Paper · 2011 · Crop Research

Influence of planting pattern and weed control practices on weedgrowth, nutrient uptake and productivity of sweet corn(Zea mays L.)

N. Sunitha; P. M. Reddy; D. Srinivasulu Reddy

14
claims
36
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during two consecutive seasons of rabi 2004- 05 and 2005-06 at S. V. Agricultural College Farm, Tirupati in the southern agro-climatic zone of Andhra Pradesh to study the effect of different planting patterns (75 x 16 cm, 60 x 20 cm, 75 x 20 cm and 60 x 25 cm) and weed control practices [weedy check, hand weeding (HW) twice at 15 and 30 days after sowing (DAS), pre-emergence application of atrazine @1 kg/ha+HW at 30 DAS, pre-emergence application of atrazine @ 1 kg/ha+postemergence application of paraquat @ 0.5 kg/ha at 30 DAS] on the weed growth and performance of sweet corn. Results revealed that planting pattern of 60 x 20 cm recorded the lowest density, dry weight and nutrient uptake of weeds with the highest leaf area index, dry matter production and nutrient uptake of sweet corn. It was, however, on par with 75 x 16 cm. Though the yield attributes viz., cob length, green cob weight (with husk) and number of kernels/cob were significantly higher with 60 x 25 cm, the narrow row spacing and higher number of 83,333 plants/ha with 60 x 20 cm resulted in the highest yield of green cob (13.9 and 13.1 t/ha) and green fodder (17.6 and 16.7 t/ha) with enhanced monetary returns (benefit : cost ratio of 3.43 and 3.23) during 2004 and 2005, respectively. All the three weed control practices were more or less equally effective in suppressing the weed growth and were superior to weedy check. Integrated weed management practice of pre-emergence application of atrazine @ 1 kg/ha+HW at 30 DAS recorded distinctly lower weed count, dry weight and nutrient uptake of weeds, improved the crop growth stature, yield attributes, in turn resulted in the highest green cob (14.2 and 13.4 t/ha) and fodder yield (18.0 and 17.1 t/ha) of sweet corn, which were found to be at par with pre-emergence application of atrazine @ 1 kg/ha+post-emergence application of paraquat @ 0.5 kg/ha and HW twice at 15 and 30 DAS. Weeds in the best treatment as pre-emergence of atrazine+HW at 30 DAS recorded 42.3, 54.0 and 46.2% lesser uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, respectively, over weedy check during 2004-05, whereas it was lesser to the extent of 47.4, 65.4 and 44.2% during 2005-06.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 x 20 cm pattern had the lowest weed density, dry weight and nutrient uptake.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
60 x 20 cme0
Outcome
density, dry weight and nutrient uptake of weedse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“planting pattern of 60 x 20 cm recorded the lowest density, dry weight and nutrient uptake of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 x 20 cm pattern had the highest sweet corn leaf area index, dry matter production and nutrient uptake.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
60 x 20 cme2
Outcome
leaf area index, dry matter production and nutrient uptakee0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“with the highest leaf area index, dry matter production and nutrient uptake of sweet corn.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 739–829 · show in text ↑
e2

“planting pattern of 60 x 20 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–669 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 x 25 cm pattern significantly increased cob length, green cob weight and kernels per cob.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
60 x 25 cme0
Outcome
cob length, green cob weight (with husk) and number of kernels/cobe0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“cob length, green cob weight (with husk) and number of kernels/cob were significantly higher with 60 x 25 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1013 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 x 20 cm pattern gave the highest green cob yield in 2004 and 2005.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
60 x 20 cme0
Outcome
yield of green cobe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
13.9 and 13.1 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“60 x 20 cm resulted in the highest yield of green cob (13.9 and 13.1 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1155 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 x 20 cm pattern gave the highest green fodder yield in 2004 and 2005.

Taxon
sweet corne3
Treatment
60 x 20 cme2
Outcome
green foddere0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
17.6 and 16.7 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“green fodder (17.6 and 16.7 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1193 · show in text ↑
e2

“planting pattern of 60 x 20 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–669 · show in text ↑
e3

“performance of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 x 20 cm pattern enhanced monetary returns.

Taxon
sweet corne3
Treatment
60 x 20 cme2
Outcome
monetary returnse0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
3.43 and 3.23e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“enhanced monetary returns (benefit : cost ratio of 3.43 and 3.23)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1264 · show in text ↑
e2

“planting pattern of 60 x 20 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–669 · show in text ↑
e3

“performance of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three weed control practices suppressed weeds relative to the weedy check.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
three weed control practicese0
Outcome
weed growthe0
Direction
suppressinge0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Verbatim

e0

“All the three weed control practices were more or less equally effective in suppressing the weed growth and were superior to weedy check.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1438 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine plus hand weeding produced lower weed count, dry weight and nutrient uptake.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
pre-emergence application of atrazine @ 1 kg/ha+HW at 30 DASe0
Outcome
weed count, dry weight and nutrient uptake of weedse0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“pre-emergence application of atrazine @ 1 kg/ha+HW at 30 DAS recorded distinctly lower weed count, dry weight and nutrient uptake of weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1616 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine plus hand weeding improved crop growth stature and yield attributes.

Taxon
sweet corne3
Treatment
atrazine @ 1 kg/ha+HW at 30 DASe2
Outcome
crop growth stature, yield attributese0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“improved the crop growth stature, yield attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1668 · show in text ↑
e2

“pre-emergence application of atrazine @ 1 kg/ha+HW at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1538 · show in text ↑
e3

“performance of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine plus hand weeding gave the highest green cob yield.

Taxon
sweet corne3
Treatment
atrazine @ 1 kg/ha+HW at 30 DASe2
Outcome
green cobe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
14.2 and 13.4 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“highest green cob (14.2 and 13.4 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1694–1732 · show in text ↑
e2

“pre-emergence application of atrazine @ 1 kg/ha+HW at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1538 · show in text ↑
e3

“performance of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atrazine plus hand weeding gave the highest fodder yield.

Taxon
sweet corne3
Treatment
atrazine @ 1 kg/ha+HW at 30 DASe2
Outcome
fodder yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
18.0 and 17.1 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fodder yield (18.0 and 17.1 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1770 · show in text ↑
e2

“pre-emergence application of atrazine @ 1 kg/ha+HW at 30 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1538 · show in text ↑
e3

“performance of sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–615 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed nitrogen uptake was 42.3% lower in 2004-05 and 47.4% lower in 2005-06 with atrazine plus hand weeding.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
pre-emergence of atrazine+HW at 30 DASe1
Outcome
uptake of nitrogene0
Direction
lessere0
Value
42.3e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Verbatim

e0

“42.3, 54.0 and 46.2% lesser uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, respectively, over weedy check during 2004-05, whereas it was lesser to the extent of 47.4, 65.4 and 44.2% during 2005-06.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2030–2226 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“Weeds in the best treatment as pre-emergence of atrazine+HW at 30 DAS recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed phosphorus uptake was reduced by 54.0% and 65.4% in the two seasons.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
pre-emergence of atrazine+HW at 30 DASe1
Outcome
phosphoruse0
Direction
lessere0
Value
54.0e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Verbatim

e0

“42.3, 54.0 and 46.2% lesser uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, respectively, over weedy check during 2004-05, whereas it was lesser to the extent of 47.4, 65.4 and 44.2% during 2005-06.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2030–2226 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“Weeds in the best treatment as pre-emergence of atrazine+HW at 30 DAS recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed potassium uptake was reduced by 46.2% and 44.2% in the two seasons.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
pre-emergence of atrazine+HW at 30 DASe1
Outcome
potassiume0
Direction
lessere0
Value
46.2%e0
Comparator
weedy checke0

Verbatim

e0

“42.3, 54.0 and 46.2% lesser uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium, respectively, over weedy check during 2004-05, whereas it was lesser to the extent of 47.4, 65.4 and 44.2% during 2005-06.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2030–2226 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–118 · show in text ↑
e1

“Weeds in the best treatment as pre-emergence of atrazine+HW at 30 DAS recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2029 · show in text ↑

atrazine · weed · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

202 papers: 197 positive, 5 negative or no effect

196 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

atrazine · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

240 papers: 205 positive, 35 negative or no effect

204 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

236 papers more in this group

See all 240 papers →

herbicide · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

herbicide · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

406 papers: 360 positive, 46 negative or no effect

359 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

402 papers more in this group

See all 406 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.