Paper · 2016 · Agronomy Journal

Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Yield Response of High Biomass Sorghum in the Lower Midwest

Michael J. W. Maw; James H. Houx; Felix B. Fritschi

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Core Ideas Two‐year study evaluating high biomass sorghum yield response to a broad range of N treatments. A minimal N fertilizer rate of 56 kg ha −1 is needed to increase average ethanol yield to 5519 L ha −1 , with no additional yield benefit at greater N rates. Yields were limited by varying environmental conditions and delayed planting. Nitrogen recovery efficiency were greatest at low N rates, but N use efficiency more stable across N rates, but greatly impacted by environment. High biomass sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] could potentially produce high yields in the midwestern United States with minimal fertilizer inputs. However, little is known about the yield response, N uptake, nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and nitrogen recovery efficiency (NRE) of high biomass sorghum (HBS) at varying N fertilization rates when grown for lignocellulosic ethanol. The objectives of this 2‐yr study were to determine the effect of five N rates (0, 56, 112, 168, 224 kg N ha −1 ) on the dry matter (DM) yield and lignocellulosic ethanol yield (LEY), and the NRE and NUE of two HBS varieties in the midwestern United States. The two varieties responded similarly for most measured parameters. Total DM yield averaged 13.1 Mg ha −1 and estimated LEY averaged 5519 L ha −1 across N rates when grown in central Missouri. Nitrogen rates between 56 and 224 kg N ha −1 resulted in similar DM yield and LEY in 2010, and there were no yield differences among N rates ranging from 0 to 224 kg N ha −1 in 2011. The greatest N removal in DM was at or above 56 kg N ha −1 . Nitrogen recovery efficiency and NUE differed by year, where low rainfall and a shortened growing season in the second year resulted in reduced NRE and NUE. Lack of NUE and DM yield differences at N rates above 56 kg N ha −1 indicates the potential for producing high biomass sorghum with minimal amounts of fertilizer N in the Midwest.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A minimal N fertilizer rate of 56 kg ha-1 increased average ethanol yield to 5519 L ha-1, with no added benefit at greater N rates.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
A minimal N fertilizer rate of 56 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
average ethanol yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5519 L ha −1e0
Comparator
greater N ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“High biomass sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] could potentially produce high yields in the midwestern United States with minimal fertilizer inputs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–640 · show in text ↑
e0

“A minimal N fertilizer rate of 56 kg ha −1 is needed to increase average ethanol yield to 5519 L ha −1 , with no additional yield benefit at greater N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 107–263 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry matter yield averaged 13.1 Mg ha-1 across N rates in central Missouri.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Outcome
Total DM yielde2
Value
13.1 Mg ha −1e2
Qualifier
across N ratese2
Setting
central Missourie2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“High biomass sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] could potentially produce high yields in the midwestern United States with minimal fertilizer inputs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–640 · show in text ↑
e2

“Total DM yield averaged 13.1 Mg ha −1 and estimated LEY averaged 5519 L ha −1 across N rates when grown in central Missouri”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N rates from 56 to 224 kg N ha-1 gave similar dry matter yield and ethanol yield in 2010.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
Nitrogen rates between 56 and 224 kg N ha −1e3
Outcome
DM yield and LEYe3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3
Qualifier
in 2010e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“High biomass sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] could potentially produce high yields in the midwestern United States with minimal fertilizer inputs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–640 · show in text ↑
e3

“Nitrogen rates between 56 and 224 kg N ha −1 resulted in similar DM yield and LEY in 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N rates from 0 to 224 kg N ha-1 gave no yield differences in 2011.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
N rates ranging from 0 to 224 kg N ha −1e4
Outcome
yield differencese4
Direction
no_changeinferrede4
Qualifier
in 2011e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“High biomass sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] could potentially produce high yields in the midwestern United States with minimal fertilizer inputs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–640 · show in text ↑
e4

“there were no yield differences among N rates ranging from 0 to 224 kg N ha −1 in 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1422–1508 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The greatest N removal in dry matter was at or above 56 kg N ha-1.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
at or above 56 kg N ha −1e5
Outcome
N removal in DMe5
Direction
greateste5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“High biomass sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] could potentially produce high yields in the midwestern United States with minimal fertilizer inputs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–640 · show in text ↑
e5

“The greatest N removal in DM was at or above 56 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low rainfall and a shortened growing season in the second year reduced NRE and NUE.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
low rainfall and a shortened growing seasone6
Outcome
NRE and NUEe6
Direction
reducede6
Setting
second yeare6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“High biomass sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] could potentially produce high yields in the midwestern United States with minimal fertilizer inputs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–640 · show in text ↑
e6

“Nitrogen recovery efficiency and NUE differed by year, where low rainfall and a shortened growing season in the second year resulted in reduced NRE and NUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen recovery efficiency was greatest at low N rates.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
low N ratese7
Outcome
Nitrogen recovery efficiencye7
Direction
greateste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“High biomass sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] could potentially produce high yields in the midwestern United States with minimal fertilizer inputs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–640 · show in text ↑
e7

“Nitrogen recovery efficiency were greatest at low N rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 343–400 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N use efficiency was more stable across N rates than nitrogen recovery efficiency but was greatly affected by environment.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Outcome
N use efficiencye7
Direction
more stablee7
Qualifier
greatly impacted by environmente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“High biomass sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] could potentially produce high yields in the midwestern United States with minimal fertilizer inputs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–640 · show in text ↑
e7

“N use efficiency more stable across N rates, but greatly impacted by environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 406–486 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Lack of NUE and yield differences above 56 kg N ha-1 indicates potential for producing high biomass sorghum with minimal N fertilizer.

Taxon
high biomass sorghume7
Outcome
potential for producing high biomass sorghum with minimal amounts of fertilizer Ne7

Verbatim

e7

“Lack of NUE and DM yield differences at N rates above 56 kg N ha −1 indicates the potential for producing high biomass sorghum with minimal amounts of fertilizer N in the Midwest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1728–1906 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two sorghum varieties responded similarly for most measured parameters.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Material
The two varietiese7
Outcome
measured parameterse7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7
Qualifier
for moste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“High biomass sorghum [ Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] could potentially produce high yields in the midwestern United States with minimal fertilizer inputs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–640 · show in text ↑
e7

“The two varieties responded similarly for most measured parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1134–1200 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

92 papers: 80 positive, 12 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

88 papers more in this group

See all 92 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

100 papers: 80 positive, 20 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 23 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.