Paper · 2016 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Residual effect of herbicides 2,4-D and Glyphosate on soybeans in a Brazilian Cerrado Ultisol

Aparecida Peres-Oliveira Maria; Maria Bonfim-Silva Edna; Estevan de Sousa Geovana; et al.

2
claims
2
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The use of herbicides for weed desiccation is what enables the no-tillage system, which increasingly stimulates the growth of the agrochemical market, in particular the class of herbicides. This study aimed to assess 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and Glyphosate (N-phosphonomethyl-glycine) herbicides mixture persistence in soybeans of Ultisol in the Brazilian Cerrado. The study was conducted in a greenhouse with a randomized blocks design, in a factorial 6×5, being six application times (0, 3, 5, 7, 10 and 14 days before sowing) and five herbicide doses (0, 750, 1500, 2250 and 3000 g a.e. ha-1) in four replications. Herbicides were sprayed with a manual knapsack sprayer. The residual effect was assessed through emergence speed index (ESI), plant height and dry weight of shoots (DWS) and roots (DWR). The residual effect of mixtures of herbicides 2,4-D and Glyphosate on soybean in a Brazilian Cerrado Ultisol showed greater damage to plants when applied at sowing. The doses 2250 and 3000 g a.e. ha-1 were the most severe for the development of soybean plants. Key words: Bioindicator, Glycine max, Herbicide, Persistence.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide mixture caused greater soybean damage when applied at sowing.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
mixtures of herbicides 2,4-D and Glyphosatee0
Outcome
damage to plantse0
Direction
greatere0
Qualifier
when applied at sowinge0
Setting
Brazilian Cerrado Ultisole0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The residual effect of mixtures of herbicides 2,4-D and Glyphosate on soybean in a Brazilian Cerrado Ultisol showed greater damage to plants when applied at sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–974 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2250 and 3000 g a.e. ha-1 doses were most severe for soybean development.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
2250 and 3000 g a.e. ha-1e0
Outcome
development of soybean plantse0
Direction
most severee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The doses 2250 and 3000 g a.e. ha-1 were the most severe for the development of soybean plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 976–1070 · show in text ↑

glyphosate · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    A total glyphosate system better controlled hemp sesbania than PRE-based treatments in first-year soybean.

    Effect of Herbicide Systems on Weed Shifts in Soybean and Cotton · 2005 · compared with PRE herbicides followed by either glyphosate or the conventional herbicide program

    Opposite direction

  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

2,4-D · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

herbicide · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 18 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.