Paper · 2016 · Journals & Books Hosting (International Knowledge Sharing Platform)

Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Nitrogen Fertilizer Rates and Intra Row Spacing on Growth and Bulb Yield of Onion (Allium cepa L.) under Rainfall Condition

Kiros Gebretsadik

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Shire, Lemlem demonstration farm under rainfall condition to study the impact of nitrogen (N) fertilizer rates and intra row spacing on growth bulb yields and profitability of onion (Allium cepa L.).Treatments consisted of factorial combination of four rates of N fertilizer (0, 50, 100 and 150 kg ha -1 ) and four intra row spacing (4, 6, 8, and 10 cm).The experiment was laid out as a Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications.The result of this study revealed that the interaction effect of N and spacing affected days to maturity and plant height.The main effect of N significantly affected most of the studied parameters while spacing affected number of leaves and yield.Days to maturity of onions were prolonged in response to the increased rate of nitrogen application.Increasing nitrogen from the nil to 150 kg N ha -1 decreased bolting percentage by 62%.Increasing the rate of nitrogen from 50 to 100 kg N ha -1 increased the total bulb yield and leaf number by about 26.7% and 29% respectively.However, increasing the rate of N further from 100 to 150 kg N ha -1 tended to decrease total bulb yield by 5.3 %.Higher marketable yield of 31.455t ha -1 were obtained at 100 kg N ha .-1 .The result of partial Budget analysis showed that 100 kg N ha -1 combined with 6 cm intra row spacing was found the best treatment than others in relation to bulb yield and economic benefits under the condition of Shire, northern Ethiopia.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate and spacing interacted in their effects on days to maturity.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
N and spacinge1
Outcome
days to maturitye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“the interaction effect of N and spacing affected days to maturity and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate and spacing interacted in their effects on plant height.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
N and spacinge1
Outcome
plant heighte1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“the interaction effect of N and spacing affected days to maturity and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–601 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The main nitrogen effect significantly affected most studied parameters.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
Ne1
Outcome
most of the studied parameterse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“The main effect of N significantly affected most of the studied parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–676 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing affected onion leaf number.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
spacinge1
Outcome
number of leavese1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“spacing affected number of leaves and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing affected onion yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
spacinge1
Outcome
yielde1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“spacing affected number of leaves and yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–726 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen rate prolonged onion days to maturity.

Taxon
onionsAllium cepae0
Treatment
increased rate of nitrogen applicatione0
Outcome
Days to maturitye0
Direction
prolongede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Days to maturity of onions were prolonged in response to the increased rate of nitrogen application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen from nil to 150 kg N ha -1 decreased bolting by 62%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
150 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
bolting percentagee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
62%e1
Comparator
nile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing nitrogen from the nil to 150 kg N ha -1 decreased bolting percentage by 62%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–913 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen from 50 to 100 kg N ha -1 increased total bulb yield by about 26.7%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
total bulb yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
26.7%e1
Comparator
50e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing the rate of nitrogen from 50 to 100 kg N ha -1 increased the total bulb yield and leaf number by about 26.7% and 29% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen from 50 to 100 kg N ha -1 increased leaf number by about 29%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
leaf numbere1
Direction
increasede1
Value
29%e1
Comparator
50e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“Increasing the rate of nitrogen from 50 to 100 kg N ha -1 increased the total bulb yield and leaf number by about 26.7% and 29% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 914–1054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen from 100 to 150 kg N ha -1 tended to decrease total bulb yield by 5.3%.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
150 kg N ha -1e1
Outcome
total bulb yielde1
Direction
decreasee1
Value
5.3 %e1
Qualifier
tended toe1
Comparator
100e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“increasing the rate of N further from 100 to 150 kg N ha -1 tended to decrease total bulb yield by 5.3 %”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1168 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher marketable yield at 100 kg N ha .-1 was 31.455t ha -1.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100 kg N ha .-1e1
Outcome
marketable yielde1
Direction
Highere1
Value
31.455t ha -1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“Higher marketable yield of 31.455t ha -1 were obtained at 100 kg N ha .-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1242 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The budget analysis identified 100 kg N ha -1 with 6 cm spacing as the best treatment for bulb yield and economic benefit under Shire conditions.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae0
Treatment
100 kg N ha -1 combined with 6 cm intra row spacinge1
Outcome
best treatment than others in relation to bulb yield and economic benefitse1
Setting
Shire, northern Ethiopiae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–234 · show in text ↑
e1

“100 kg N ha -1 combined with 6 cm intra row spacing was found the best treatment than others in relation to bulb yield and economic benefits under the condition of Shire, northern Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1294–1482 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

81 papers: 71 positive, 10 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

nitrogen · phenology · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 8 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 157 positive, 27 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.