Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional tillage with 90 kg P ha-1 had a higher benefit cost ratio of 5.16.

A claim from Impact of Phosphorous Levels and Different Tillage Systems on Yield and Economics of Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with 90 kg P ha-1 had a higher benefit cost ratio of 5.16.

Taxon
MungbeanVigna radiatat0
Treatment
Conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1e0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Value
5.16e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conventional tillage + 90 kg P ha-1 also gave higher gross income (1945 USD ha-1), net income (1568 USD ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (5.16)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1363–1502
t0

“Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–112

Title

Impact of Phosphorous Levels and Different Tillage Systems on Yield and Economics of Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.)

Waseem Riaz Marral Muhammad; Shahid Ibni Zamir Muhammad; Iqbal Shahid Greener Journal of Agronomy Forestry and Horticulture 2014. doi:10.15580/gjafh.2014.4.080114315

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-0dfc5f08af26cb4e190e4f044b670d90360b067be170ba81dc0695bbe453a559 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 14 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 67 positive, 14 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

72 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.