Paper · 1993 · South African Forestry Journal

The Amelioration ofPinus patulaMortality on Former Agricultural Sites through Fertilisation: A Bioassay and Greenhouse Study

A. D. Noble; A. W. Schumann

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
4
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SYNOPSIS Recent expansion of the timber industry into areas previously used for agronomic production has, in many cases, resulted in poor growth of Pinus patula and P. elliottii seedlings and in certain instances complete stand failure. A bioassay study was initiated to evaluate the efficacy of soluble fertiliser in ameliorating the allelopathic effects of a water soluble corn (Zea mays) stover extract on the growth of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) seedlings. In addition, a potted trial was undertaken to evaluate the influence of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertiliser sources in overcoming P. patula mortality on soil previously under agricultural production. Lettuce root mass and length was significantly reduced in the presence of the corn stover extract. However, partial recovery in root mass was achieved with additions of a soluble fertiliser. The main effect of fertiliser additions was the stimulation of lettuce shoot growth. The application of 100 mg/kg N to P. patula seedlings grown in pots resulted in highly significant increases in shoot growth. In addition, steam sterilisation and the use of various commercially available fertiliser sources resulted in significant increases in shoot growth over those treatments receiving no fertilisation. No significant response to P additions was observed. Results from foliar analyses clearly indicated that seedlings growing on untreated soil were N deficient (1,05% N). Foliar phosphorus was considered to be sufficient for adequate pine growth. The evidence indicates that the poor performance of P. patula seedlings growing on ex-agricultural lands can be amended by the application of N and that this may be the primary factor affecting stand establishment on these sites.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn stover extract significantly reduced lettuce root mass.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
corn stover extracte0
Outcome
root masse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lettuce root mass and length was significantly reduced in the presence of the corn stover extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–763 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn stover extract significantly reduced lettuce root length.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
corn stover extracte0
Outcome
lengthe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lettuce root mass and length was significantly reduced in the presence of the corn stover extract”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–763 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble fertiliser partially restored lettuce root mass.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae1
Treatment
additions of a soluble fertilisere0
Outcome
root masse0
Direction
partial recoverye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“partial recovery in root mass was achieved with additions of a soluble fertiliser”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–855 · show in text ↑
e1

“lettuce (Lactuca sativa) seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 423–457 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertiliser stimulated lettuce shoot growth.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
fertiliser additionse0
Outcome
lettuce shoot growthe0
Direction
stimulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertiliser additions was the stimulation of lettuce shoot growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly increased pine shoot growth.

Taxon
P. patulaPinus patulae0
Treatment
100 mg/kg Ne0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 100 mg/kg N to P. patula seedlings grown in pots resulted in highly significant increases in shoot growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1066 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Steam sterilisation significantly increased pine shoot growth over no fertilisation.

Taxon
Pinus patulaPinus patulat0
Treatment
steam sterilisatione0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
no fertilisatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“steam sterilisation and the use of various commercially available fertiliser sources resulted in significant increases in shoot growth over those treatments receiving no fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus patula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial fertilisers significantly increased pine shoot growth over no fertilisation.

Taxon
Pinus patulaPinus patulat0
Treatment
various commercially available fertiliser sourcese0
Outcome
shoot growthe0
Direction
increasese0
Comparator
no fertilisatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“various commercially available fertiliser sources resulted in significant increases in shoot growth over those treatments receiving no fertilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus patula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus additions elicited no significant response.

Taxon
Pinus patulaPinus patulat0
Treatment
P additionse0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
No significant responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant response to P additions was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1317 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus patula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated pine seedlings were nitrogen deficient at 1,05% N.

Taxon
Pinus patulaPinus patulat0
Treatment
untreated soile0
Outcome
N deficiente0
Value
1,05% Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seedlings growing on untreated soil were N deficient (1,05% N)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1371–1433 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus patula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar phosphorus was sufficient for pine growth.

Taxon
Pinus patulaPinus patulat0
Outcome
Foliar phosphoruse0
Qualifier
sufficient for adequate pine growthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar phosphorus was considered to be sufficient for adequate pine growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1509 · show in text ↑
t0

“Pinus patula”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–31 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer that nitrogen application can improve poor pine establishment on former agricultural land.

Taxon
P. patulaPinus patulae0
Outcome
amended by the application of Ne0
Setting
ex-agricultural landse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pinus patula
Pinus patula · Taxontereso30 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“poor performance of P. patula seedlings growing on ex-agricultural lands can be amended by the application of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1543–1654 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Pinus patula (Mexican weeping pine)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

248 papers: 202 positive, 46 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 45 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

244 papers more in this group

See all 248 papers →

botanical · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

271 papers: 114 positive, 157 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 114 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

267 papers more in this group

See all 271 papers →

fertilization · growth · Pinus patula (Mexican weeping pine)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.