
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

In order to reduce the increase of fuel prices, and improve the living conditions of the population, a study was carried out by Convention No. 1/IRAD/PCS ESA2-SDCC in the region of Garoua in Cameroon. The study aimed to characterize the behaviour of J. curcas associated with V. unguiculata in marginal soils in the Sahel region in order to improve the livelihoods of the farmers and promote its domestication in rural areas. It also aimed at pointing out the influence of two implantation techniques of J. curcas on the germination, the different quantities of NPK and cow dung, planting techniques and association with V. unguiculata var. lori on growth parameters of development and yield of J. curcas on the degraded marginal soils in the region. The experimental design was a completely randomized block with five levels of fertilization (F0: control; F1: 50 g; F2: 100 g of NPK 15-20-15; F3: 1 kg and 2 kg of cow dung) per plant. Two types of establishment propagator (Ge) and direct seedling (Se) with three replications were used. Data were analysed by Stratigraphic + and XLSTAT. Results showed that the propagator germination was higher than the direct seeding, 95% and 40% respectively. The Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of the parameters of growths and yield of J. curcas showed high correlation between the production of the leaves and the length of the leaves (R = 0.861; P 0.001). These parameters were correlated with the Biplot (F1 and F2) to 53.24%. It was opposed to the positives and imperfect correlation between the height and the recover parameters (R = 0.486; P 0.05). The treatments 100 g of NPK per plant and 2 kg of cow dung per plant induced strongly the development and yield of J. curcas and V. unguiculata adapted to marginal soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Propagator germination exceeded direct seeding, 95% versus 40%.

Taxon
Jatropha curcasJatropha curcast0
Treatment
propagatore0
Outcome
germinatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
95%e0
Qualifier
40%e0
Comparator
direct seedinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“propagator germination was higher than the direct seeding, 95% and 40% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1196 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 56–71 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf production and leaf length were highly correlated in J. curcas.

Taxon
J. curcasJatropha curcase1
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
production of the leavese0
Value
R = 0.861e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high correlation between the production of the leaves and the length of the leaves (R = 0.861; P 0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1296–1399 · show in text ↑
e1

“growths and yield of J. curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1288 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The growth and yield parameters correlated with the PCA biplot at 53.24%.

Taxon
J. curcasJatropha curcase1
Outcome
These parameterse0
Value
53.24%e0
Comparator
Biplot (F1 and F2)e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These parameters were correlated with the Biplot (F1 and F2) to 53.24%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1471 · show in text ↑
e1

“growths and yield of J. curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1288 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Height and recover parameters had a positive imperfect correlation.

Taxon
J. curcasJatropha curcase1
Outcome
heighte0
Value
R = 0.486e0
Comparator
recover parameterse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“positives and imperfect correlation between the height and the recover parameters (R = 0.486; P 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1596 · show in text ↑
e1

“growths and yield of J. curcas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 g NPK per plant strongly induced development and yield of J. curcas and V. unguiculata.

Taxon
J. curcas and V. unguiculataVigna unguiculataJatropha curcase0
Treatment
100 g of NPK per plante0
Outcome
development and yielde0
Direction
induced stronglye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments 100 g of NPK per plant and 2 kg of cow dung per plant induced strongly the development and yield of J. curcas and V. unguiculata adapted to marginal soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2 kg cow dung per plant strongly induced development and yield of J. curcas and V. unguiculata.

Taxon
J. curcas and V. unguiculataVigna unguiculataJatropha curcase0
Treatment
2 kg of cow dung per plante0
Outcome
development and yielde0
Direction
induced stronglye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments 100 g of NPK per plant and 2 kg of cow dung per plant induced strongly the development and yield of J. curcas and V. unguiculata adapted to marginal soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1598–1767 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Jatropha curcasPositive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.