Abstract
In order to arrest vegetative growth of grape shoots, various growth regulating substances were applicated on five grapeVine cultivars: Alphonse Lavallee, Muscat of Hamburg, Cardinal, Perlette, and Queen of the Vineyards. Ethephon at a concentration of 480 ppm efficiently inhibited the terminal growth of the canes and prevented the opening of lateral buds on the shoots for about 8 to 10 weeks. This treatment somewhat enhanced maturation of the current yield. No negative effect on bud differentiation, bud opening and growth in the following season was found. The use of Ethephon was much more effective than the other regulators tested such as Alar, NC 9634, pp 413, and morphactin 7311. Alar caused a shortening of the canes, not effecting the number of nodes. pp 413 had no activity in our system while both the morphactin and NC 9634 did inhibit growth partially. The Ethephon treatment was far more efficient and uniform than repeated manual topping. Regulierung des vegetativen Wachstums von Reben (Vitis vinifera) durch Etephon und andere Hemmstoffe Die hemmende Wirkung verschiedener Wachstumsregulatoren wurde an fünf Rebsorten geprüft: Alphonse Lavallee, Muskat Hamburg, Cardinal, Perlette und Queen of the Vineyards. Etephon hemmte bei einer Konzentration von 480 ppm deutlich das Spitzenwachstum der Triebe und verzögerte den Austrieb der lateralen Knospen um 8 bis 10 Wochen. Diese Behandlung erhöhte den Reifegrad der Traubenernte. Ein negativer Einfluß auf Knospendifferenzierung, Knospenaustrieb und Wachstum in der folgenden Wachstumsperiode wurde nicht gefunden. Etephon war erheblich wirksamer als die anderen verwendeten Substanzen: Alar, NC 9634, PP 413 und Morphaktin 7311. Alar verursachte eine- Verkürzung der Triebe, ohne die Zahl der Nodi zu verändern. pp 413 hatte keine Wirkung, während Morphaktin und NC 9634 das Wachstum teilweise hemmten. Etephon wirkte weitaus nachhaltiger und gleichförmiger als wiederholtes Gipfeln in Handarbeit.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon at 480 ppm inhibited terminal growth of grapevine canes.
- Taxon
- Vitis vinifera
Vitis viniferat0 - Treatment
- Ethephon at a concentration of 480 ppme1
- Outcome
- terminal growth of the canese1
- Direction
- inhibitede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“grape vines (Vitis vinifera)”
e1“Ethephon at a concentration of 480 ppm efficiently inhibited the terminal growth of the canes and prevented the opening of lateral buds on the shoots for about 8 to 10 weeks”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon at 480 ppm prevented opening of lateral buds for about 8 to 10 weeks.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- Ethephon at a concentration of 480 ppme1
- Outcome
- opening of lateral budse1
- Direction
- preventede1
- Value
- 8 to 10 weekse1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“grape vines (Vitis vinifera)”
e1“Ethephon at a concentration of 480 ppm efficiently inhibited the terminal growth of the canes and prevented the opening of lateral buds on the shoots for about 8 to 10 weeks”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon somewhat enhanced maturation of the current yield.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- Ethephon at a concentration of 480 ppme1
- Outcome
- maturation of the current yielde2
- Direction
- enhancede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“grape vines (Vitis vinifera)”
e1“Ethephon at a concentration of 480 ppm efficiently inhibited the terminal growth of the canes and prevented the opening of lateral buds on the shoots for about 8 to 10 weeks”
e2“This treatment somewhat enhanced maturation of the current yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon had no negative effect on bud differentiation, bud opening or growth in the following season.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- Ethephon at a concentration of 480 ppme1
- Outcome
- bud differentiation, bud opening and growth in the following seasone3
- Direction
- no_changeinferrede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“grape vines (Vitis vinifera)”
e1“Ethephon at a concentration of 480 ppm efficiently inhibited the terminal growth of the canes and prevented the opening of lateral buds on the shoots for about 8 to 10 weeks”
e3“No negative effect on bud differentiation, bud opening and growth in the following season was found”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon was much more effective than Alar, NC 9634, pp 413 and morphactin 7311 in controlling grapevine growth.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- Ethephone4
- Outcome
- effectivee4
- Direction
- much more effectivee4
- Comparator
- Alar, NC 9634, pp 413, and morphactin 7311e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“grape vines (Vitis vinifera)”
e4“The use of Ethephon was much more effective than the other regulators tested such as Alar, NC 9634, pp 413, and morphactin 7311”
Claim · model-written summary
Alar shortened the canes without changing the number of nodes.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- Alare5
- Outcome
- shortening of the canese5
- Direction
- shorteninge5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“grape vines (Vitis vinifera)”
e5“Alar caused a shortening of the canes, not effecting the number of nodes”
Claim · model-written summary
pp 413 had no activity on grapevine growth in the study.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- pp 413e6
- Outcome
- activitye6
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“grape vines (Vitis vinifera)”
e6“pp 413 had no activity in our system while both the morphactin and NC 9634 did inhibit growth partially”
Claim · model-written summary
Morphactin and NC 9634 partially inhibited grapevine shoot growth.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- morphactin and NC 9634e6
- Outcome
- growthe6
- Direction
- inhibite6
- Qualifier
- partiallye6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“grape vines (Vitis vinifera)”
e6“pp 413 had no activity in our system while both the morphactin and NC 9634 did inhibit growth partially”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethephon was far more efficient and uniform than repeated manual topping.
- Taxon
- Vitis viniferaVitis viniferat0
- Treatment
- The Ethephon treatmente7
- Outcome
- efficient and uniforme7
- Direction
- far more efficiente7
- Comparator
- repeated manual toppinge7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“grape vines (Vitis vinifera)”
e7“The Ethephon treatment was far more efficient and uniform than repeated manual topping”
The same questions in other papers
(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.