Abstract
Wheat (Triticum aestivum) is a moderately salt-tolerant crop as well as susceptible to excess application of irrigation water. This requires a proper strategy when crop like wheat is grown under sodic environment. As it is evident that, sodic soils are characterized by a relatively low electrical conductivity (EC), high exchangeable sodium (Na) on exchange sites, soil pH > 8.0, low rate of infiltration, and dispersed soil. Thus, irrigation strategy for wheat in sodic soils differs from normal soils in terms of irrigation depth and irrigation frequency. An experiment to determine the suitable irrigation strategy along with methods of application namely: Surface (farmer's practice), Sprinkler (double nozzle impact sprinkler), and LEWA (Low Energy Water Application) were initiated in the year 2012 for wheat crop. Irrigation depth of 6 cm in case of surface method, and 4 cm in case of sprinkler and LEWA was applied at each irrigation event. The irrigation events based on IW/CPE ratios of 1.0, 0.8 and 0.6 through surface, sprinkler and LEWA methods were imposed. The results revealed that Sprinkler and LEWA resulted in highest wheat yield of 2.4 t/ha to 2.5 t/ha, which was 10 to 20 percent higher than the highest wheat yield recorded under surface irrigated plots by using 30 to 40 percent less water. Hence, use of sprinkling devices to irrigate wheat may not only lead to substantial saving of water as well as energy in terms of fuel used for pumping without compromising the crop yield under sodic enviroonment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Sprinkler and LEWA irrigation gave the highest wheat yield, 2.4 to 2.5 t/ha, in the sodic environment.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- Sprinkler and LEWAe1
- Outcome
- wheat yielde1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 2.4 t/ha to 2.5 t/hae1
- Setting
- sodic environmentt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“under sodic environment”
e1“Sprinkler and LEWA resulted in highest wheat yield of 2.4 t/ha to 2.5 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Sprinkler and LEWA irrigation raised wheat yield 10 to 20 percent above the highest surface-irrigated yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- Sprinkler and LEWAe1
- Outcome
- wheat yielde2
- Direction
- highere2
- Value
- 10 to 20 percente2
- Comparator
- surface irrigated plotse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Sprinkler and LEWA resulted in highest wheat yield of 2.4 t/ha to 2.5 t/ha”
e2“which was 10 to 20 percent higher than the highest wheat yield recorded under surface irrigated plots”
Claim · model-written summary
Sprinkler and LEWA irrigation used 30 to 40 percent less water than surface irrigation.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- Sprinkler and LEWAe1
- Outcome
- watere3
- Direction
- lesse3
- Value
- 30 to 40 percente3
- Comparator
- surface irrigated plotse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Sprinkler and LEWA resulted in highest wheat yield of 2.4 t/ha to 2.5 t/ha”
e2“which was 10 to 20 percent higher than the highest wheat yield recorded under surface irrigated plots”
e3“by using 30 to 40 percent less water”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.