Paper · 2017 · Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science

Effectiveness of native Rhizobium on nodulation and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in Eastern Ethiopia

Anteneh Argaw; Abere Mnalku

12
claims
27
verbatim quotes
30
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study was initiated to evaluate the effect of locally isolated Rhizobium on nodulation and yield of faba bean at Haramaya, Ethiopia for three consecutive years. Ten treatments comprising of eight effective isolates of rhizobia, uninoculated, and N-fertilized (20 kg N ha−1) were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The result of the experiment indicated that all inoculation treatments increased nodule number and dry weight over the control check in all cropping seasons. The result, however, showed the non-significant effect of Rhizobium inoculation on shoot length, number of tiller per plant and 100 seed weight in all cropping season. Inoculating Haramaya University Faba Bean Rhizobium (HUFBR)-15 in 2011 and National Soil Faba Bean Rhizobium (NSFBR)-30 in 2012 and 2013 gave the highest grain yields (4330, 5267 and 4608 kg ha−1), respectively. These records were 75%, 48%, and 5% over the uninoculated treatment of respective years. Over the season, NSCBR-30 inoculation resulted in the highest nodulation and grain yield production as compared to the other treatments. In general, isolates from central Ethiopia were better than those isolated from eastern Ethiopia and Tropical Agricultural Legume (TAL)-1035 in enhancing faba bean production at Haramaya site. Therefore, NSFBR-30 is recommended as a candidate isolate for faba bean biofertilizer production in eastern Ethiopia soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All rhizobial inoculations increased faba bean nodule number over the control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
all inoculation treatmentse0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
nodule numbere0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all inoculation treatments increased nodule number and dry weight over the control check in all cropping seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All rhizobial inoculations increased faba bean nodule dry weight over the control.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
all inoculation treatmentse0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control checke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all inoculation treatments increased nodule number and dry weight over the control check in all cropping seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 400–512 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
e1

“Rhizobium inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–593 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium inoculation did not significantly affect shoot length, tiller number, or 100 seed weight.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Rhizobium inoculatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
shoot length, number of tiller per plant and 100 seed weighte0
Direction
non-significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non-significant effect of Rhizobium inoculation on shoot length, number of tiller per plant and 100 seed weight in all cropping season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

HUFBR-15 inoculation gave the highest grain yield in 2011, at 4330 kg ha−1.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Inoculating Haramaya University Faba Bean Rhizobium (HUFBR)-15e0
Interactor
Haramaya University Faba Bean Rhizobium (HUFBR)-15e0symbiont
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4330e0
Qualifier
in 2011e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculating Haramaya University Faba Bean Rhizobium (HUFBR)-15 in 2011 and National Soil Faba Bean Rhizobium (NSFBR)-30 in 2012 and 2013 gave the highest grain yields (4330, 5267 and 4608 kg ha−1), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSFBR-30 inoculation gave the highest grain yield in 2012, at 5267 kg ha−1.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
National Soil Faba Bean Rhizobium (NSFBR)-30e0
Interactor
National Soil Faba Bean Rhizobium (NSFBR)-30e0symbiont
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5267e0
Qualifier
in 2012e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculating Haramaya University Faba Bean Rhizobium (HUFBR)-15 in 2011 and National Soil Faba Bean Rhizobium (NSFBR)-30 in 2012 and 2013 gave the highest grain yields (4330, 5267 and 4608 kg ha−1), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NSFBR-30 inoculation gave the highest grain yield in 2013, at 4608 kg ha−1.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
National Soil Faba Bean Rhizobium (NSFBR)-30e0
Interactor
National Soil Faba Bean Rhizobium (NSFBR)-30e0symbiont
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4608e0
Qualifier
2013e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculating Haramaya University Faba Bean Rhizobium (HUFBR)-15 in 2011 and National Soil Faba Bean Rhizobium (NSFBR)-30 in 2012 and 2013 gave the highest grain yields (4330, 5267 and 4608 kg ha−1), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 682–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2011 highest yield was 75% over the uninoculated treatment.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
Haramaya University Faba Bean Rhizobium (HUFBR)-15e1
Outcome
recordse0
Direction
overe0
Value
75%e0
Comparator
uninoculated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These records were 75%, 48%, and 5% over the uninoculated treatment of respective years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–981 · show in text ↑
e1

“Haramaya University Faba Bean Rhizobium (HUFBR)-15 in 2011”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–752 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2012 highest yield was 48% over the uninoculated treatment.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
National Soil Faba Bean Rhizobium (NSFBR)-30e1
Outcome
recordse0
Direction
overe0
Value
48%e0
Comparator
uninoculated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These records were 75%, 48%, and 5% over the uninoculated treatment of respective years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–981 · show in text ↑
e1

“National Soil Faba Bean Rhizobium (NSFBR)-30 in 2012 and 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2013 highest yield was 5% over the uninoculated treatment.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
National Soil Faba Bean Rhizobium (NSFBR)-30e1
Outcome
recordse0
Direction
overe0
Value
5%e0
Comparator
uninoculated treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These records were 75%, 48%, and 5% over the uninoculated treatment of respective years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–981 · show in text ↑
e1

“National Soil Faba Bean Rhizobium (NSFBR)-30 in 2012 and 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 757–818 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Across seasons, NSCBR-30 produced the highest nodulation and grain yield relative to other treatments.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabat0
Treatment
NSCBR-30 inoculatione0
Interactor
NSCBR-30e0symbiont
Outcome
nodulation and grain yield productione0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over the season, NSCBR-30 inoculation resulted in the highest nodulation and grain yield production as compared to the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Central Ethiopian isolates enhanced faba bean production more than eastern Ethiopian isolates and TAL-1035.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
isolates from central Ethiopiae0
Interactor
isolates from central Ethiopiae0symbiont
Outcome
faba bean productione0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
those isolated from eastern Ethiopia and Tropical Agricultural Legume (TAL)-1035e0
Setting
Haramaya sitee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“isolates from central Ethiopia were better than those isolated from eastern Ethiopia and Tropical Agricultural Legume (TAL)-1035 in enhancing faba bean production at Haramaya site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1311 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

NSFBR-30 is recommended as a biofertilizer candidate for faba bean in eastern Ethiopia.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Interactor
NSFBR-30e0symbiont
Outcome
NSFBR-30 is recommended as a candidate isolate for faba bean biofertilizer production in eastern Ethiopia soilse0
Setting
eastern Ethiopia soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“NSFBR-30 is recommended as a candidate isolate for faba bean biofertilizer production in eastern Ethiopia soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1435 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

49 papers: 41 positive, 8 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

inoculation · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

98 papers: 88 positive, 10 negative or no effect

87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

94 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.