Paper · 2005

EARLY RESPONSE OF SECOND -- ROTATION PINUS PATULA STANDS TO NITROGEN AND PHOSPHATE FERTILIZERS AT SAO HILL FOREST PLANTATION, TANZANIA

S.M.S. Maliondo; E. B Mtui; S.A.O. Chamshama; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Early response of second -- rotation Pinus patula stands to nitrogen and phosphate fertilizers at Sao Hill forest plantations, tanzania. An investigation into the effect of fertilization on second -- rotation Pinus patula stands as an option for increasing growth and yield was initiated in April 1998 at two sites in the Sao Hill forest plantation, Iringa region, southwest Tanzania. Six factorial fertilizer treatments consisting of nitrogen (N) (0, 60 kg N ha -1 ) and phosphorus (P) (0, 30, 60 kg P ha -1 ) were assigned randomly to one-year-old P. patula seedlings in April 1999. Tree heights were measured at 7, 18, 22, 30 and 42 months after out-planting. Diameter at breast height (dbh) was measured from 22 months onwards. At 7 months, seedlings were significantly taller at Ngwazi (0.45 + 0.03 m) than at Msiwasi (0.36 + 0.04 m). In contrast, although not significant, by 42 months trees were slightly taller at Msiwasi (5.00 + 0.37 m) than at Ngwazi (4.87 + 0.46 m). Similarly, height increment measured at 42 months was significantly higher at Msiwasi. Msiwasi had significantly larger dbh trees (1.99 + 0.36 cm) than Ngwazi(1.62 + 0.0.30 cm) at 22 months, but these differences disappeared with time. Neither the application of N nor P had any effect on tree growth at Ngwazi. However, application of N depressed tree survival from 96 to 89% at Msiwasi. Application of P increased diameter and height growth at Msiwasi only. These results further stress the need for developing site-specific recommendations based on research studies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At seven months seedlings at Ngwazi were significantly taller than at Msiwasi.

Taxon
PINUS PATULAPinus patulat0
Outcome
seedlings were significantly tallere0
Direction
tallere0
Value
0.45 + 0.03 me0
Qualifier
0.36 + 0.04 me0
Comparator
Msiwasie0
Setting
Ngwazie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At 7 months, seedlings were significantly taller at Ngwazi (0.45 + 0.03 m) than at Msiwasi (0.36 + 0.04 m)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“PINUS PATULA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 42 months trees at Msiwasi were slightly taller than at Ngwazi, without significance.

Taxon
PINUS PATULAPinus patulat0
Outcome
trees were slightly tallere0
Direction
tallere0
Value
5.00 + 0.37 me0
Qualifier
4.87 + 0.46 me0
Comparator
Ngwazie0
Setting
Msiwasie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“although not significant, by 42 months trees were slightly taller at Msiwasi (5.00 + 0.37 m) than at Ngwazi (4.87 + 0.46 m)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“PINUS PATULA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Height increment at 42 months was significantly higher at Msiwasi.

Taxon
PINUS PATULAPinus patulat0
Outcome
height incremente0
Direction
highere0
Setting
Msiwasie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“height increment measured at 42 months was significantly higher at Msiwasi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1063 · show in text ↑
t0

“PINUS PATULA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 22 months diameter at breast height was significantly larger at Msiwasi than Ngwazi.

Taxon
PINUS PATULAPinus patulat0
Outcome
dbhe0
Direction
largere0
Value
1.99 + 0.36 cme0
Qualifier
1.62 + 0.0.30 cme0
Comparator
Ngwazie0
Setting
Msiwasie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Msiwasi had significantly larger dbh trees (1.99 + 0.36 cm) than Ngwazi(1.62 + 0.0.30 cm) at 22 months”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“PINUS PATULA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The site differences in diameter at breast height disappeared over time.

Taxon
PINUS PATULAPinus patulat0
Outcome
differences disappeared with timee0
Direction
disappearede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these differences disappeared with time”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“PINUS PATULA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application had no effect on tree growth at Ngwazi.

Taxon
PINUS PATULAPinus patulat0
Treatment
application of Ne0
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
nor P had any effecte0
Setting
Ngwazie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither the application of N nor P had any effect on tree growth at Ngwazi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“PINUS PATULA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application had no effect on tree growth at Ngwazi.

Taxon
PINUS PATULAPinus patulat0
Treatment
Pe0
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
had any effecte0
Setting
Ngwazie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither the application of N nor P had any effect on tree growth at Ngwazi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1288 · show in text ↑
t0

“PINUS PATULA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application depressed tree survival from 96 to 89% at Msiwasi.

Taxon
PINUS PATULAPinus patulat0
Treatment
application of Ne0
Outcome
tree survivale0
Direction
depressede0
Value
89%e0
Qualifier
96e0
Setting
Msiwasie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of N depressed tree survival from 96 to 89% at Msiwasi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1365 · show in text ↑
t0

“PINUS PATULA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application increased diameter growth at Msiwasi only.

Taxon
PINUS PATULAPinus patulat0
Treatment
Application of Pe0
Outcome
diametere0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Msiwasie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P increased diameter and height growth at Msiwasi only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“PINUS PATULA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus application increased height growth at Msiwasi only.

Taxon
PINUS PATULAPinus patulat0
Treatment
Application of Pe0
Outcome
height growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Setting
Msiwasie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of P increased diameter and height growth at Msiwasi only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1367–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“PINUS PATULA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend developing site-specific fertilizer recommendations based on research.

Taxon
PINUS PATULAPinus patulat0
Outcome
developing site-specific recommendations based on research studiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“need for developing site-specific recommendations based on research studies”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1471–1546 · show in text ↑
t0

“PINUS PATULA”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Pinus patula (Mexican weeping pine)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

phosphorus · growth · Pinus patula (Mexican weeping pine)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.