Abstract
Results: When transplant weight was evaluated 3 weeks after transplanting, the lack of benefit of the additional materials included with the starter fertilizer were apparent (Table 2). With a few exceptions, any transplant water treatment which included 1% 9-18-9 resulted in plants which were significantly larger than treatments receiving water alone. Similarly, plants in treatments which included Remedy, Alpine EXP or Alpine Zinc singly or in combination without starter fertilizer did not significantly differ in size from plants receiving water alone. The same trend was apparent at 35 days after transplanting, but statistical significance was not found in all cases. At both timings, starter fertilizer alone produced plants with the greatest fresh weights. Flowering appeared reduced in many of the treatments with products other than starter fertilizer alone, but data was not collected.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Additional materials included with the starter fertilizer gave no benefit to transplant weight.
- Taxon
- processing tomatot0
- Treatment
- additional materials included with the starter fertilizere1
- Outcome
- transplant weighte0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
t0“on processing tomato establishment and development”
e0“When transplant weight was evaluated 3 weeks after transplanting”
e1“the lack of benefit of the additional materials included with the starter fertilizer were apparent”
Claim · model-written summary
Transplant water with 1% 9-18-9 gave significantly larger plants than water alone.
Verbatim
t0“on processing tomato establishment and development”
e0“When transplant weight was evaluated 3 weeks after transplanting”
e2“With a few exceptions, any transplant water treatment which included 1% 9-18-9 resulted in plants which were significantly larger than treatments receiving water alone”
Claim · model-written summary
Remedy, Alpine EXP and Alpine Zinc, alone or combined without starter fertilizer, did not significantly change plant size compared with water alone.
- Taxon
- processing tomatot0
- Treatment
- Remedy, Alpine EXP or Alpine Zince3
- Outcome
- sizee3
- Qualifier
- without starter fertilizere3
- Comparator
- plants receiving water alonee3
Not reportedDirection
Verbatim
t0“on processing tomato establishment and development”
e3“plants in treatments which included Remedy, Alpine EXP or Alpine Zinc singly or in combination without starter fertilizer did not significantly differ in size from plants receiving water alone”
Claim · model-written summary
The larger-plant trend with 1% 9-18-9 was apparent at 35 days after transplanting, but was not significant in all cases.
Verbatim
t0“on processing tomato establishment and development”
e0“When transplant weight was evaluated 3 weeks after transplanting”
e2“With a few exceptions, any transplant water treatment which included 1% 9-18-9 resulted in plants which were significantly larger than treatments receiving water alone”
e4“The same trend was apparent at 35 days after transplanting, but statistical significance was not found in all cases”
Claim · model-written summary
Starter fertilizer alone gave the greatest fresh weights at both timings.
- Taxon
- processing tomatot0
- Treatment
- starter fertilizer alonee5
- Outcome
- fresh weightse5
- Direction
- greateste5
- Qualifier
- At both timingse5
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“on processing tomato establishment and development”
e5“At both timings, starter fertilizer alone produced plants with the greatest fresh weights”
Claim · model-written summary
Flowering appeared reduced in many treatments with products other than starter fertilizer alone; flowering data were not collected.
- Taxon
- processing tomatot0
- Treatment
- products other than starter fertilizer alonee6
- Outcome
- Floweringe6
- Direction
- reducede6
- Qualifier
- data was not collectede6
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“on processing tomato establishment and development”
e6“Flowering appeared reduced in many of the treatments with products other than starter fertilizer alone, but data was not collected”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
53 papers more in this group
See all 57 papers →fertilization · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
44 papers more in this group
See all 48 papers →fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
566 papers in the same direction as this paper · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
664 papers more in this group
See all 668 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.