Paper · 1986 · HortScience

Effect of Ethephon and GA3 on Time of Flowering in Peach

T. J. Gianfagna; R. Marini; S. Rachmiel

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
31
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Ethephon at 200 ppm applied to ‘Cresthaven’ peach trees [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] in October delayed flowering by 7 days in the first year of this study, but only by 3 days in the 2nd year. Flower bud survival was reduced in both years by this treatment, although the percentage of fruit set increased. The differences observed in the effectiveness of ethephon in delaying bloom may be due to differences in spring temperatures during bud expansion. High temperatures during the period of bud expansion tended to accelerate bud development, minimizing the effect of treatment, whereas low temperatures during this period tended to accentuate treatment effects. GA 3 applied in October delayed leaf senescence and abscission, but did not delay flowering.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon at 200 ppm applied in October delayed peach flowering by 7 days in the first year

Treatment
Ethephon at 200 ppme0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
delayede0
Value
7 dayse0
Qualifier
first year of this studye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon at 200 ppm applied to ‘Cresthaven’ peach trees [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] in October delayed flowering by 7 days in the first year of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon at 200 ppm applied in October delayed peach flowering by only 3 days in the second year

Treatment
Ethephon at 200 ppme0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
delayede0
Value
3 dayse1
Qualifier
2nd yeare1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon at 200 ppm applied to ‘Cresthaven’ peach trees [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] in October delayed flowering by 7 days in the first year of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–165 · show in text ↑
e1

“but only by 3 days in the 2nd year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–201 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon at 200 ppm reduced peach flower bud survival in both years

Treatment
Ethephon at 200 ppme0
Outcome
Flower bud survivale2
Direction
reducede2
Qualifier
in both yearse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon at 200 ppm applied to ‘Cresthaven’ peach trees [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] in October delayed flowering by 7 days in the first year of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–165 · show in text ↑
e2

“Flower bud survival was reduced in both years by this treatment, although the percentage of fruit set increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon at 200 ppm increased the percentage of peach fruit set

Treatment
Ethephon at 200 ppme0
Outcome
percentage of fruit sete2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon at 200 ppm applied to ‘Cresthaven’ peach trees [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] in October delayed flowering by 7 days in the first year of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–165 · show in text ↑
e2

“Flower bud survival was reduced in both years by this treatment, although the percentage of fruit set increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 203–314 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperatures during bud expansion tended to accelerate peach bud development

Treatment
High temperatures during the period of bud expansione3
Outcome
bud developmente3
Direction
acceleratee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon at 200 ppm applied to ‘Cresthaven’ peach trees [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] in October delayed flowering by 7 days in the first year of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–165 · show in text ↑
e3

“High temperatures during the period of bud expansion tended to accelerate bud development, minimizing the effect of treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 463–588 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low temperatures during bud expansion tended to accentuate peach treatment effects

Treatment
low temperatures during this periode4
Outcome
treatment effectse4
Direction
accentuatee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon at 200 ppm applied to ‘Cresthaven’ peach trees [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] in October delayed flowering by 7 days in the first year of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–165 · show in text ↑
e4

“whereas low temperatures during this period tended to accentuate treatment effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 applied in October delayed leaf senescence and abscission of peach

Treatment
GA 3 applied in Octobere5
Outcome
leaf senescence and abscissione5
Direction
delayede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon at 200 ppm applied to ‘Cresthaven’ peach trees [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] in October delayed flowering by 7 days in the first year of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–165 · show in text ↑
e5

“GA 3 applied in October delayed leaf senescence and abscission, but did not delay flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 applied in October did not delay peach flowering

Treatment
GA 3 applied in Octobere5
Outcome
floweringe5
Direction
did not delaye5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon at 200 ppm applied to ‘Cresthaven’ peach trees [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] in October delayed flowering by 7 days in the first year of this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–165 · show in text ↑
e5

“GA 3 applied in October delayed leaf senescence and abscission, but did not delay flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–765 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · survival · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

17 papers: 8 positive, 9 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Gibberellic acid · phenology · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.