Paper · 2011

Pre-harvest ethephon (2-chloroethyl phosphonic acid) on berry quality of 'Beidaneh Ghermez' grape

Mohammad E. Amiri; Shahla Parseh

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pre-harvest ethephon (2-chloroethyl phosphonic acid) sprays at four levels (0, 100, 200 and 300 ppm), at 20% to 30% veraison enhanced berry maturation and other quality of (Vitis vinifera cv. Beidaneh Ghermez). ‘Beidaneh Ghermez’ is one of the most popular red seedless table grapes in the Middle East, but is usually has poor berry color. Ethephon application did not significantly affect the yield as compared to non-treated control, but fruit maturation (color) and berry size significantly (P = 0.05) increased as the rate of ethephon increased. Total berry skin anthocyanins significantly (P = 0.05) increased with every incremental increase in ethephon rate. The treatments did not significantly affect soluble solids concentrations (SSC), titratable acidity (TA) or juice pH. The highest SSC and TA were recorded in the control. The relationships between anthocynins and berry skin-color was linear. The grape berries receiving ethephon were less firm, but they had better berry quality (appearance) than those with no treatment (control).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon did not significantly affect grape yield versus untreated control.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Beidaneh Ghermeze1
Treatment
Ethephon applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Comparator
non-treated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ethephon application did not significantly affect the yield as compared to non-treated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–434 · show in text ↑
e1

“(Vitis vinifera cv. Beidaneh Ghermez)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grape berry color increased significantly as ethephon rate increased.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Beidaneh Ghermeze1
Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
fruit maturation (color)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit maturation (color) and berry size significantly (P = 0.05) increased as the rate of ethephon increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–549 · show in text ↑
e1

“(Vitis vinifera cv. Beidaneh Ghermez)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry size increased significantly as ethephon rate increased.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Beidaneh Ghermeze1
Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
berry sizee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit maturation (color) and berry size significantly (P = 0.05) increased as the rate of ethephon increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–549 · show in text ↑
e1

“(Vitis vinifera cv. Beidaneh Ghermez)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry skin anthocyanins increased significantly at each higher ethephon rate.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Beidaneh Ghermeze1
Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
Total berry skin anthocyaninse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Total berry skin anthocyanins significantly (P = 0.05) increased with every incremental increase in ethephon rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 550–664 · show in text ↑
e1

“(Vitis vinifera cv. Beidaneh Ghermez)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments did not significantly affect soluble solids, acidity, or juice pH.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Beidaneh Ghermeze1
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
soluble solids concentrations (SSC), titratable acidity (TA) or juice pHe0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatments did not significantly affect soluble solids concentrations (SSC), titratable acidity (TA) or juice pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–782 · show in text ↑
e1

“(Vitis vinifera cv. Beidaneh Ghermez)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–209 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control berries had the highest soluble solids and titratable acidity.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Beidaneh Ghermeze1
Outcome
highest SSC and TAe0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest SSC and TA were recorded in the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–835 · show in text ↑
e1

“(Vitis vinifera cv. Beidaneh Ghermez)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–209 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Berry skin color and anthocyanins had a linear relationship.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Beidaneh Ghermeze1
Compound
anthocyninse0
Outcome
berry skin-colore0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The relationships between anthocynins and berry skin-color was linear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–906 · show in text ↑
e1

“(Vitis vinifera cv. Beidaneh Ghermez)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon-treated berries were less firm than untreated berries.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Beidaneh Ghermeze1
Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
firme0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
no treatment (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grape berries receiving ethephon were less firm, but they had better berry quality (appearance) than those with no treatment (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1046 · show in text ↑
e1

“(Vitis vinifera cv. Beidaneh Ghermez)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–209 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon-treated berries had better appearance than untreated berries.

Taxon
Vitis viniferaVitis viniferae1
Material
Beidaneh Ghermeze1
Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
berry quality (appearance)e0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
no treatment (control)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grape berries receiving ethephon were less firm, but they had better berry quality (appearance) than those with no treatment (control).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 907–1046 · show in text ↑
e1

“(Vitis vinifera cv. Beidaneh Ghermez)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 172–209 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: phytochemicals · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: postharvest · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.