Abstract
The effect of passive modified atmosphere packaging on some postharvest qualities of stored fresh maize was investigated at tropical ambient temperature (282 C) and 80% RH. Changes in the appearances of husk, silk and kernel, kernel firmness, weight and microbial growth were monitored. Freshly harvested yellow maize (FHYM) served as control. Results showed that packaging film greatly affected the appearances of the husk, silk, kernel and kernel firmness compare to the control sample. The highest weight loss was observed in dehusked maize while the maize samples in packaging film had the least weight loss. Lactobacillus sp., Micrococcus liteus, Streptococcus sp., Serratia marcescens, Bacillus sp. and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were the bacteria isolated from the stored fresh maize while the suspected fungal include Rhizopus stolonifer, Penicillium notatum and Fusarium sp. Higher bacteria counts were observed in samples packaged with 25 and 30 m LDPE while the least was found in unpackaged undehusked maize. The current packaging conditions had no impact on the shelf life of fresh maize.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Packaging film affected the appearances of husk, silk and kernel compared with the control.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Maize (Zea Mays L.)”
e0“packaging film greatly affected the appearances of the husk, silk, kernel and kernel firmness compare to the control sample”
Claim · model-written summary
Packaging film affected kernel firmness compared with the control.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Maize (Zea Mays L.)”
e0“packaging film greatly affected the appearances of the husk, silk, kernel and kernel firmness compare to the control sample”
Claim · model-written summary
Dehusked maize had the highest weight loss.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The highest weight loss was observed in dehusked maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize in packaging film had the least weight loss.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the maize samples in packaging film had the least weight loss”
Claim · model-written summary
Several bacterial taxa were isolated from stored fresh maize.
- Outcome
- Lactobacillus sp., Micrococcus liteus, Streptococcus sp., Serratia marcescens, Bacillus sp. and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were the bacteria isolatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Lactobacillus sp., Micrococcus liteus, Streptococcus sp., Serratia marcescens, Bacillus sp. and Saccharomyces cerevisiae were the bacteria isolated from the stored fresh maize”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizopus stolonifer, Penicillium notatum and Fusarium sp. were suspected fungi in stored maize.
- Outcome
- suspected fungal include Rhizopus stolonifer, Penicillium notatum and Fusarium sp.e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Maize (Zea Mays L.)”
e0“the suspected fungal include Rhizopus stolonifer, Penicillium notatum and Fusarium sp.”
Claim · model-written summary
Samples packaged with 25 and 30 m LDPE had higher bacterial counts.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“Maize (Zea Mays L.)”
e0“Higher bacteria counts were observed in samples packaged with 25 and 30 m LDPE”
Claim · model-written summary
Unpackaged undehusked maize had the least bacterial counts.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the least was found in unpackaged undehusked maize”
e1“Higher bacteria counts were observed in samples packaged with 25 and 30 m LDPE while the least was found in unpackaged undehusked maize”
Claim · model-written summary
The current packaging conditions had no impact on fresh maize shelf life.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The current packaging conditions had no impact on the shelf life of fresh maize.”
The same questions in other papers
storage · quality: postharvest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.