Abstract
Soil puddling is considered favorable for rice but unfavorable for post-rice upland crops. The deleterious effects of puddling in post-rice mungbean and management of puddled soil have not been adequately addressed earlier in Bangladesh. This research work was conducted to amend differential puddled soil through organic amendments for improved post-rice mungbean production. The treatments were puddling by four passes, puddling by eight passes, and non-puddling with three organic amendments i.e. control, crop residue, and cow dung. Puddling generally increased bulk density of soil under moisture deficit condition. Puddling had no significant effect on soil pH, total-N, available-P, exchangeable-K, and organic-C. Application of cow dung in the puddle soil increased the amount of N (75.0%), P (35.5%), K (13.3%), and organic-C (38.8%) compared to control. Puddling (eight passes) impaired root growth resulting reduced total dry matter production by 15.6% over non-puddling condition. Cow dung management in differential puddling intensity gave higher root (0.13 g plant -1 ) and total dry matter (1.16 g plant -1 ) production of mungbean than without amendment at 60 days after seedling. Puddling intensity adversely affected the number of pods plant -1 , thousand-seed weight and seed yield. Cow dung application gave significantly higher number of pods, seeds pod -1 and thousand-seed weight. The mungbean seed yield achieved through cow dung incorporation (8.74 g plant -1 ) was better than crop residue (7.38 g plant -1 ) and control (7.34 g plant -1 ). The adverse effects of puddling intensity on soil strength and bulk density and succeeding plant growth and seed yield of mungbean were highly remarkable. Cow dung management indicated a positive response on the improvement of soil properties and mungbean seed yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Puddling increased soil bulk density under moisture deficit.
- Treatment
- Puddlinge0
- Outcome
- bulk density of soile0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- moisture deficit conditione0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
t0“mungbean”
e0“Puddling generally increased bulk density of soil under moisture deficit condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Puddling had no significant effect on soil pH, total-N and available-P.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
t0“mungbean”
e0“Puddling had no significant effect on soil pH, total-N, available-P, exchangeable-K, and organic-C”
Claim · model-written summary
Puddling had no significant effect on exchangeable-K or organic-C.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
t0“mungbean”
e0“Puddling had no significant effect on soil pH, total-N, available-P, exchangeable-K, and organic-C”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow dung increased soil N by 75.0% compared with control.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
t0“mungbean”
e0“Application of cow dung in the puddle soil increased the amount of N (75.0%), P (35.5%), K (13.3%), and organic-C (38.8%) compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow dung increased soil P by 35.5% compared with control.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
t0“mungbean”
e0“Application of cow dung in the puddle soil increased the amount of N (75.0%), P (35.5%), K (13.3%), and organic-C (38.8%) compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow dung increased soil K by 13.3% compared with control.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
t0“mungbean”
e0“Application of cow dung in the puddle soil increased the amount of N (75.0%), P (35.5%), K (13.3%), and organic-C (38.8%) compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow dung increased soil organic-C by 38.8% compared with control.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
t0“mungbean”
e0“Application of cow dung in the puddle soil increased the amount of N (75.0%), P (35.5%), K (13.3%), and organic-C (38.8%) compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
Eight puddling passes impaired mungbean root growth.
- Taxon
- mungbean
.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatat0 - Treatment
- Puddling (eight passes)e0
- Outcome
- root growthe0
- Direction
- impairede0
- Comparator
- non-puddling conditione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
t0“mungbean”
e0“Puddling (eight passes) impaired root growth resulting reduced total dry matter production by 15.6% over non-puddling condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Eight puddling passes reduced mungbean total dry matter production by 15.6% relative to non-puddling.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Puddling (eight passes)e0
- Outcome
- total dry matter productione0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 15.6%e0
- Comparator
- non-puddling conditione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mungbean”
e0“Puddling (eight passes) impaired root growth resulting reduced total dry matter production by 15.6% over non-puddling condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow dung under differential puddling gave higher mungbean root production than no amendment, reaching 0.13 g plant -1 at 60 days.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Cow dung managemente0
- Outcome
- roote0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 0.13 g plant -1e0
- Qualifier
- 60 days after seedlinge0
- Comparator
- without amendmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cow dung management in differential puddling intensity gave higher root (0.13 g plant -1 ) and total dry matter (1.16 g plant -1 ) production of mungbean than without amendment at 60 days after seedling”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow dung under differential puddling gave higher mungbean total dry matter production than no amendment, reaching 1.16 g plant -1.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- Cow dung managemente0
- Outcome
- total dry mattere0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.16 g plant -1e0
- Qualifier
- 60 days after seedlinge0
- Comparator
- without amendmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cow dung management in differential puddling intensity gave higher root (0.13 g plant -1 ) and total dry matter (1.16 g plant -1 ) production of mungbean than without amendment at 60 days after seedling”
Claim · model-written summary
Greater puddling intensity adversely affected mungbean pods per plant, thousand-seed weight and seed yield.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Puddling intensitye0
- Outcome
- number of pods plant -1 , thousand-seed weight and seed yielde0
- Direction
- adversely affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mungbean”
e0“Puddling intensity adversely affected the number of pods plant -1 , thousand-seed weight and seed yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow dung gave significantly higher pods per plant, seeds per pod and thousand-seed weight.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatat0
- Treatment
- Cow dung applicatione0
- Outcome
- number of pods, seeds pod -1 and thousand-seed weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mungbean”
e0“Cow dung application gave significantly higher number of pods, seeds pod -1 and thousand-seed weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow dung incorporation gave mungbean seed yield of 8.74 g plant -1, better than crop residue.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- cow dung incorporatione0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 8.74 g plant -1e0
- Qualifier
- 7.38 g plant -1e0
- Comparator
- crop residuee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mungbean”
e0“The mungbean seed yield achieved through cow dung incorporation (8.74 g plant -1 ) was better than crop residue (7.38 g plant -1 ) and control (7.34 g plant -1 )”
Claim · model-written summary
Cow dung incorporation gave mungbean seed yield of 8.74 g plant -1, better than control.
- Taxon
- mungbeanVigna radiatae0
- Treatment
- cow dung incorporatione0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Value
- 8.74 g plant -1e0
- Qualifier
- 7.34 g plant -1e0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“mungbean”
e0“The mungbean seed yield achieved through cow dung incorporation (8.74 g plant -1 ) was better than crop residue (7.38 g plant -1 ) and control (7.34 g plant -1 )”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →tillage · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.