Paper · 2016 · African Journal of Agricultural Research

Influences of inter and intra row spacing on yield, yield component and morphological characteristics of onion (Allium cepa L.) at Western Amhara region

Tegen Habtamu; Jembere Minuyelet; Mihiretu Esmelealem; et al.

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Appropriate spacing enables the farmers to keep appropriate plant population in the field. Hence, it can avoid over or less population in a given plot of land which has negative effect on yield and quality of onion. Spacing of 40 × 20 × 10 cm between furrow, row and plants, respectively has been used for onion production in Ethiopia. But producers complain 10 cm intra row spacing produces large bulb size which is not preferred by consumer for home consumption. To optimize onion productivity, full package of information is required. To fill this gap field experiment was conducted to study the effect of inter and intra row spacing on the bulb yield and yield components of onion at Ribb in Fogera, Woramit in Bahir Dar and Koga in Mecha districts in 2014. The interaction of the lowest inter and intra row spacing mature earlier by 15 days compared to highest inter and intra row spacing. Forty nine percent of medium sized bulbs were produced with the interaction of 15 and 6 cm inter and intra row spacing while only 32% of medium sized bulbs were produced by the interaction of 25 and 8 cm inter and intra row spacing. Small sized bulb distribution decreased as intra row spacing increased while large bulb sized distribution increased when intra row spacing increased. The highest bulb weight (102 g) was produced by the interaction of highest inter and intra row spacing while the lowest bulb weight (45 g) was produced by the lowest inter and intra row spacing. Interaction of inter and intra row spacing of 15 and 4 cm respectively, scored the 1st highest marketable bulb yield (39 ton ha-1) and interaction of 15 and 6 cm inter and intra row spacing scored the 2st highest marketable bulb yield (36 ton ha-1). The result revealed that the earlier recommendation (20 and 10 cm inter and intra row spacing) produced more number of medium and large sized bulbs with a yield penalty of 8.0 and 10 ton per ha-1 compared to interaction of inter row spacing of 15 cm with intra row spacing of 6 and 4 cm, respectively. Therefore, the interaction of inter and intra row spacing of 15 with 6 cm is recommended as a first option for producers who wishes to produce maximum bulb yield with maximum medium sized bulbs. It is also confirmed that earlier recommendation is better as a second option for producers who wishes to produce for export market which requires medium and large sized bulbs of onion. Key words: Onion, inter, intra, spacing, bulb, yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The closest inter and intra row spacing matured 15 days earlier than the widest spacing.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
lowest inter and intra row spacinge0
Outcome
maturee0
Direction
earliere0
Value
15 dayse0
Comparator
highest inter and intra row spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“The interaction of the lowest inter and intra row spacing mature earlier by 15 days compared to highest inter and intra row spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 762–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15 and 6 cm spacing produced 49% medium bulbs versus 32% with 25 and 8 cm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
15 and 6 cm inter and intra row spacinge0
Outcome
medium sized bulbse0
Direction
Forty nine percente0
Qualifier
only 32%e0
Comparator
25 and 8 cm inter and intra row spacinge0

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Forty nine percent of medium sized bulbs were produced with the interaction of 15 and 6 cm inter and intra row spacing while only 32% of medium sized bulbs were produced by the interaction of 25 and 8 cm inter and intra row spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1127 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small bulb frequency decreased as intra row spacing increased.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
intra row spacinge0
Outcome
Small sized bulb distributione0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Small sized bulb distribution decreased as intra row spacing increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1128–1198 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Large bulb frequency increased as intra row spacing increased.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
intra row spacinge0
Outcome
large bulb sized distributione0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“large bulb sized distribution increased when intra row spacing increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1277 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The widest spacing produced the highest bulb weight of 102 g, versus 45 g at the closest spacing.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
highest inter and intra row spacinge0
Outcome
bulb weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
102 ge0
Qualifier
45 ge0
Comparator
lowest inter and intra row spacinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“The highest bulb weight (102 g) was produced by the interaction of highest inter and intra row spacing while the lowest bulb weight (45 g) was produced by the lowest inter and intra row spacing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1473 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15 and 4 cm spacing gave the top marketable bulb yield, 39 ton ha-1.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
15 and 4 cme0
Outcome
marketable bulb yielde0
Direction
1st higheste0
Value
39 ton ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“Interaction of inter and intra row spacing of 15 and 4 cm respectively, scored the 1st highest marketable bulb yield (39 ton ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1474–1604 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 15 and 6 cm spacing gave the second marketable yield, 36 ton ha-1.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
15 and 6 cm inter and intra row spacinge0
Outcome
marketable bulb yielde0
Direction
2st higheste0
Value
36 ton ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“interaction of 15 and 6 cm inter and intra row spacing scored the 2st highest marketable bulb yield (36 ton ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1722 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The earlier 20 and 10 cm recommendation yielded 8.0 ton per ha-1 less than 15 and 6 cm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Treatment
20 and 10 cm inter and intra row spacinge0
Outcome
yield penaltye0
Direction
penaltye0
Value
8.0e0
Comparator
15 cm with intra row spacing of 6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“the earlier recommendation (20 and 10 cm inter and intra row spacing) produced more number of medium and large sized bulbs with a yield penalty of 8.0 and 10 ton per ha-1 compared to interaction of inter row spacing of 15 cm with intra row spacing of 6 and 4 cm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–2024 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The earlier spacing recommendation yielded 10 ton per ha-1 less than 15 and 4 cm.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
yield penaltye0
Direction
penaltye0
Value
10 ton per ha-1e0
Comparator
15 cm with intra row spacing of 6 and 4 cme0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“a yield penalty of 8.0 and 10 ton per ha-1 compared to interaction of inter row spacing of 15 cm with intra row spacing of 6 and 4 cm, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1877–2024 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 15 and 6 cm spacing for maximum yield and medium bulb production.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
15 with 6 cm is recommended as a first optione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“the interaction of inter and intra row spacing of 15 with 6 cm is recommended as a first option for producers who wishes to produce maximum bulb yield with maximum medium sized bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2037–2219 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The earlier recommendation is a second option for export markets requiring medium and large bulbs.

Taxon
onionAllium cepat0
Outcome
earlier recommendation is better as a second optione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“onion (Allium cepa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 105–127 · show in text ↑
e0

“earlier recommendation is better as a second option for producers who wishes to produce for export market which requires medium and large sized bulbs of onion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2247–2405 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 48 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 48 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.