Paper · 1990 · HortScience

AUTUMN EHTREL SPRAYS ON PEACHES; OBSERVATIONS OF WINTER HARDINESS AND BLOOM

Keith Patterson; Curt R. Rom; Robert Bourne; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Ethrel sprays were applied at 50 or 100 ppm at approximately 40%, 70% leaf fall (10/16/89 or 10/24/89, respectively) or at both times on `Redhaven' and `Allgold' peaches. Bud hardiness was determined biweekly by differential thermal analysis (DTA). Stage and percentage of bloom open during the bloom period were subjectively estimated. Spraying trees with 100ppm Ethrel at 50% leaf fall significantly increased bud hardiness at mid-winter compared to other treatments. After a mid-winter freeze (-21.7 C on 12/21/89), there was no significant difference between % bud survival of any treatments. But, trees treated with 50 or 100ppm Ethrel had 10-20% better bud survival than other treatments. Buds of the 2 cultivars had statistically similar hardiness although DTA analysis indicated that Redhaven had a .5-.8 C lower freezing point than Allgold in mid winter. This trend was reversed close to bloom with Allgold having .7 C lower freezing point than Redhaven. The time of full bloom was significantly delayed by treating trees with 100ppm at 40% leaf fall or 50ppm at both 40 and 70% leaf fall the previous autumn.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A 100 ppm Ethrel spray at 50% leaf fall significantly increased midwinter bud hardiness.

Taxon
PEACHESt0
Treatment
100ppm Ethrel at 50% leaf falle0
Outcome
bud hardinesse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying trees with 100ppm Ethrel at 50% leaf fall significantly increased bud hardiness at mid-winter compared to other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–469 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEACHES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After the midwinter freeze, bud survival did not differ significantly across treatments.

Taxon
PEACHESt0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
% bud survivale0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Qualifier
mid-winter freeze (-21.7 C on 12/21/89)e0
Comparator
any treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“After a mid-winter freeze (-21.7 C on 12/21/89), there was no significant difference between % bud survival of any treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–596 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEACHES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees treated with 50 or 100 ppm Ethrel had 10–20% better bud survival.

Taxon
PEACHESt0
Treatment
50 or 100ppm Ethrele0
Outcome
bud survivale0
Direction
bettere0
Value
10-20%e0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“trees treated with 50 or 100ppm Ethrel had 10-20% better bud survival than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEACHES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bud hardiness was statistically similar between the two cultivars.

Taxon
PEACHESt0
Outcome
hardinesse0
Direction
statistically similare0

Verbatim

e0

“Buds of the 2 cultivars had statistically similar hardiness”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEACHES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Redhaven had a 0.5–0.8 C lower midwinter freezing point than Allgold.

Taxon
PEACHESt0
Material
Redhavene0
Outcome
freezing pointe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
.5-.8 Ce0
Comparator
Allgolde0

Verbatim

e0

“Redhaven had a .5-.8 C lower freezing point than Allgold in mid winter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEACHES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Near bloom, Allgold had a 0.7 C lower freezing point than Redhaven.

Taxon
PEACHESt0
Material
Allgolde0
Outcome
freezing pointe0
Direction
lowere0
Value
.7 Ce0
Comparator
Redhavene0

Verbatim

e0

“Allgold having .7 C lower freezing point than Redhaven.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–963 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEACHES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two autumn Ethrel schedules significantly delayed full bloom.

Taxon
PEACHESt0
Treatment
100ppm at 40% leaf fall or 50ppm at both 40 and 70% leaf falle0
Outcome
time of full bloome0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The time of full bloom was significantly delayed by treating trees with 100ppm at 40% leaf fall or 50ppm at both 40 and 70% leaf fall the previous autumn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“PEACHES”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–31 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · survival · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · tolerance: abiotic · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.