Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Protection Research

Evaluation of some microbial agents, natural and chemical compounds for controlling tomato leaf miner, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae)

Nesreen M. Abd El-Ghany; Atef Sayed Abdel-Razek; Ibrahim M.A. Ebadah; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
31
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Solanaceous plants have a great economic impact in Egypt. These groups of plants include potatoes, tomatoes and eggplants. The new invasive pest of tomatoes, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) causes the greatest crop losses which can range from 60 to 100%. After its detection in Egypt during the last half of 2009, it spread quickly to all provinces in the country. We aiming to propose a sustainable control program for this devastating pest. In this research we tested three groups of control agents. The first was microbial and natural, the second - plant extracts and the third - chemical insecticides. Our results showed that the impact of T. absoluta can be greatly reduced by the use of sustainable control measures represented by different insecticide groups. Bioassay experiments showed that this devastating pest can be controlled with some compounds that give high mortality rates. Of these compounds, spinosad and Beauveria bassiana, microbial control agents, followed by azadirachtin, gave the best results in controlling T. absoluta. Of the chemical insecticides, lambda-cyhalotrin was the most effective, followed by lufenuron and profenofos. In conclusion we encourage farmers to use microbial and natural control measures in combating the tomato leafminer, T. absoluta, in Integrated Pest Mangement (IPM) programs.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sustainable control measures greatly reduced the impact of Tuta absoluta on tomato.

Treatment
sustainable control measurese7
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae3pest
Outcome
impact of T. absolutae7
Direction
greatly reducede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The new invasive pest of tomatoes, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–190 · show in text ↑
e7

“the impact of T. absoluta can be greatly reduced by the use of sustainable control measures”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some compounds gave high mortality of Tuta absoluta in bioassays on tomato.

Treatment
some compoundse4
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae3pest
Outcome
mortality ratese4
Direction
highe4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The new invasive pest of tomatoes, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–190 · show in text ↑
e4

“this devastating pest can be controlled with some compounds that give high mortality rates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinosad gave the best results in controlling Tuta absoluta.

Treatment
spinosade5
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae5pest
Outcome
controlling T. absolutae5
Direction
gave the best resultse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The new invasive pest of tomatoes, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–190 · show in text ↑
e5

“spinosad and Beauveria bassiana, microbial control agents, followed by azadirachtin, gave the best results in controlling T. absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Beauveria bassiana gave the best results in controlling Tuta absoluta.

Treatment
Beauveria bassianae5
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae5pest
Second interactor
Beauveria bassianaBeauveria bassianae5biocontrol_agent
Outcome
controlling T. absolutae5
Direction
gave the best resultse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Beauveria bassiana
Beauveria bassiana · Second interactorBealeiderman · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The new invasive pest of tomatoes, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–190 · show in text ↑
e5

“spinosad and Beauveria bassiana, microbial control agents, followed by azadirachtin, gave the best results in controlling T. absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azadirachtin followed the best microbial agents in controlling Tuta absoluta.

Treatment
azadirachtine5
Interactor
T. absolutaTuta absolutae5pest
Outcome
controlling T. absolutae5
Direction
followed bye5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The new invasive pest of tomatoes, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–190 · show in text ↑
e5

“spinosad and Beauveria bassiana, microbial control agents, followed by azadirachtin, gave the best results in controlling T. absoluta”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–1046 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lambda-cyhalotrin was the most effective chemical insecticide against Tuta absoluta on tomato.

Treatment
lambda-cyhalotrine6
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae3pest
Outcome
the most effectivee6
Direction
the most effectivee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The new invasive pest of tomatoes, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–190 · show in text ↑
e6

“lambda-cyhalotrin was the most effective, followed by lufenuron and profenofos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lufenuron was the next most effective chemical insecticide after lambda-cyhalotrin against Tuta absoluta.

Treatment
lufenurone6
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae3pest
Outcome
effectivee6
Direction
followed bye6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The new invasive pest of tomatoes, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–190 · show in text ↑
e6

“lambda-cyhalotrin was the most effective, followed by lufenuron and profenofos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profenofos was the next most effective chemical insecticide after lambda-cyhalotrin against Tuta absoluta.

Treatment
profenofose6
Interactor
Tuta absolutaTuta absolutae3pest
Outcome
effectivee6
Direction
followed bye6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tuta absoluta
Tuta absoluta · InteractorPatrick Clement from West Midlands, England · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The new invasive pest of tomatoes, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 132–190 · show in text ↑
e6

“lambda-cyhalotrin was the most effective, followed by lufenuron and profenofos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1156 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend microbial and natural control measures against the tomato leafminer in IPM programs.

Interactor
tomato leafminerLiriomyza bryoniaee0pest
Outcome
use microbial and natural control measurese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Liriomyza bryoniae
Liriomyza bryoniae · InteractorAfroBrazilian · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“we encourage farmers to use microbial and natural control measures in combating the tomato leafminer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1272 · show in text ↑

lufenuron · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

azadirachtin · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Beauveria bassiana · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

spinosad · Tuta absoluta · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.