Paper · 2014 · Greener Journal of Agronomy Forestry and Horticulture

Impact of Phosphorous Levels and Different Tillage Systems on Yield and Economics of Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)

Waseem Riaz Marral Muhammad; Shahid Ibni Zamir Muhammad; Iqbal Shahid

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Proper application of phosphorous (P) dose and selection of an adequate tillage system could be effective in increasing the yield of crops. Therefore, a field experiment was conducted atAgronomic Research Area, University of Agriculture Faisalabad, Pakistan during summer, 2009, using different levels of phosphorous and tillage systems. There were three tillage systems (zero tillage, minimum tillage and conventional tillage) and three phosphorus levels (30, 60 and 90 kg P ha-1). Treatments were arranged in randomized complete block design (RCBD) with split plot arrangement. Results revealed that pods bearing branches per plant, seeds per plant and seed yield were significantly affected by various levels of applied phosphorous and tillage systems. Among different phosphorous levels, 90 kg P ha-1 produced maximum pods bearing branches per plant (4.52), seeds per plant (78.26) and seed yield (1064 kg ha-1). While, among different tillage systems, conventional tillage gave relatively better pods bearing branches per plant (4.8), seeds per plant (81.81) and seed yield (1142.3 kg ha-1) than others. However in case of interaction, the conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1 performed better and gave the maximum pods bearing branches per plant (4.9), seeds per plant (94.71), straw yield (4090 kg ha-1) and seed yield (1243 kg ha-1) as compared to others. Conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1 also gave higher gross income (1945 USD ha-1), net income (1568 USD ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (5.16). It was concluded from this study that conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1 could be successfully utilized on economic basis in order to get better seed yield in agro-climatic conditions of Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus level and tillage significantly affected pod-bearing branches, seeds per plant and seed yield.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
various levels of applied phosphorous and tillage systemse0
Outcome
pods bearing branches per plant, seeds per plant and seed yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pods bearing branches per plant, seeds per plant and seed yield were significantly affected by various levels of applied phosphorous and tillage systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90 kg P ha-1, pod-bearing branches per plant reached a maximum of 4.52.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
90 kg P ha-1e0
Outcome
pods bearing branches per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.52e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“90 kg P ha-1 produced maximum pods bearing branches per plant (4.52), seeds per plant (78.26) and seed yield (1064 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90 kg P ha-1, seeds per plant reached a maximum of 78.26.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
90 kg P ha-1e0
Outcome
seeds per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
78.26e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“90 kg P ha-1 produced maximum pods bearing branches per plant (4.52), seeds per plant (78.26) and seed yield (1064 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 90 kg P ha-1, seed yield reached a maximum of 1064 kg ha-1.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
90 kg P ha-1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1064 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“90 kg P ha-1 produced maximum pods bearing branches per plant (4.52), seeds per plant (78.26) and seed yield (1064 kg ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage produced relatively better pod-bearing branches per plant, 4.8.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
pods bearing branches per plante0
Direction
relatively bettere0
Value
4.8e0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage gave relatively better pods bearing branches per plant (4.8), seeds per plant (81.81) and seed yield (1142.3 kg ha-1) than others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage produced relatively better seeds per plant, 81.81.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
seeds per plante0
Direction
relatively bettere0
Value
81.81e0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage gave relatively better pods bearing branches per plant (4.8), seeds per plant (81.81) and seed yield (1142.3 kg ha-1) than others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage produced relatively better seed yield, 1142.3 kg ha-1.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
relatively bettere0
Value
1142.3 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage gave relatively better pods bearing branches per plant (4.8), seeds per plant (81.81) and seed yield (1142.3 kg ha-1) than others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1107 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with 90 kg P ha-1 maximized pod-bearing branches per plant at 4.9.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1e0
Outcome
pods bearing branches per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.9e0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1 performed better and gave the maximum pods bearing branches per plant (4.9), seeds per plant (94.71), straw yield (4090 kg ha-1) and seed yield (1243 kg ha-1) as compared to others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with 90 kg P ha-1 maximized seeds per plant at 94.71.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1e0
Outcome
seeds per plante0
Direction
maximume0
Value
94.71e0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1 performed better and gave the maximum pods bearing branches per plant (4.9), seeds per plant (94.71), straw yield (4090 kg ha-1) and seed yield (1243 kg ha-1) as compared to others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with 90 kg P ha-1 maximized straw yield at 4090 kg ha-1.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4090 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1 performed better and gave the maximum pods bearing branches per plant (4.9), seeds per plant (94.71), straw yield (4090 kg ha-1) and seed yield (1243 kg ha-1) as compared to others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with 90 kg P ha-1 maximized seed yield at 1243 kg ha-1.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1e0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1243 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
otherse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1 performed better and gave the maximum pods bearing branches per plant (4.9), seeds per plant (94.71), straw yield (4090 kg ha-1) and seed yield (1243 kg ha-1) as compared to others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with 90 kg P ha-1 had higher gross income of 1945 USD ha-1.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1e0
Outcome
gross incomee0
Direction
highere0
Value
1945 USD ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1 also gave higher gross income (1945 USD ha-1), net income (1568 USD ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (5.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with 90 kg P ha-1 had higher net income of 1568 USD ha-1.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1e0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
highere0
Value
1568 USD ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1 also gave higher gross income (1945 USD ha-1), net income (1568 USD ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (5.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with 90 kg P ha-1 had a higher benefit cost ratio of 5.16.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1e0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.16e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1 also gave higher gross income (1945 USD ha-1), net income (1568 USD ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (5.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend conventional tillage with 90 kg P ha-1 for economic seed yield in Faisalabad.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Outcome
conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1 could be successfully utilized on economic basis in order to get better seed yielde0
Setting
Faisalabad, Pakistane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1 could be successfully utilized on economic basis in order to get better seed yield in agro-climatic conditions of Faisalabad, Pakistan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1542–1712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112 · show in text ↑

tillage · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 67 positive, 14 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.