Abstract
6 Abstract: Biofertilizers can be expected to decrease the use of chemical fertilizers. The effects of native Rhizobium legominosarum bv viciae strain F46 and Azotobacter chroococcom strain AGO11 inoculation and nitrogen fertilizer was studied on growth and yield of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) in deficit irrigation. The trial was conducted as a split plot factorial experiment in Agricultural Research Station of Boroujerd. Co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Azotobacter increased total nitrogen content, nodulation, seed yield and biological yield under water deficit condition. Hence it can be suggested that co-inoculation of Rhizobium Legominosarum and Azotobacter chroococcum can improved some of growth indices under drought conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation increased total nitrogen content under water deficit.
- Taxon
- Faba bean
Vicia fabat0 - Treatment
- Co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Azotobactere0
- Second interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere0symbiont - Outcome
- total nitrogen contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- water deficit conditione0
RhizobiumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Faba bean”
e0“Co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Azotobacter increased total nitrogen content, nodulation, seed yield and biological yield under water deficit condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation increased nodulation under water deficit.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- Co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Azotobactere0
- Second interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Outcome
- nodulatione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- water deficit conditione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Faba bean”
e0“Co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Azotobacter increased total nitrogen content, nodulation, seed yield and biological yield under water deficit condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation increased seed yield under water deficit.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- Co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Azotobactere0
- Second interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- water deficit conditione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Faba bean”
e0“Co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Azotobacter increased total nitrogen content, nodulation, seed yield and biological yield under water deficit condition”
Claim · model-written summary
Co-inoculation increased biological yield under water deficit.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabat0
- Treatment
- Co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Azotobactere0
- Second interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
- Outcome
- biological yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- water deficit conditione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Faba bean”
e0“Co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Azotobacter increased total nitrogen content, nodulation, seed yield and biological yield under water deficit condition”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest co-inoculation to improve growth under drought.
- Taxon
- Faba beanVicia fabat0
- Interactor
- Rhizobium Legominosarume0symbiont
- Second interactor
- Azotobacter chroococcumAzotobacter chroococcume0symbiont
- Outcome
- improved some of growth indices under drought conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Faba bean”
e0“co-inoculation of Rhizobium Legominosarum and Azotobacter chroococcum can improved some of growth indices under drought conditions”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
Azotobacter · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Azotobacter · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Rhizobium · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
18 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →inoculation · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
45 papers more in this group
See all 49 papers →inoculation · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ
87 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree
38 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.